ProtoByte
Weeb Underling
That's fine, but Tucker's content is trash. It doesn't make any sense on its face, like a lot of the things he's said and done in the last few years.I'm adding content. Not commentary. Hard to believe it is anything other than a cover up.
This kind of misconception is emblematic of what pervades the discussion around cases like this. A rounding error percentage of people actually go through the timelines (in this case that goes back somewhere between 25 and 40 years ago depending on where you start) and official sources of evidence. How many people have actually read the memos? Or the 6-22 year old articles? Or seen the full videos of interviews and statements and actually paid attention to the precise language?saw this on twitter and it is wrong. Patel's gf works for an NGO that was started by an ex-Israeli intelligence person. The gf herself is not israeli or mossad. plenty of people work for PragerU and are not mossad.
Like with Alex Acosta and his supposed statements about how Epstein was "for intelligence". He never actually made that claim personally - it was attributed to him anonymously. He didn't outright deny it, but never confirmed it.
Most people just kind of skim over secondary or tertiary sources, absorb a few snippets in (usually online) conversation and then regurgitate in extremely boiled down fashion, up to and including outright inaccuracies. And no one's instinct is to turn on their "rationality" when the subject matter is so evil and disgusting. And no one wants to be that person that says "let's get into the facts" because people will hear "facts/details" as "semantics" or "excuses" for something so disgusting.
But Bondi has not done well in facilitating clarity. It's one thing to talk a big game before you have the access and clearance to see behind the curtain, but she's been imprecise and sloppy with this as AG.
Even back in February with that binder photo op, the prospects for new significant information were looking weak.
Shapiro leans towards mild institutionalism; but if you listen his rationale about this, it's difficult to say that it makes absolutely zero sense with the publicly available evidence.Ben Shapiro is often willing to oppose obviously nonsense talking points from team R, so it's interesting to see him fully on board with the gaslighting campaign.
This guy is not fond of the Trump admin and would be more disposed to believing in the "Mossad!!" blackmail theory by virtue of his opinions on Gaza.
Perhaps we should listen to Mike Benz, who has (supposedly) also done very deep research into this: