DeafTourette
Perpetually Offended
The pictures of Trump and young Ivanka are ... I'm not sure what emotion I'm feeling
The pictures of Trump and young Ivanka are ... I'm not sure what emotion I'm feeling
They are pretty disgusting if you ask me. His comments are even worse and his actions below that if that article is accurate.
The pictures of Trump and young Ivanka are ... I'm not sure what emotion I'm feeling
It is, but does that really matter? There are 2D and 3D stuff out there already with that content.That's assuming the fake AI cp won't be outlawed, which it almost certainly will.
I agree, all the moralizing about cartoon porn is going to create more real victims (the only ones that matter). Let's hope society figures it out sooner rather than later.It is, but does that really matter? There are 2D and 3D stuff out there already with that content.
It's only a matter of time before someone wins a "there are no actual humans involved" lawsuit (be it porn, violence, whatever) that undermines the effort to ban this stuff. And it makes a certain amount of sense. If I draw a stick figure "we are not step-siblings" pron comic, what is the actual harm? No humans were involved, no children (or adults), no actual siblings. And since it is a crude stick figures, much like the marionette sex scene in Team America, its all up to the viewer to really inject the 'sin' into it. So at what point does resolution and photorealism cross the line? I suppose they can use the argument that AI is learning from real CP in order to build CP images but I'm not sure that's true.
It's gonna be the same with AI assisted "invisible glasses". I think there are already programs that can digitally 'strip' a person, and the less they are wearing, presumably the more accurate the nude modelling. Is it an assault on the person? Are deep fakes?
Al this stuff is gonna have to be legislated by the very same ancient, decrepit congresscritters wrapped up in this epstein stuff. Gonna be a total shitshow. It leads to those dumb disclaimers on drawings, the quick "you are my step-bro" comment (though if the actors aren't related, what does it matter the characters they play?), or the "I'm actually a 10000 year old dragon, I'm just drawn this way".
On the one hand it is a dirty feeling even debating these things. But on the other hand its the spear tip on general censorship issues and quickly leads to broader topics across entertainment, art, and technology.
And she sat on it through FOUR YEARS of ABSOLUTE HITLER, plus all THREE election cycles????
You haven't established jack or shit. No one here has seen whatever constitutes the "Epstein List". I'm not defending Trump, just stating that if there was IRON CLAD evidence, particularly video evidence, it would have come out in the past FOUR YEARS when the current admin and the ENTIRE media went after Trump. A video of Trump plowing a child doesn't implicate Clinton, Hanks, Gates, Spielberg, or any one else. It ONLY implicates Trump 'cause he is the ONLY ONE in the video. So why haven't we seen it?
Simplest answer is that there is not such a video. Not of Trump, maybe of others though.
But most likely is any "Epstein's List" is circumstantial regarding specific acts of child sexual assault and it wouldn't hold up against Trump, nor anyone else. There is smoke, but no fire, from a LEGAL perspective, and sadly that is the ONLY perspective that matters. The US gov isn't in the business of slander or libel, which is EXACTLY what releasing a bunch of testimony to the general public would be.
Y'all gotta stop watching NCIS or SVU, the real world just doesn't work that way. Epstein choking to death, whether by his own hand or someone else, is probably the only justice those poor girls are gonna get.
Keep it civil, friends.
She won't live long enough for that to happen.
Not going to lie, when I heard him, that was a bit of a neck turner to me, and mildly concerning somewhat.Ben Shapiro is often willing to oppose obviously nonsense talking points from team R, so it's interesting to see him fully on board with the gaslighting campaign.
Keep it civil, friends.
Mossad's original motto literally translated to "by way of deception"
As far as I am concerned this seals it. And you know what, he knows he's lying and he knows we know he is lying.
Dude. That is every major covert ops department on the planet.Mossad's original motto literally translated to "by way of deception"
As far as I am concerned this seals it. And you know what, he knows he's lying and he knows we know he is lying.
While it's true that the political right has made a bed to lie in with the conspiracy minded base, it doesn't change the fact that this handwringing about the "list" now coming from the other side of the aisle is entirely cynical. They don't believe what they're saying. I've posted multiple links in this thread that are easily verifiable, often from the mainstream media at that. They know the foundations of this stuff is not based on any real facts.I mean, this admin had every opportunity to make this a slam dunk win for them.
They've simply instead decided to torpedo any semblance of credibility they could have salvaged at every opportunity.
Whatever happens going forward is entirely on them. They highlighted this specific subject in the lead up to the election and were vocal about it plenty even after they won. To fumble thjs badly at this stage cannot be blamed on Dems or anyone else. They set themselves up for failure.
I'm not defending Trump, just making more rational and grounded assumptions than you.You are absolutley trying to defend Trump. You're in here downplaying, minimizing and dodging even the most blatant contradictions in his own statements. Again, you haven't seen it used because it would incriminate politicians, donors and "friends" of both the Democrats and the Republicans.
The Simplest answer is the one that has the most evidence behind it - the guy who was by admission close friends with Epstien, was photographed and recorded in his company and spoke knowlingly about his taste for young girls and boasted about his own. Who has been caught repeatedly lying about his association with Epstein and confessed abusers like Prince Andrew, and who's name in on the flight logs. The guy who Epstein himself claimed to be best friends with and is referred to by in tapes of Epstein and in conversations about tapes of who was engaging in activity. The guy who was in charge when Epstein mysteriously self-deleted and who is now trying to make the evidence and attention go bye-bye too. The simplest answer, is that that guy is covering his own tail because the evidence paints him into a very ugly child fucking picture.
Seriously, you're running damage control for child sex abuse. You are literally trying to downplay and dismiss one of the most blatant and clear cover-ups of our time because it implicates your dear leader.
Nefarious Jewish conspiracy if an Israeli visits, no conspiracy if Clinton, Gates, Trump, Prince Andrew, etc., are best friends with him?Do we know why a former Israel PM visited Epstein 30 times after it was public of Epstein's crimes?
Fair enough I only read down on the tweet you posted. Saw someone posted 2 articles saying this.Nefarious Jewish conspiracy if an Israeli visits, no conspiracy if Clinton, Gates, Trump, Prince Andrew, etc., are best friends with him?
I don't think it should be ruled out by any means, just a lot of the talk swirling around is speculative and being spread by people like Tucker (who is himself a foreign agent, arguably). There are claims that Maxwell's father had ties to Mossad too.Fair enough I only read down on the tweet you posted. Saw someone posted 2 articles saying this.
Everyone wants to think they have some special handle on "the truth" that other people don't. That they are the special ones. That's just human nature and confidence tricksters are always on the look out for people who are vain and think they are superior, doesn't change. People don't age out of it but still there is no fool like an old fool.It's kind of weird that Trump was going on about this list for the longest time and now he just wants everyone to stop thinking about it, usually he's fairly sensible with the kinds of messages he crafts for his audience.
Seems there was some major miscalculation and people either feel momentarily confused or maybe for some the veil has been finally lifted from their eyes? I have no idea, it always sucks when one finds out their view of things has been skewed or manipulated.
I remember when I was super deep in the_donald subreddit thinking I knew something no one else did, being part of some special community that knew the "truth". Looking back it seems like some very smart people knew exactly what to do to manipulate me. Perhaps this will be the end of manipulation for a lot of people.
I don't want to derail the thread, but I'd be interested in your take on this. Honestly, I'm unsure what to think of him, but at least he can be amusing.I don't think it should be ruled out by any means, just a lot of the talk swirling around is speculative and being spread by people like Tucker (who is himself a foreign agent, arguably). There are claims that Maxwell's father had ties to Mossad too.
I'm not defending Trump, just making more rational and grounded assumptions than you.
If this was 2016 and Trump was running for pres on a "release the list" plank and then did this, Yes, I would be more inclined to believe that there is incriminating evidence against Trump that he is trying to suppress.
BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUT he WAS president already, an "ABSOLUTE AMERICAN HITLER" according to the left and the MSM, had access to any "list" at that time, then spent 4 years as a citizen being RELENTLESSLY ATTACKED by the current admin of the time and the MSM, then runs AGAIN, gets in, and during all this no one leaks ANYTHING from this supposed goldmine of evidence? BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUULLLLLLLLLSHIT.
