The Wii U Speculation Thread V: The Final Frontier

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rösti
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Didn't Miyamoto once say that he wished he could give away the hardware or sell it real cheap? I doubt they would do a free + monthly, but I could definitely see a $49 + monthly. But since Nintendo more than likely won't charge for online, I wonder what else they could offer that would add value to the payment since MS seems to be planning to do that.

Well PS+ gives away 2-3 select downloadable games free, during a period. Maybe Nintendo could do something like that, any GC or prior console game that's avaliable you can download free, maybe a couple each month.
 
It amazes me how if Retro doesn't work on Zelda, Metroid, or a new IP, then anything else is considered a waste of Retro's talent. It's no wonder Nintendo shelves most of their existing IP's.

People seem to think most of their IP's aren't good enough if they aren't Zelda, Metroid, or Mario.
Well, when Retro works on something that isn't a huge IP, it tends to be canceled due to poor quality. They apparently need these huge franchises so they can get all the help from the rest of Nintendo to end up with a game worthy of release (and then the combination of them plus Nintendo Japan results with some great games).
 
tumblr_lnvvueuSsj1qcj56b.png


Dude your coloring (No I will not add the u, no offense or anything) is amazing. I wish I could color like that, I'm more of a line artist and not even that good at that.

Thanks. I'm trying my best.

Shut up. It's awesome

Thanks, I will. I didn't want to come of as pretentious.
 
A Crystal Chronicles game would be awesome.

SE should drop the Final Fantasy brand, and just repurpose Crystal Chronicles as its own stand alone IP. It's not a FF game really, anyways, and it would give them more IP to leverage.
 
Well PS+ gives away 2-3 select downloadable games free, during a period. Maybe Nintendo could do something like that, any GC or prior console game that's avaliable you can download free, maybe a couple each month.

PS+ would be awesome but Nintendo have club nintendo as their way of rewarding fans.
 
Well PS+ gives away 2-3 select downloadable games free, during a period. Maybe Nintendo could do something like that, any GC or prior console game that's avaliable you can download free, maybe a couple each month.

This is more in the line of what I was thinking. Some cheap VC games would do the trick. You have to give people a reason to continue paying through the length of the agreement. Though I still wonder how MS will deal with those who don't pay the monthly or the early termination fee.
 
SE should drop the Final Fantasy brand, and just repurpose Crystal Chronicles as its own stand alone IP. It's not a FF game really, anyways, and it would give them more IP to leverage.

I agree with this a lot. Crystal Chronicles should be a separate brand. I think more people would respect as its own thing instead of comparing it to the rest of the Final Fantasy games.
 
I can´t shake the feeling that most "flamewars" after the Nintendo conference won´t be about the graphics (There will be wars about it but not the majority)

Nintendo seems to focus ALOT on the online aspect of the WiiU. I mean... Nintendo games DAY 1 availability on the eShop? Thats enormous.

Most flamewars may just be "NiN will NEVER be as good as XBL, because duh!!! Its NINTENDO!!! And Microsoft is GAWD of online!!!"

Watch it happen!

hey NeoGaf needs fan war BS to reduce its ever increasing population right ? good for the economy lol

A Crystal Chronicles game would be awesome.

Squenix have no reason not to cash on the 3DS hype right now,,, that game on the 3DS seems like a perfect fit amirite ?

While that does sound good I would still like a StarFox game that takes what assault did, and make it better. The idea of an open battle field, and hoping into to an arwing at anytime sounds so awesome. Just make the worlds bigger and more believable, make so that there is more than just fox battling (and actual battle field), and fix the controls.


then they should let From Software develop it ;)
 
PS+ would be awesome but Nintendo have club nintendo as their way of rewarding fans.

They've never done online gaming on this scale though, I could see them doing some extra things differently to entice people. If they could make a little extra money doing a Nintendo Network+ they should.
 
Well, when Retro works on something that isn't a huge IP, it tends to be canceled due to poor quality. They apparently need these huge franchises so they can get all the help from the rest of Nintendo to end up with a game worthy of release.

