SpacePirate Ridley
Member
I think theres a fine line between educational and fun. Im of the thought that, yeah, maybe EPCOT is better movie toon free. But at the same time, kids learning with nemo about the oceans and sea is like a no brainer if you think about it, so its really a tough choice.
Then is the Walt Disney quote that goes something like, "do it first and for most fun, when the kids are having fun, is when they are going to start learning" that I whole heartly agree, and that's how the original Disneyland was build (Tomorrowland was a great example of this).
Then is also that is not really toon free, you already have things like figment, a beloved toon character for Epcot, but yeah, maybe IMO it would be better with good original for the park toon characters, than movie toon ones for EPCOT.
There are some really boring rides right now in EPCOT also that seems way too much educational and not fun or interesting, so that is not a good way to build a better EPCOT either.
Not talking about EPCOT now, but something similar happens with critics that would hate that they turned the old building of Carrousel of Progress in Disneyland (with that horrible educational only attraction right now) into an Ironman ride. I dont think this guys have think throughly the advantages of doing that. Just think for a moment (this is, if the imagineers have the same idea to treat the ride as I have, of course, although I dont think it's too difficult), make something similar to the old Carroussel of Progress, with an educational and fun walktrough (so something semi realistic) of what the future can bring to your home, but instead of using General Electric like in the old times, you are using Stark Industries, so you have holograms of Robert Downey Jr, explaining funnily what the future can bring, people are having fun, they are learning (as I said this future objects are semi-real) and at the end you make the ironman shenanigans vs some villian that saves the building and you top it off with people leaving happy and possibly returning.
It's no different than Adventure thru inner space if you really think about it.
You are just changing the sponsor from a real company to a fictional company, and that also comes with huge advantages.
You could even call the ride: "Carroussel of Progress - Sponsored by Stark Industries"
It would be a ride that feels perfectly in the heart of old Tomorrowland, more than anything they have in that land right now.
Then is the Walt Disney quote that goes something like, "do it first and for most fun, when the kids are having fun, is when they are going to start learning" that I whole heartly agree, and that's how the original Disneyland was build (Tomorrowland was a great example of this).
Then is also that is not really toon free, you already have things like figment, a beloved toon character for Epcot, but yeah, maybe IMO it would be better with good original for the park toon characters, than movie toon ones for EPCOT.
There are some really boring rides right now in EPCOT also that seems way too much educational and not fun or interesting, so that is not a good way to build a better EPCOT either.
Not talking about EPCOT now, but something similar happens with critics that would hate that they turned the old building of Carrousel of Progress in Disneyland (with that horrible educational only attraction right now) into an Ironman ride. I dont think this guys have think throughly the advantages of doing that. Just think for a moment (this is, if the imagineers have the same idea to treat the ride as I have, of course, although I dont think it's too difficult), make something similar to the old Carroussel of Progress, with an educational and fun walktrough (so something semi realistic) of what the future can bring to your home, but instead of using General Electric like in the old times, you are using Stark Industries, so you have holograms of Robert Downey Jr, explaining funnily what the future can bring, people are having fun, they are learning (as I said this future objects are semi-real) and at the end you make the ironman shenanigans vs some villian that saves the building and you top it off with people leaving happy and possibly returning.
It's no different than Adventure thru inner space if you really think about it.
You are just changing the sponsor from a real company to a fictional company, and that also comes with huge advantages.
You could even call the ride: "Carroussel of Progress - Sponsored by Stark Industries"
It would be a ride that feels perfectly in the heart of old Tomorrowland, more than anything they have in that land right now.