what made you 'high risk' ?
Tend to agree with youIs anyone actually thinking that there is some genuine compromising material about Trump in the Epstein files? Correct me if any of the below is wrong but suppose he is in there and it is bad... that would mean:
I have no idea why he has mishandled it so badly over the last week or 2 but I really can't see how actually bad info about him could be in the files. Given all of the above, I'd bet that they will show that he was an acquaintance, at most.
- The original Epstein conviction happened and he escaped being implicated
- The Epstein flight logs have been released and somehow only show that he flew with Epstein from Florida to NY but he didn't go to the island
- After he won in 2016, Obama/Hillary etc. decided to say nothing about it because falsely accusing him of being a Russian asset was the better play
- Democrats sat on the info throughout his first term because Mueller and the other impeachment attempts were the better play
- The Biden DOJ, NY AG etc. didn't go after him for it while they were throwing all kinds of lawfare at him after his 1st term.
- The MeToo movement came and went, and no Epstein victim came forward to accuse him
- Trump has mentioned the Epstein files who knows how many times since 2016, despite knowing that he is probably in there too and he'd get crucified if it came out.
- After being arrested during Trump's 1st term, Epstein and Maxwell didn't blackmail him with the kompromat they had on him. Sitting on it so they could commit suicide/be convicted was the better play.
who?Ian Carroll?? For shame. This guy is a fucking mark and no one should listen to him about anything.
A lot of people, very smart people, are telling me there's a FORUM called NeoGAF, full of VERY ANGRY GAMERS and very FAKE "journalists." They say I should release the Epstein files… folks, these are the same people arguing for thousands of pages over the PS and XBOX. Now they think they're detectives! Epstein this, Epstein that, meanwhile half of them still believe Half-Life 3 is coming out. VERY SAD! I didn't fly the plane. I didn't visit the island. But Bill Clinton? 26 TIMES. That's a FACT. But they don't talk about that. Why? Because NeoGAF is run by radicals and console warriors who HATE TRUTH, even in 4K at 60 FPS. Maybe I'll release the files… when NeoGAF admits TRUTH SOCIAL has better load times.
MAGA!
Why would that have anything to do with Musk? Twitter had racist bot farms long before him. It was a cess pool since near its inception.not from foreign accounts, it's musk using a bot farm.
I would literally bet the farm on it, because he's a little rat
Kinda on-topic/adjacent, this debate is friggin insane. Open fascism/ethno-nationalism/racism (at least some are honest in stating their position). One guy doesn't mind being called a nazi, another one is totally fine with Israeli snipers shooting Palestinian children in the head -- interestingly, that was a bridge too far for most, even the nazi. They talk about Epstein, too, but mostly it's about immigration and the constitution.
Kinda on-topic/adjacent, this debate is friggin insane. Open fascism/ethno-nationalism/racism (at least some are honest in stating their position). One guy doesn't mind being called a nazi, another one is totally fine with Israeli snipers shooting Palestinian children in the head -- interestingly, that was a bridge too far for most, even the nazi. They talk about Epstein, too, but mostly it's about immigration and the constitution.
It's actually very well-researched on both sides (which is not to say there aren't some craaazy ideas in there). I do believe both sides truly believe what they preach. The "fascist" says he wants a Catholic authoritarian ruler and is anti-democracy. The interviewer is very well-read and articulate. It's kind of refreshing to hear such frank talk, though a bit frightening.Noped out after the first minute. This looks staged at the most or just some clickbait sensationalism at the least.
I bet neither the interviewer or interviewee know what fascism actually is.
I'm definitely not gonna debate these points with anyone here, wanna respect Evilore's guidelines. I think it's fine as long as one just observes and doesn't speak out. There was nothing hyperbolic in the description of my post, just observation of the kinds of affiliations being expressed like I said.I saw that too and it was fucking wild, but I didn't want to discuss it here for its heavily political nature. We're kinda living on the edge by staying on topic in this thread as is.