By all the help from the rest of Nintendo, do you mean the occasional Email from Miyamoto, or some video conferences with Shibata? Nintendos input on Retro is mainly restricted to an advisor, management level, and has nothing to do with the quality of Retros Team.

I also fail to see how the cancellation of prototypes that Nintendo didn't want is an indication of quality. If you really believe that Nintendo only ever cancelled Retros pitches or prototypes because of quality, after Metroid Prime, your argument stands on very thin ice.

Most of the information that came out of Retro regarding the post MP2 cancellations was that Nintendo didn't want these games in their blue ocean strategy. Given that Retro was very vocal about their dissapointement at the Wii hardware, it's very clear that Retro wanted to make games with a lot more depth and production values. Nintendo simply didn't want to invest resources in such games, no matter the quality.
 
Oh yeah, most people don't believe Nintendo can do online, they haven't done it on a large scale before so I will be really interested to see what they say about it this E3. This is actually the reason why I said yesterday that Nintendo should make an online spin-off game of one of their big franchises, ala LoZ Four Swords for Wii U.

They need to show people their confident in themselves so attaching one of your big franchises names on a game that will be played mostly online, would show people that confidence. Third-parties are gonna make the big online games, that's for sure, but having a few online heavy exclusive games will get peoples attention. HowDragon Quest runs will be big for Nintendo as well, if the Nintendo Network can handle an MMO, then it should be fine.

Jep, we need a Nintendo MMO. And i belive every Nintendo game has an online feature. Even if its "only" stuff like "ColdBlooder got all 150 stars in Mario Universe" posted on FB or Twitter.

Mario with a very awesome singleplayer + drop in/drop out coop if you activate the online mode? Would be sweet!

I also belive that the "Gameplay streaming" ability will be included. Or the "Call friend for help" option, wich lets your friend see on his controller what you see on the TV screen and could then give you instructions via voice chat.

So much potential, its amazing. I hope they use the consoles features to its fullest!
 
This is more in the line of what I was thinking. Some cheap VC games would do the trick. You have to give people a reason to continue paying through the length of the agreement. Though I still wonder how MS will deal with those who don't pay the monthly or the early termination fee.

Yeah, the MS idea does sound risky, it will be interesting to hear some of the "trouble" cases, and hear how they are handled.
 
I have a feeling when Retro reveals its game, there will be a massive bitchfest.

"Wahhh why didn't they make a new Metroid??"

"Donkey Kong Country sequel!? What the fuck! What a waste of talent!"

"Star Fox?! Animals in space ships is so lame! What a waste of talent!"

"I wanted a western developed Zelda that looks like Skyrim!"

"Where's my Uncharted killer!?"

"Eternal Darkness 2? Mehhh...Nobody except neogaf played Eternal Darkness 1...Waste of talent!"

You just know it will happen lol.
 
I have a feeling when Retro reveals its game, there will be a massive bitchfest.

"Wahhh why didn't they make a new Metroid??"

"Donkey Kong Country sequel!? What the fuck!"

"Star Fox?! Animals in space ships is so lame!"

"I wanted a western developed Zelda that looks like Skyrim!"

"Where's my Uncharted killer!?"

You just know it will happen lol.

If that wouldn´t happen we wouldn´t be on GAF.

Nintendo bitching and praising at its finest starting 0,01 seconds into the conference.

"Dat stage looks shitty, this company will never learn!" lol!
 
I really wish Square Enix got onboard with the Wii U. A new Crystal Chronicles, Dissidia, or even a mainline title would show a lot of people what's up.
I'm sure we'll be getting lots of Square-Enix games on Wii-U - they've really embraced multi platform releases. Here's what I'm hoping for: Final Fantasy 14 Online 2.0 on Wii-U near launch. This is one of the best looking MMO's on PC, with things like great realtime depth of field and its awesome FMV's being rendered in realtime, and all the revamps for the 2.0 release (which has been announced for a PS3 release in late fall) should make it a good game. It would be a good technical showcase for the system.
 
Squenix have no reason not to cash on the 3DS hype right now,,, that game on the 3DS seems like a perfect fit amirite ?

