Subbed.
I'm not watching home on the range, or most direct to video sequels.
Do me a favor and give Tinkerbell a chance, if you haven't already. It's not like Disney's other sequels.
A bit of background: Disneytoon Studios was set up by Michael Eisner to cash in on Disney IP by making low-cost high-profit direct-to-video sequels.
Around the time that Eisner got the boot and Lasseter took over, Disney Consumer Products wanted to put some fresh character into Tinkerbell, so a movie franchise became part of that idea. Sharon Morrill, the head of Disneytoon, got an idea in her head of the perfect movie which she wanted to make (referred to as "Tinkerbell and the Ring of Belief"), and she burned through several dozen writers and directors, trying to get them to deliver the movie which she wanted.
When Lasseter came in, he took a look at their latest work, and called it an unwatchable mess. He pulled the (most recent) writer and director aside and asked them what the problem was, and they told him about Morrill. He asked them what kind of Tinkerbell movie they wanted to make, and apparently agreed with everything they said. At the next meeting, he told Morrill to scrap her work-in-progress and start over using the guidelines laid out by the writer and director. Morrill was furious, because RoB was her pet project, so she ordered Disneytoon to make two movies at once, one movie that paid lip service to Lasseter, with the other being her not-trashed pet project. Disneytoon was ordered to hide their work on her movie, and exclusively show people the fake movie that they weren't really working on. She would surprise everyone with her movie, complete before Lasseter's, and then they would have to admit that her movie was better.
Then Lasseter came over and asked to see the preliminary work on the sequel, and they showed him pieces of what was obviously a sequel to Morrill's movie. Her ruse was revealed, and she got fired (technically, she was pulled off all projects and given a window seat until her contract expired). Pixar came in and helped Disneytoon get their movie back on track.
So Tinkerbell is not like other Disney sequels. There are actually five Tinkerbell movies so far, and I've seen four of them, and they're good-to-great. If you watch the first one, you might actually look forward to four Disney sequels. The era of terrible Disney sequels should be over. It left with Eisner. Pixar's recent trouble with sequels is an entirely different disease, with similar looking symptoms.
I agree. I've been a pass holder for my family of 4 for the past six years. This is the first year I didn't renew.As an AP holder I can firmly say that prices are getting insane these days.
Still worth it though!
I agree. I've been a pass holder for my family of 4 for the past six years. This is the first year I didn't renew.
Can we talk about what a fantastic documentary Waking Sleeping Beauty is?
I must have seen that thing like five times already. I absolutely love it. If you haven't seen this yet, go out of your way.
Was a CP for the Disney College program. I worked in entertainment. Miss my Florida home a lot. AMA?
Was a CP for the Disney College program. I worked in entertainment. Miss my Florida home a lot. AMA?
How do most people get full-time jobs at Disney? Seems like they don't publicly post a lot of their openings, I'm guessing they mostly promote from within.
I regret not doing the Disney College program when I was still in University.
Here's a great question: What's more likely to happen? Disney goes back to 2D animation or Song of The South is realized on bluray.
Do me a favor and give Tinkerbell a chance, if you haven't already. It's not like Disney's other sequels.
A bit of background: Disneytoon Studios was set up by Michael Eisner to cash in on Disney IP by making low-cost high-profit direct-to-video sequels.
Around the time that Eisner got the boot and Lasseter took over, Disney Consumer Products wanted to put some fresh character into Tinkerbell, so a movie franchise became part of that idea. Sharon Morrill, the head of Disneytoon, got an idea in her head of the perfect movie which she wanted to make (referred to as "Tinkerbell and the Ring of Belief"), and she burned through several dozen writers and directors, trying to get them to deliver the movie which she wanted.
When Lasseter came in, he took a look at their latest work, and called it an unwatchable mess. He pulled the (most recent) writer and director aside and asked them what the problem was, and they told him about Morrill. He asked them what kind of Tinkerbell movie they wanted to make, and apparently agreed with everything they said. At the next meeting, he told Morrill to scrap her work-in-progress and start over using the guidelines laid out by the writer and director. Morrill was furious, because RoB was her pet project, so she ordered Disneytoon to make two movies at once, one movie that paid lip service to Lasseter, with the other being her not-trashed pet project. Disneytoon was ordered to hide their work on her movie, and exclusively show people the fake movie that they weren't really working on. She would surprise everyone with her movie, complete before Lasseter's, and then they would have to admit that her movie was better.