It's just kinda sad what happens when media literacy and education go down the toilet for these individuals.
Kinda on-topic/adjacent, this debate is friggin insane. Open fascism/ethno-nationalism/racism (at least some are honest in stating their position). One guy doesn't mind being called a nazi, another one is totally fine with Israeli snipers shooting Palestinian children in the head -- interestingly, that was a bridge too far for most, even the nazi. They talk about Epstein, too, but mostly it's about immigration and the constitution.
This is a great analysis.Is anyone actually thinking that there is some genuine compromising material about Trump in the Epstein files? Correct me if any of the below is wrong but suppose he is in there and it is bad... that would mean:
I have no idea why he has mishandled it so badly over the last week or 2 but I really can't see how actually bad info about him could be in the files. Given all of the above, I'd bet that they will show that he was an acquaintance, at most.
- The original Epstein conviction happened and he escaped being implicated
- The Epstein flight logs have been released and somehow only show that he flew with Epstein from Florida to NY but he didn't go to the island
- After he won in 2016, Obama/Hillary etc. decided to say nothing about it because falsely accusing him of being a Russian asset was the better play
- Democrats sat on the info throughout his first term because Mueller and the other impeachment attempts were the better play
- The Biden DOJ, NY AG etc. didn't go after him for it while they were throwing all kinds of lawfare at him after his 1st term.
- The MeToo movement came and went, and no Epstein victim came forward to accuse him
- Trump has mentioned the Epstein files who knows how many times since 2016, despite knowing that he is probably in there too and he'd get crucified if it came out.
- After being arrested during Trump's 1st term, Epstein and Maxwell didn't blackmail him with the kompromat they had on him. Sitting on it so they could commit suicide/be convicted was the better play.
Kinda on-topic/adjacent, this debate is friggin insane. Open fascism/ethno-nationalism/racism (at least some are honest in stating their position). One guy doesn't mind being called a nazi, another one is totally fine with Israeli snipers shooting Palestinian children in the head -- interestingly, that was a bridge too far for most, even the nazi. They talk about Epstein, too, but mostly it's about immigration and the constitution.
Kinda on-topic/adjacent, this debate is friggin insane. Open fascism/ethno-nationalism/racism (at least some are honest in stating their position). One guy doesn't mind being called a nazi, another one is totally fine with Israeli snipers shooting Palestinian children in the head -- interestingly, that was a bridge too far for most, even the nazi. They talk about Epstein, too, but mostly it's about immigration and the constitution.
It's actually not though. Every one of those premises is bad. Just pick your favorite or the one you think is the strongest I can probably refute it in one sentenceThis is a great analysis.
Noped out after the first minute. This looks staged at the most or just some clickbait sensationalism at the least.
I bet neither the interviewer or interviewee know what fascism actually is.
The past 10 years have completely sobered me up as an American. It's just been incredibly depressing.
53 years ago Nixon was impeached because of Watergate.
27 years ago Clinton was almost impeached for getting his dick sucked by Monica Lewinsky and lying about it.
Today, you see our President and Politicians get away with outrageous shit that absolutely dwarfs the kind of scandals we used to throw our leaders into the fire for years ago. The precedent has been set. You can just do whatever the fuck you want now. I am completely convinced that even if the Epstein Files released, Trump is on the list, and we find out he absolutely 100% fucked some underage girls, it wouldn't change a thing. People would get outraged, but he'd still be our President.
Maybe for a lot of people, they dont care about politicians' dubious personal lives and just care about the laws, economy, and political topics that will affect them directly. If modern day life is supposed to be so hard, stressful and costly now vs the old days where mom and dad could buy a big house on a normie job after high school, maybe people have more concerns in life than what Clinton or Trump does after work.The past 10 years have completely sobered me up as an American. It's just been incredibly depressing.
53 years ago Nixon was impeached because of Watergate.