I agree, it would work on the 3DS, big time. I also see them thinking about the Wii U though, because it was the first RPG to incorporate GameCube-Game Boy Advance compatibility, so I could see them saying "hey the Wii U is built with a second screen, that's what we wanted ten years ago."
 
Wich the Wii has. Was at Nintendows website and the Kirby channel is supposed to be back with all episodes for you to enjoy. So that already happened ;)

It was a joke attempt (like "ahahaha, Nintendo will only offer this in compensation for a monthly fee !")

a failed attempt as bg took me seriously :/
 
If that wouldn´t happen we wouldn´t be on GAF.

Nintendo bitching and praising at its finest starting 0,01 seconds into the conference.

"Dat stage looks shitty, this company will never learn!" lol!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA damn I said this same sentence last year XD Boy how wrong was I ? specialy when they started that cool Pseudo 3D thingie with 3DS games AMAZING !!!
 
I loved Assault !! but I still have a special place for SF64 in my heart, what I'm suggesting is a whole reboot that make the series go mainstream ala Mass Effect,Dark Souls kinda of thing,, although those games are completely new entries, StarFox has the bases to grow into such bigger franchise but with Nintendo touches :)

Couldn't disagree more, sorry. I think that the combination of the flight genre and the anthropomorphic character design inherently limits the franchise to a niche audience, and that Nintendo would be very unlikely to turn a profit from spending an HD retail budget on it. One can only hope the rumors are false and they don't squander their premier Western studio on it as well.
 
Yeah, the MS idea does sound risky, it will be interesting to hear some of the "trouble" cases, and hear how they are handled.

How MS will deal with those who don't pay? Cut off their service, bill them, and if they still don't pay they'll send them to collections.

Yeah that would be the most likely recourse. That would be the main downside to that purchase option IMO. Even if the customer is at fault they would still likely have some resentment towards MS.

It was a joke attempt (like "ahahaha, Nintendo will only offer this in compensation for a monthly fee !")

a failed attempt as bg took me seriously :/

Or you took me seriously. ;)

Couldn't disagree more, sorry. I think that the combination of the flight genre and the anthropomorphic character design inherently limits the franchise to a niche audience, and that Nintendo would be very unlikely to turn a profit from spending an HD retail budget on it. One can only hope the rumors are false and they don't squander their premier Western studio on it as well.

I definitely believe the rumor is false. If Retro is making a game for the PS360 audience, Star Fox doesn't fit the bill.
 
Couldn't disagree more, sorry. I think that the combination of the flight genre and the anthropomorphic character design inherently limits the franchise to a niche audience, and that Nintendo would be very unlikely to turn a profit from spending an HD retail budget on it. One can only hope the rumors are false and they don't squander their premier Western studio on it as well.

And I have to disagree with you. The only Limit starfox has is that no one wants to advance it past the on-rail flight gameplay. Look at what happened with Adventure and Assault. A lot of reviewers main complaint is that it didn't stick with the on-rail flight and tried to deviate from it. Again, StarFox could make an amazing TPS if Nintendo is willing to either out the work in themselves or outsource it to a competent company. Hell, make the main campaign 4-player co-op and you got yourself one hell of a game.
 
I agree with this a lot. Crystal Chronicles should be a separate brand. I think more people would respect as its own thing instead of comparing it to the rest of the Final Fantasy games.

It just feels more new and refreshing than the mainline titles. Plus I like the name. A lot.
 
I think Nintendo may push for the game which will sells very well and profitable. By looking at Retro History, I think DK has sell more than metroids.. may be in the end we will be getting another DK.. Starfox never sell like mario or dk. but definitely will be cool with re-imagination

http://www.********.com/game/45674/donkey-kong-country-returns/
http://www.********.com/game/1339/metroid-prime/
http://www.********.com/game/2220/star-fox-adventures/
http://www.********.com/game/2222/star-fox-assault/

Or may be reboot to Metroid prime series and may be we will be getting a third person shooter and adventure..

I think Nintendo's focus will be massively on online gaming.
 