The argument that "the list" would have to be released in its entirely to completely false. Just portions of it could be released, as it isn't a literal "list on a sheet of paper" but rather a compilation of evidence, all of which could be separated out. And if Trump says he's gonna go out naming names, well, who would care? The MSM is in control and could squash anything they don't want released, just like they did with the Hunter laptop full of all sorts of juicy stuff INCLUDING, supposedly, Hunter with underaged girls which was the reason those photos were removed from the internet in the first place.
So don't go cry that all these folks aren't torching Trump because it would have too much blowback. The reality is they could selectively release evidence, if they A. had anything conclusive and B. ANY of it related to Trump. You really think the DOZENS and DOZENS of analysts, investigators, and legal reps that must have access to this stuff would ALL stay quiet if they are looking at photos of famous and powerful people all fucking kids? You must believe we have aliens hanging out in Area 51 as well.......
This heresay rumor mill shit is the best they can do because it requires no proof and it just feeds into the confirmation bias of the listener anyway.
You are totally contradicting yourself. Either the "Epstein Files" are so hidden, so secretive that Trump can squash them through FOUR YEARS of an extremely hostile administration, OR they are so accessible, so open, so easy to get that if ONE PERSON in them gets outed, THEY ALL DO.And when he was president the first time Epstein got off'd, under his watch, and in the most unbelievable circumstances that were never properly explained and have been repeatedly changed by Trump and his own people. We've gone from no security tapes and guards asleep, to tapes but not of the scene, to "raw" footage with blatant and clear gaps and metadata showing it has been cut and edited. When Trump was in power this whole cover up started and now that he's in power again he has his team declare the list he has constantly vouched for and talked about does not exist, has them release doctored and inconclusive footage, and then goes on to gaslight people for asking for the list and evidence and then flips again to claim Obama and Hilary fabricated a list to get at him, didn't use it, but put their own names on there.
You're not thinking rationally. You're not looking for the simplest explaination. You're twisting and evading all of the evidence and history of this and Trumps involvement in it. You're completely ignoring the contradictions and lies in his statements made about the list in just the past couple of days, and you're parroting all of the catch phrases and party lines (MSM, "American Hitler" "Russiagate") just to deflect and downplay the absolute shitshow that this guy is part of.
And I'm going to keep going on about the MAD aspect preventing the Dems from releasing the evidence because we have quotes from Gislaine acknowledging that tapes of both Trump and Clinton exist. Neither side can do a partial without the otherside being able to blow them up too. Mutually Assured Destruction. Same way a nuclear power can't launch "just a couple" of their nukes without getting nuked themselves.
And this isn't heresay. This is Trump and his administration's own actions exposing them. The constant lies and contradictions. Trump's desperation to stop people talking about the very thing he has bleated on about constantly to gain political points. "There is a list", "I've seen the list", "there are thousands of videos" to "There is no list", "stop talking about that guy", "there is a list but the Dems made it up to get me, never used it, but then put their own names in it"
When somebody shows you who they really are, believe them.
You are totally contradicting yourself. Either the "Epstein Files" are so hidden, so secretive that Trump can squash them through FOUR YEARS of an extremely hostile administration, OR they are so accessible, so open, so easy to get that if ONE PERSON in them gets outed, THEY ALL DO.
So which is it? Are the Epstein files so easy to hide that no one can get to them except Trump? Or are the contents so well known that Trump has allies ready to throw up their info if he gets outed?
MAD only works when EVERYONE has their finger on their button. But cover-ups, by their very nature, require a very small, very close knit group to maintain the confidence. Unless you think that every field agent, every analyst, every janitor in the room, every litigator, every congressional appointee, etc that EVER saw a piece of this was 10000% on board with hiding it and neeeeeevver would release info.
Is it bad to say I wish that guy hadn't just clipped his ear? I feel like maybe we'd be worse off if he was a martyr but hot damn this president sucks eggs
If this was 2016 and Trump was running for pres on a "release the list" plank and then did this, Yes, I would be more inclined to believe that there is incriminating evidence against Trump that he is trying to suppress.