Then Lasseter came over and asked to see the preliminary work on the sequel, and they showed him pieces of what was obviously a sequel to Morrill's movie. Her ruse was revealed, and she got fired (technically, she was pulled off all projects and given a window seat until her contract expired). Pixar came in and helped Disneytoon get their movie back on track.
So Tinkerbell is not like other Disney sequels. There are actually five Tinkerbell movies so far, and I've seen four of them, and they're good-to-great. If you watch the first one, you might actually look forward to four Disney sequels. The era of terrible Disney sequels should be over. It left with Eisner. Pixar's recent trouble with sequels is an entirely different disease, with similar looking symptoms.
Recently finished reading Michael Barrier's Hollywood Cartoons book and while it wasn't exclusively Disney focused, it did give a really nice insight into the company's starts to the late 60's which I don't think your typical read through of Wikipedia would give you.
Had no clue Pinocchio was a (somewhat) financial failure that forced them to cut back on Dumbo and trend more towards shorts and WW2-related animations, while Sleeping Beauty was in development hell for nearly a decade. You take a lot of granted when you're watching these films as a toddler.
I feel absolutely conflicted about Disney, his legacy and the impact of the brand on our modern culture. On one hand, I absolutely love going to WDW and generally get swept away from a lot of life's banal concerns while there. On the other hand, Disney himself was a bit of a fascist and the crass profit motive that informs the modern company is disappointing.
Here is the wiki article for Ub Iwerks if anybody is interested. Any animator should already know his story and those who are really interested in Disney's history should be intrigued about the massive role he played in Disney's inventions, the character if Mickey Mouse and the shorts that came prior. I was did disservice saying in an earlier post that without him there may have not been a Disney studio. The truth is that without him, the Disney we know today would have never existed, and probably would have imploded early on. Disney was never an animator(he tried but he wasn't good at it or drawing). He was an idea man and a good marketer. Disney himself was the brains of the operation, and Ub was the brawn (except that he was so talented it was frightening).
Anyway the article:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ub_Iwerks
I just hope that anybody whose really interested in Disney does a little bit of research about this guy, because he doesn't get any love outside of animation circles.
How do most people get full-time jobs at Disney? Seems like they don't publicly post a lot of their openings, I'm guessing they mostly promote from within.
I regret not doing the Disney College program when I was still in University.
Here's a great question: What's more likely to happen? Disney goes back to 2D animation or Song of The South is released on bluray.
Don't agree with you on your absolute favorites but I appreciate PatF and The Great Mouse Detective being there, both excellent Disney films that differed from the norm of their more successful films that come off all the better for it.
Both villains are fucking awesome too, Bruce W.Smith made a hell of a jump with Dr. Facilier after Bebe's Kids and Proud Family (which aren't awful per-say, but don't reflect his character animation skills that well IMO).
Think of a world where Shakespeare is copyright protected, think what it would've done to our culture.Or anyone can run it into the ground and milk off of someone else's legacy.
It goes both ways.
It can be great or it can be terrible.
Don't agree with you on your absolute favorites but I appreciate PatF and The Great Mouse Detective being there; both excellent Disney films that differed from the norm of their more successful films that come off all the better for it. .
Hunchback needs more appreciation. Not here, just in general.
Here we go. Disney was a man of his era, they are really informed history pieces commenting how most of this (antisemitic, racist, blah...) is false. There's no doubt he was a harsh boss, and an asshole too sometimes, and he hated unions, but the thing people always try to bring to the table to criticise disney like the above, are usually false.
On the contrary this is true and its a shame Ub Iwerks is not more known. Would have loved to know what would have happened if Disney treated Iwerks better and he hadn't join the union the year of the strike. I know he returned to Disney, but it's a pity that they never returned to be good friends like they were before that.
.
I was wondering what people thought of the image I posted earlier in this topic. I came up with the idea and the artist worked her magic creating it.
On the contrary this is true and its a shame Ub Iwerks is not more known. Would have loved to know what would have happened if Disney treated Iwerks better and he hadn't join the union the year of the strike. I know he returned to Disney, but it's a pity that they never returned to be good friends like they were before that.
Anyone else that has a son that loves Cars and Planes and doesn't get the hate?
Sure they are lower tier pixar and Disney but they are fun enough and the toys are great.
I was thinking of making a thread like this, but calling it "DisneyGAF | The Happiest Thread on Earth"
Anyone else a cast member? I know I've seen at least one or two more here, but no solid proof, plus no meet ups. There's a good chance if any of you have gone to Tomorrowland in the past year that you've seen me.
Do you work one of the rides or are you a character? I know I've seen plenty of stormtroopers whenever I go to Tomorrowland.