Winterblink
Member
It's more like a controlled fall, like a flying squirrel.That ski jumping really is something else. They actually fly
It's more like a controlled fall, like a flying squirrel.That ski jumping really is something else. They actually fly
#whitepeopledancingThe hell is she doing?!
I love how the Canadian Woman hockey team is so dominating that when they win they still give the first star to the loosing team goaler haha.
#whitepeopledancing
That was quick.
Why does the US rank the countries by total medals and the rest of the World rank them by Gold first, then use Silver and Bronze as tiebreakers?
Wins matter most in my eyes. The USA counts medal total because it benefits them most, but it doesn't make much sense.Medal Count...
Why does the US rank the countries by total medals and the rest of the World rank them by Gold first, then use Silver and Bronze as tiebreakers?
I'm not sure what way is better... maybe there should be some happy points based middle ground... 10 points for Gold, 3 for Silver, and 1 for Bronze seems okay.
Nerves? They made some bad shots that they just normally never do. Plenty of time to get their heads on straight.Good thing this is just the round-robin. Canada's men's curling team need to get their shit together.
I don't know, but I would guess it's because U.S. probably places higher on total medals than gold medals.
Wins matter most in my eyes. The USA counts medal total because it benefits them most, but it doesn't make much sense.
Yep.Is this men's moguls live on CBC?
I think you are right.I don't know, but I would guess it's because U.S. probably places higher on total medals than gold medals.
Broadcasting of hockey is surprisingly lacking on Dutch TV.
China won in 2008, Canada in 2010, and Great Britain won in 2012, so my assessment seems fairly accurate.USA usually dominates both counts in the Summer games so your assessment is not exactly right.
You guys should really watch the men's tourny if you can. It's pretty much like the world cup except for ice hockey. You will see some really exciting matches there.
Medal Count...
Why does the US rank the countries by total medals and the rest of the World rank them by Gold first, then use Silver and Bronze as tiebreakers?
I'm not sure what way is better... maybe there should be some happy points based middle ground... 10 points for Gold, 3 for Silver, and 1 for Bronze seems okay.
Exactly. It's all about volume with the US. Get as many athletes in every event, while other countries prefer only some sports.China won in 2008, Canada in 2010, and Great Britain won in 2012, so my assessment seems fairly accurate.
The US has a large pool of athletes and a lot of money to spend so they can be close to the top in almost everything, but you can't guarantee gold.
You guys should really watch the men's tourny if you can. It's pretty much like the world cup except for ice hockey. You will see some really exciting matches there.
Who cares about total medal count really?
I mean, I want Canada to win as much as possible, but I just cheer the individuals/team during their competition.
I feel I should point out that I don't really care about medal count either. All things being equal I will cheer for Canadian athletes simply because I'm Canadian, but I usually cheer for the coolest or most deserving athletes, regardless of nation. Canadian or not, some people are assholes and I don't want to cheer for an asshole.Who cares about total medal count really?
I mean, I want Canada to win as much as possible, but I just cheer the individuals/team during their competition.
I actually posted earlier that the way the US ranks the countries goes against the official IOC method. The rest of the world just follows the official way so it has nothing to do with how few medals they get.The rest of the world does that that to take away from the fact how few medals some of them get. Total medal count is the right way to go about it as even a bronze medal is more than not getting a medal at all.
Exactly. It's all about volume with the US. Get as many athletes in every event, while other countries prefer only some sports.
That's what the IOC and most of the world believe. Only the high population superpowers think otherwise.I'm just weighing in on the fact that gold medals should be the determining factor as winning is what matters.
because the olympics are a big national dick measuring contest, just like any other international sporting event.
There's a crash and burn on the moguls. Pushing the limit. Needed to advance but risky.Never seen moguls before. Holy shit that must be absolutely brutal on your knees.
They also wipe out a lot more, it seems. I think they're well aware the level of competition is incredibly high so if they don't go for it they're not gonna have a chance. The ladies have the luxury of being a bit more conservative, I think.Such a difference watching men's moguls over women's. Pretty amazing how fast some of them go.
NBC is sorting countries by gold, silver, then bronze.
And they broadcast the games... so those saying "USA sorts by total medals" may want to simmer down.
Good run!!!
China won in 2008, Canada in 2010, and Great Britain won in 2012, so my assessment seems fairly accurate.
The US has a large pool of athletes and a lot of money to spend so they can be close to the top in almost everything, but you can't guarantee gold. Trying to justify your spending makes sense, and - in this case - going by total medal count is the best way to do so.
I wouldn't call it conservative. They're just not as fast and powerful so less chance of losing control. When a guy loses it, it's a real crash and burn.The ladies have the luxury of being a bit more conservative, I think.