27 years ago Clinton was almost impeached for getting his dick sucked by Monica Lewinsky and lying about it.
Today, you see our President and Politicians get away with outrageous shit that absolutely dwarfs the kind of scandals we used to throw our leaders into the fire for years ago. The precedent has been set. You can just do whatever the fuck you want now. I am completely convinced that even if the Epstein Files released, Trump is on the list, and we find out he absolutely 100% fucked some underage girls, it wouldn't change a thing. People would get outraged, but he'd still be our President.
This is the most surprising thing of all.I have no idea why he has mishandled it so badly over the last week or 2
Which doesn't make sense given the way he has reacted, not only that, he was the one pushing for this narrative, but against Clinton and Prince Andrew.but I really can't see how actually bad info about him could be in the files. Given all of the above, I'd bet that they will show that he was an acquaintance, at most.
Have you considered that maybe both Democrats and Republicans have allies they're trying to protect, and that's why neither side has released everything?
Anyhow, the strong public demand for transparency on this, especially from the MAGA crowd, is because Trump and his team made releasing those files a part of their campaign (to garner votes and make the Democrats look like a party of predators). MAGA is the reason it's back in the news cycle, they're demanding the release of the files, and left-leaning media outlets are using their outrage to turn it against Trump. It's pretty straightforward.
It's a self inflicted controversy.
This is the most surprising thing of all.
Which doesn't make sense given the way he has reacted, not only that, he was the one pushing for this narrative, but against Clinton and Prince Andrew.
But in terms of actually bad info? The issue with the Epstein files is that they involve very powerful people; if Trump falls....everybody has to fall too...and that ain't gonna happen.
Trump has already admitted his name is all over the files. Please stop deluding yourselfThis only explains some of the points I made and it relies on all Democrats and Republicans being unified in their reactions, with none of them going rogue. We had the stars align with MeToo climaxing at the same time as peak TDS and Epstein/Maxwell being arrested but there were no accusations, true or false, made by Epstein victims. It just doesn't add up.
We are missing some info to explain his recent behaviour. I lean towards it all being an intelligence blackmail operation (with Trump not being implicated) and releasing the info eliminates the leverage that they currently hold
Trump has already admitted his name is all over the files. Please stop deluding yourself
This only explains some of the points I made and it relies on all Democrats and Republicans being unified in their reactions, with none of them going rogue. We had the stars align with MeToo climaxing at the same time as peak TDS but there were no accusations, true or false, made by Epstein victims. It just doesn't add up.
Trump has confessed to being implicated in the sexual abuse of minors or Trump has confessed to him being in there as some kind of acquaintance, like I originally said?
Obama put him in the files in a favorable way maybeTrump has confessed to being implicated in the sexual abuse of minors or Trump has confessed to him being in there as some kind of acquaintance, like I originally said?
Obama doing his best to maintain the magical negro stereotype alive uh?Obama put him in the files in a favorable way maybe![]()
Kinda on-topic/adjacent, this debate is friggin insane. Open fascism/ethno-nationalism/racism (at least some are honest in stating their position). One guy doesn't mind being called a nazi, another one is totally fine with Israeli snipers shooting Palestinian children in the head -- interestingly, that was a bridge too far for most, even the nazi. They talk about Epstein, too, but mostly it's about immigration and the constitution.
Did he also admit to his fake attack on him ear?Trump has already admitted his name is all over the files. Please stop deluding yourself
Please talk more about *insert other person's name here*, not about that Epstein thing.
That's what the POTUS is acting like right now.
i think the context is Epstein being an "asset" for a government/agency or something like thatWhat do the flight logs mean in this context, that they flew to a party?
The real issue is the powerful people involved in whatever the fuck epstein was doing. The sex aspect of this "conspiracy" is not really THE issue, otherwise this situation wouldn't be in this circumstances.The issue here is the underage girls and money being transfered.