I'm sure we'll be getting lots of Square-Enix games on Wii-U - they've really embraced multi platform releases. Here's what I'm hoping for: Final Fantasy 14 Online 2.0 on Wii-U near launch. This is one of the best looking MMO's on PC, with things like great realtime depth of field and its awesome FMV's being rendered in realtime, and all the revamps for the 2.0 release (which has been announced for a PS3 release in late fall) should make it a good game. It would be a good technical showcase for the system.

This is a good idea, but I don't think Square wants two of their MMOs competing in the market so close to each other. I'm of course talking about DQ X.
 
Just caught-up.. I'm probably one of the few people who liked StarFox Adventures.. but then again, I'm a sucker for Zelda clone-like games.

And as far as Retro goes, we'll see whining when they reveal their project, but more folks with other wishes will be accepting of the project after some more details are given. I'd bet that only a small handful of folks will continue to whine in earnest.
 
Just caught-up.. I'm probably one of the few people who liked StarFox Adventures.. but then again, I'm a sucker for Zelda clone-like games.

And as far as Retro goes, we'll see whining when they reveal their project, but more folks with other wishes will be accepting of the project after some more details are given. I'd bet that only a small handful of folks will continue to whine in earnest.

I liked SFA also. I agree with you about Retro, of course people will complain, because they have so many people that admire their work, so those people are gonna want Retro to make what they want them to make, after the intial chatter though, people will probaly just get hyped for the game.
 
I thought it was an AMAZING stage! I wonder how this years stage will look like?
A giant screen in the middle (representing one TV) and two slightly smaller screens, one on each side (representing the two subscreens that each system can handle).

The screens will be used for demos, for scripted moments, and some light comedic bits. Who knows what or who will show-up during the conference in the background?

And the kicker? During the sizzle reels, (for the extra effect of overhwleming the audience and viewers) all three screens will be showing gameplay footage - each with its own unique footage!
(I can hear the media whining while the fans are eating it up!)
 
Would you guys rather have Mark Rein, Gabe Newell, Ken Levine, Hideo Kojima, or Michel Ancel come on stage during the presser for a "surprise announcement"?
Out of these probably Gabe; Episode 3 and also HL2/Portal/L4D collections, full Steamworks integration and maybe even a Wii U dedicated Steam store.

None are really betrayaltony enough for my tastes though. I want Ueda. :3
 
I'm sure we'll be getting lots of Square-Enix games on Wii-U - they've really embraced multi platform releases. Here's what I'm hoping for: Final Fantasy 14 Online 2.0 on Wii-U near launch. This is one of the best looking MMO's on PC, with things like great realtime depth of field and its awesome FMV's being rendered in realtime, and all the revamps for the 2.0 release (which has been announced for a PS3 release in late fall) should make it a good game. It would be a good technical showcase for the system.
Agree. Anihawk a few weeks (months?) ago gave me a really good reality check on the level of SE support that the lowly Wii got. And that's with SE probably putting its initial bet down heavily with Sony at the beginning of the generation, much like most everyone else.

Now that Nintendo has reinforced the whole "those who bet against Nintendo do so at their own peril" mantra, I'll bet that Japanese developers will be more inclined to follow that lesson of this generation. And SE will do well to serve as a big punctuation mark on the U's library..

Now, if only we could get them to stop diluting their own IPs..
 
A giant screen in the middle (representing one TV) and two slightly smaller screens, one on each side (representing the two subscreens that each system can handle).

The screens will be used for demos, for scripted moments, and some light comedic bits. Who knows what or who will show-up during the conference in the background?

And the kicker? During the sizzle reels, (for the extra effect of overhwleming the audience and viewers) all three screens will be showing gameplay footage - each with its own unique footage!
(I can hear the media whining while the fans are eating it up!)

Lets not get carried away here, you wouldn´t know where to look with 3 possible screens to look at ;)

I fully expect media whining, no matter what is shown and how good the stuff is.

Man, the conference starts in exactly 30 days now. Can´t wait! This will be the longest 30 days!
 
