Yeah, I'm gonna need someone to explain how judging figure skating works since even if people fuck up completely they still place higher than the ones that are just as technical, and instead only have 1 quad in their program instead of 2. It's dumb...
And rofl at that top 2, what a joke
I'm only a casual observer but the new system is actually a lot easier to understand and a lot more transparent than the old one.
The old system used to give judges a lot of leeway to score things how they saw on two components-- technical merit and presentation-- on a scale of out 6.
The new system assigns point values to all the maneuvers and the elements of every program as well as adding a "grade of execution" system that allows the judges to mark up or mark down an element for being performed well or performed poorly.
Basically the old system allowed major fudgery, but I think it feels like there was a lot more room for magic to happen, but I think that might just be my perspective. Sarah Hughes in 2002 is probably one of my favorite Olympic long programs, but I'm not sure how technically accomplished it was compared to something Yuna Kim is doing now...I know she was the first female to do two triple triple combinations in the Olympics.
Now some skaters you know don't even have a shot from the opening blocks because they don't have the component points in their score. A quad is worth 8 points, a triple is worth 5 points, etc.
Still, it is easy to see how judges judged after...the scores are released and everything is broken down very technically.
I can't help but wonder though if the emphasis on jumping passes has reduced the appreciation of artistry in the competition.