You didn't see Tuckers investigating journalism™ video in Russia where hes just gobbling up Putin's dick the entire time (while Putin makes fun of him I may add) and marveling over shopping carts that even poor European countries have been using for 50 years ?I don't want to derail the thread, but I'd be interested in your take on this. Honestly, I'm unsure what to think of him, but at least he can be amusing.
As for everything else, how many connections do you need to draw an obvious conclusion? That's the problem with RICO stuff I guess
This is a bad take brother. Or, at least, you have to offer some plausible explanation for all the other shit that happened that day if you're going to say something like thatI honestly believe there was no assassination attempt. No one's ear regrows tissue/cartilage like that. And in less than 3 weeks it was back to normal? No scarring?
Is it bad to say I wish that guy hadn't just clipped his ear? I feel like maybe we'd be worse off if he was a martyr but hot damn this president sucks eggs
You didn't see Tuckers investigating journalism™ video in Russia where hes just gobbling up Putin's dick the entire time (while Putin makes fun of him I may add) and marveling over shopping carts that even poor European countries have been using for 50 years ?
While there is no evidence of Tucker getting paid, people have gone under oath to say that Russia Today was paying right wing influencers, including Tucker specifically, to propagate Kremlin talking points.
We do know the US DOJ charged two RT employees for giving millions of dollars money to right wing media groups like Tenet Media (ie Tim Pool, Dave Rubin) in exchange for Kremlin talking points. You can figure out the rest
What do they do in eastern Europe?Jokes aside, supermarkets in Eastern Europe are on a whole other level.
What do they do in eastern Europe?
This is what my grocery store has, and I live in fucking Kansas. It's fucking dope
How is it a gimmick?Yeah, that's a stupid gimmick. I hope it never makes its way to where I live. Where do you even put your kid to sit?
How is it a gimmick?
You just throw shit in ur cart and then walk out. It's literally magic
If you brought this to eastern Europe they'd crucify you for witchcraft
Sounds like the poor European version trying to make you do the cashier's work for free. JK! that's actually what they use in France and it's actually really nice. But in Europe unfortunately everyone steals shit so you can't have nice things and they have to audit you fairly often which defeats the entire purpose IMO. Anyway this cart is just the next level of that, and it just worksThe shopping journey using this is not that different from what we call self-scanning in The Netherlands. And that doesn't require any specific high-end shopping cart. It works with normal carts that have a child seat, regular small shopping baskets, mid-size baskets you can drag behind you, or even without any basket at all.
It's a gimmick. A very cool gimmick that I'm sure is meant to impress executives, but it's still stupid.
Your ignorance is shining through.
Not to mention that it eliminates yet another widespread "low bar for entry" job for kids, moms, and retirees. Of course when folks try to make these sorts of low skill jobs into "careers" and demand a "living wage" then OF COURSE the corporate solution is to eliminate the human job, not pay them more.It's a gimmick. A very cool gimmick that I'm sure is meant to impress executives, but it's still stupid.
Ya how else we gonna pay the 85 yr old cashier's at Walmart that are trying to pay their medical debt.Not to mention that it eliminates yet another widespread "low bar for entry" job for kids, moms, and retirees. Of course when folks try to make these sorts of low skill jobs into "careers" and demand a "living wage" then OF COURSE the corporate solution is to eliminate the human job, not pay them more.
It's the natural consequence of having all those out of work coal miners "learning to code"![]()
You didn't see Tuckers investigating journalism™ video in Russia where hes just gobbling up Putin's dick the entire time (while Putin makes fun of him I may add) and marveling over shopping carts that even poor European countries have been using for 50 years ?
While there is no evidence of Tucker getting paid, people have gone under oath to say that Russia Today was paying right wing influencers, including Tucker specifically, to propagate Kremlin talking points.
We do know the US DOJ have charged two RT employees for giving millions of dollars money to right wing media groups like Tenet Media (ie Tim Pool, Dave Rubin) in exchange for Kremlin talking points. You can figure out the rest