Couldn't disagree more, sorry. I think that the combination of the flight genre and the anthropomorphic character design inherently limits the franchise to a niche audience, and that Nintendo would be very unlikely to turn a profit from spending an HD retail budget on it. One can only hope the rumors are false and they don't squander their premier Western studio on it as well.

I have to disagree with you, nothing can limit starfox from being many different genres, the closest example would be Star Wars franchise with its many spinoffs,,,also if u look at my original post I said Retro would be working on something unexpected like Advance Wars, and I also believe that Retro should work on something else other than StarFox.

By the way, I noticed that a high-level Junction Point staffer's LinkedIn profile refers to working on Wii U. Part of me is still wondering if Spector lied to Nintendo Power about EM2, honestly - he could have come up with a more plausible excuse, or just been vaguer, if it actually isn't coming.

interesting find :/ ,,,maybe some other game with another Disney protagonist ?
 
By all the help from the rest of Nintendo, do you mean the occasional Email from Miyamoto, or some video conferences with Shibata? Nintendos input on Retro is mainly restricted to an advisor, management level, and has nothing to do with the quality of Retros Team.
Eh? It's pretty common knowledge that Retro really wanted Metroid Prime to be third-person, but Nintendo forced them to change it because it wasn't fun and their camera code just wasn't up to par. This was definitely a case of Nintendo severely affecting the quality of the game, as Retro fought hard over this, and they even lost their project leader over it. It's one example we know of where without Nintendo working closely witht them, the game would have apparently been a lot worse.

I also fail to see how the cancellation of prototypes that Nintendo didn't want is an indication of quality. If you really believe that Nintendo only ever cancelled Retros pitches or prototypes because of quality, after Metroid Prime, your argument stands on very thin ice.
Thin ice?

A Retrospective: The Story of Retro Studios said:
In April of 2000, Nintendo legend Shigeru Miyamoto traveled all the way to Texas to visit Retro Studios, and he didn't drop by to chat either. Upon arrival, Mr. Miyamoto reviewed and checked up on the progress of each of Retro's many projects. Discussing the visit, one source told EGM (Electronic Gaming Monthly) that, "It was like the Emperor visiting the Death Star. He didn't seem to like any of the games very much, especially the racing title, which was probably our best-looking." However, the one title Miyamoto allegedly spent the most time with was Action Adventure. "The impression was that he wasn't too thrilled," stated EGM's source in April 2001. "Nintendo would come down about three times a year and rip on most of the games, except [Retro NFL] Football, which was under the radar."

...

Yet, despite all of the problems and setbacks Retro was going through, Nintendo saw potential in the studio. Just a few weeks prior to Space World 2000 (where Nintendo officially unveiled the GameCube for the first time), the company took a very bold step and granted Retro Studios the Metroid license. The decision to entrust one of its most cherished franchises to such a troubled studio was a move that still puzzles many. Nintendo was dissatisfied with Retro's progress on nearly all of its projects -- Retro NFL Football being the only exception.

...

One hurdle that still persisted was the continued development of what some development insiders deemed a stalled project, an ambitious but problematic RPG called Raven Blade. Many have called the title unrealistically large in design, and Matt Casamassina of IGNcube recently stated the original design document was several hundred pages long! Some former Retro Studios employees believe that money and resources were wasted on the project, which showed only marginal improvements on a week-by-week basis.
 
Indeed.
Before MP, Retro went through a giant restructuring and was given laser sharp focus by Miyamoto and Nintendo.
They would not have been able to create such an amazing game before then.
 
I had this conversation with Nirolak, about what Retro could make that would attract a strong Western audience, and we did come to somewhat of a conclusion that Metroid Prime is pretty much that. It just came about at the wrong time, and skimped on a few presentation choices.

Something like BioShock is an excellent example of a non-Gears/Call of Duty game that appeals very strongly to the mass market. It's a game that hooked many new gamers this generation. If you look at how Prime operates, they're alarmingly similar. The use similar concepts and similar thematics to draw the player into the experience. Only Prime came about last generation, and on a system struggling to sell in the West. A lot of what made BioShock so appealing (excellent graphical presentation, audio recording, proper dual analogue controls, etc) wasn't available.

Whereas now it is. Funnily enough, a Wii U Metroid Prime similarly paced to the other Prime games, with production values to match modern titles, could do a pretty good job of hooking your typical Western gamer, without losing credibility or core formula. Even on a thematical level, Prime and Metroid in general stems close enough to 'grown up' than 'kids' without being obnoxious about it. Metroid can be quite scary, tense and mysterious while still be Metroid, and these kinds of things will appeal to older gamers.

In a hypothetical alternate universe where the Metroid Prime series never happened, if the Wii U was shown off with the Metroid Prime we know, only with modern graphical presentation and control standards, Nintendo would probably earn a lot of positive attention.

Your reasoning is convincing, but I remain skeptical. I really, really hope you're right. Metroid Prime was so awesome. Especially the first game.
 
Lets not get carried away here, you wouldn´t know where to look with 3 possible screens to look at ;)

I fully expect media whining, no matter what is shown and how good the stuff is.

Man, the conference starts in exactly 30 days now. Can´t wait! This will be the longest 30 days!
That would be the point. *evilgrin*

Imagine the hysteria. The chaos. Let's say that you decided to follow the big screen live, knowing you could watch the subscreen videos later. The conference ends, and the mania begins..

"OMG.. so many games!!!"
"did you see Game X on Screen 3? It was there for about three seconds!"
"WHAT?! No! "
"I saw Game N on Screen 1 - Character D was on there in the middle of a boss fight!"
"Holy shit!"
(and so on..)

The craziness of such a scenario for the hours afterward, the feeling of not being able to keep-up with the sheer number of games coming for the system, members of the media scrambling to get to the video footage of the screens they didn't follow while at the conference, gamers in effect having three sizzle reels instead of one.. I think it'd make quite an impression, haha!

Alternate proposition:
the main screen during the sizzle reel shows what's happening on one's TV - while the sidescreens show the corresponding subscreen footage that correlates with the game on the TV. This would also produce a smaller level of chaos and excitement.
 
Your reasoning is convincing, but I remain skeptical. I really, really hope you're right. Metroid Prime was so awesome. Especially the first game.

Oh, I don't think Retro is working on Metroid Prime HD, if that's what you took away from my post. Simply that a Metroid Prime HD could theoretically appeal to a similar 'mass market' audience as BioShock does.
 
If not a Metroid Spin Off, then a reboot of the Prime games would be wonderful.
Maybe use their concepts from "Toon Metroid".
UFu3k.jpg

auyEY.jpg


This could really help spur the franchise, I think.
Make it much more of an adventure game with a focused story and an amazing style.
 
By the way, I noticed that a high-level Junction Point staffer's LinkedIn profile refers to working on Wii U. Part of me is still wondering if Spector lied to Nintendo Power about EM2, honestly - he could have come up with a more plausible excuse, or just been vaguer, if it actually isn't coming.

I've reported an interview where Spector explain Epic Mickey is planned as a trilogy so surely the third title will come to Wii U.

Or, it could AGAIN be a PR twist, why risking to divert the audience susceptible of buying the Wii version (scheduled for september if i remember right) by revealing the existence of a Wii U one that may release 2 months after. And we saw that nearly none studios could really announce their Wii U project this past year (NDA, etc.), so maybe what they said about it was just a weird way to say they can't further comment on it (doubtful). Or they count on the backward compatibility and they'll only make a Wii version of Epic Mickey 2 but include on the disc a padlet support when played on Wii U.
 
Out of these probably Gabe; Episode 3 and also HL2/Portal/L4D collections, full Steamworks integration and maybe even a Wii U dedicated Steam store.

None are really betrayaltony enough for my tastes though. I want Ueda. :3
Now that third-party exclusives are a relic of times before us, I wonder: Is the era of the betrayalton past?

(now that I've asked it, I feel kinda silly. Watch someone prove me wrong here in 31 days.)

And a Portal collection would be friggin' incredible. With relations warming, I still don't have much hope. But there's always Steam..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom