Jason Statham is seeking...SHELTER

Edit: Thread title changed so nevermind.

This is a general thread because there's no point in making a thread for every new film he makes when we all know what to expect.

Here's the trailer for "Shelter", in theaters January 30th.

 
Last edited:

you%27re-welcome-jonas-taylor.gif
 
Because there's no point in making a thread for every new film he makes when we all know what to expect.

Here's the trailer for "Shelter", in theaters January 30th.



Yep. That looks like a Jason Statham movie.

Can't blame the guy. These are just easy pay cheques for him.
 
Yep. That looks like a Jason Statham movie.

Can't blame the guy. These are just easy pay cheques for him.
I think that action stars like him are trying to do what Arnold did in the 80s and 90s with all of these recent action movies.

I also think what I took for granted (and what modern action stars are missing) is the fact that Arnold would still pick more challenging roles within broader genres than just action/thriller.

If Statham was the guy back then, would he have chosen roles like Total Recall? or Kindergarten Cop? or Twins? I'm just not sure.

I feel like his most outlandish movies were Crank 1/2 and Meg, and even those were based in action.
 
I think that action stars like him are trying to do what Arnold did in the 80s and 90s with all of these recent action movies.

I also think what I took for granted (and what modern action stars are missing) is the fact that Arnold would still pick more challenging roles within broader genres than just action/thriller.

If Statham was the guy back then, would he have chosen roles like Total Recall? or Kindergarten Cop? or Twins? I'm just not sure.

I feel like his most outlandish movies were Crank 1/2 and Meg, and even those were based in action.
I think Arnold made like 10M for each of those movies. I'm sure Jason would have done them.
 
I think that action stars like him are trying to do what Arnold did in the 80s and 90s with all of these recent action movies.

I also think what I took for granted (and what modern action stars are missing) is the fact that Arnold would still pick more challenging roles within broader genres than just action/thriller.

If Statham was the guy back then, would he have chosen roles like Total Recall? or Kindergarten Cop? or Twins? I'm just not sure.

I feel like his most outlandish movies were Crank 1/2 and Meg, and even those were based in action.
He is a more accomplished actor than Arnold was in his prime. His collaborations with Guy Ritchie are a testament to that.
 
I always drag my gf to see whatever Statham shlock is playing in theaters, this will be no exception. I can honestly say, despite how dumb and full of plot holes they are, I haven't hated a single movie. Even The Meg 2.
 
This does not seem like an exciting plot, I'm pretty sure I've seen like 3 recent films with a boss lady of color standing in a room of monitors screaming at men sent to die at the hands of rogue operatives as well. Totally generic.

Buuuuut Statham always delivers and I do need to support a fellow Jason.

I do wish he would do some sci-fi. He was TERRIBLE in fantasy but I think he could stand for some near future stuff.
 
I think that action stars like him are trying to do what Arnold did in the 80s and 90s with all of these recent action movies.

I also think what I took for granted (and what modern action stars are missing) is the fact that Arnold would still pick more challenging roles within broader genres than just action/thriller.

If Statham was the guy back then, would he have chosen roles like Total Recall? or Kindergarten Cop? or Twins? I'm just not sure.

I feel like his most outlandish movies were Crank 1/2 and Meg, and even those were based in action.
Arnold's career is wacky, he did three James Cameron films, as well as a Verhoeven film and a McTiernan film.

Modern action stars like Statham and The Rock is stuck doing slop.
 
I would like to see Jason Statham keep acting in movies titled after various occupations.

The Librarian
The Ice Cream Man
The Sandwich Artist
The Human Statue
The Ventriloquist
The Xenobiologist
 
Arnold's career is wacky, he did three James Cameron films, as well as a Verhoeven film and a McTiernan film.

Modern action stars like Statham and The Rock is stuck doing slop.
Those were better days with better directors. Almost no one today capable of making even one film like those guys, and all three have multiple bangers under their belts.
 
I think that action stars like him are trying to do what Arnold did in the 80s and 90s with all of these recent action movies.

I also think what I took for granted (and what modern action stars are missing) is the fact that Arnold would still pick more challenging roles within broader genres than just action/thriller.

If Statham was the guy back then, would he have chosen roles like Total Recall? or Kindergarten Cop? or Twins? I'm just not sure.

I feel like his most outlandish movies were Crank 1/2 and Meg, and even those were based in action.
Agreed, but i thought he was fucking hilarious in spy; would love to see more of that.
 
I always drag my gf to see whatever Statham shlock is playing in theaters, this will be no exception. I can honestly say, despite how dumb and full of plot holes they are, I haven't hated a single movie. Even The Meg 2.
Haha that reminds me when my brother and I went to watch every Van Damme movie, no matter what. We often sat alone in the smallest cinema and made fun of what's happening on screen. Good memories.

Statham really became the new Bruce Willis.
 
Caught Snatch on TV the other day. I've got it on DVD of course, but that film's a magnet and if I watch a few seconds of it that's me done until the credits. I don't think there's a scene that doesn't make me laugh. Everyone, Statham included, is brilliant in it. Statham looks so young in it, probably because he's got a little bit of hair (and because it was 25 years ago).
 
If Statham was the guy back then, would he have chosen roles like Total Recall? or Kindergarten Cop? or Twins? I'm just not sure.
For the good stuff check out Snatch and Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. A more comedic psycho would be his role in Mean Machine. For outright parody comedy he was in Spy with Melissa McCarthy.
 
For the good stuff check out Snatch and Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. A more comedic psycho would be his role in Mean Machine. For outright parody comedy he was in Spy with Melissa McCarthy.
Hummingbird and Revolver are a bit different as well, along with Blitz.

I will add that I love Spy, especially his character. Apparently he was worried about doing the film because he's not a comedy actor but the director told him not to worry and treat it like any other film that he makes. It works really well with his straight faced character delivering the retarded lines.
 
My least favorite action movie actor along with Steven Seagal.

They are both always the same boring invincible characters who rarely get scratched.
 
Last edited:
My least favorite action movie actor along with Steven Seagal.

They are both always the same boring invincible characters who rarely ever get a single hit.
I'd argue that is a legit sub-category of action films. I does get a bit boring when it's the same actor doing it, over and over, but that's just the niche they occupy. I don't recall Bruce Lee getting beaten up much. Arnie either. Then guys like JCVD, Jackie Chan, or Bruce Willis make the hero's suffering part of the journey.

But never forget, Steven Segal allowed himself ONE MOMENT of weakness....

 
I'd argue that is a legit sub-category of action films. I does get a bit boring when it's the same actor doing it, over and over, but that's just the niche they occupy. I don't recall Bruce Lee getting beaten up much. Arnie either. Then guys like JCVD, Jackie Chan, or Bruce Willis make the hero's suffering part of the journey.
Never liked Bruce Lee either, mostly for the same reason. But pretty sure Arnie got his fare share of beating in some of his movies. He got his ass kicked in both Terminator 2 and The Predator, for instance. Those are his best movies, funnily enough. Are they not?

Jackie Chan was always my favorite. I love it when there's this huge guy who throws him around like a puppy. I guess i prefer the heroes who are more relatable and vulnerable.
 
Never liked Bruce Lee either, mostly for the same reason. But pretty sure Arnie got his fare share of beating in some of his movies. He got his ass kicked in both Terminator 2 and The Predator, for instance. Those are his best movies, funnily enough. Are they not?

Jackie Chan was always my favorite. I love it when there's this huge guy who throws him around like a puppy. I guess i prefer the heroes who are more relatable and vulnerable.
Fair enough, it's a legit preference.

That's why I tend to vary my action film viewing. Most of these guys deliver pretty uniform experiences. Scott Adkins is basically....Scott Adkins in every film. So I know what I'm gonna get and can slot in one of his films when I'm in the mood to see a guy systematically dismantle hordes of mooks. Statham is very much the same way. Stallone I think its a little more comfortable showing emotion and vulnerability, though a lot of his action catalogue is basically killing machine stuff like the rest. Dolph Lundgren, for me, is the biggest disappointment. He just has that dead pan sleepy delivery style that all his physical perfection is wasted outside of some select roles where the director wakes him up a bit.
 
For the good stuff check out Snatch and Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. A more comedic psycho would be his role in Mean Machine. For outright parody comedy he was in Spy with Melissa McCarthy.
I know about those but they aren't in the same realm as the Arnold movies I've listed.
 
Waiting for a movie where Jason Statham is… A Homeless Man. An Unhoused Man would work too.
Oh man, market it like a Hallmark film about a lonely widow that takes in a homeless guy for Christmas, cleans him up, dresses him, shares xmas dinner with her multicultural array of kids by different daddies, ALL OF WHOM TURN OUT TO BE FROM VARIOUS CRIMINAL GANGS AND THEY ALL DECIDE TO RAID THE HOUSE TO GET THEIR KIDS BACK AND THE STATHAM HAS TO DEFEND THE HOUSE!!!!!!!!

Bonus if one of the criminal daddies is Macauley Caulkin :P
 
I love these "statham as secret ex SAS super soldier assassin trying to be normal until the wrong people show up" movies lol. It's total junk food film but he's fun to watch.
 
I love these "statham as secret ex SAS super soldier assassin trying to be normal until the wrong people show up" movies lol. It's total junk food film but he's fun to watch.
I'm no Tier One Operator, but I did sleep in a Holiday Inn last night so even I know that these guys gotta spend HOURS every DAY shooting, training, and sparring to keep all those skills up, yet hollywood thinks you can just chop wood or fish all day and still bullseye a womp rat at 90 paces :P

I blame Commando for this entire trend, was that the first one?

RojKulDf4eoNFpTt.jpg
 
I think that action stars like him are trying to do what Arnold did in the 80s and 90s with all of these recent action movies.

I also think what I took for granted (and what modern action stars are missing) is the fact that Arnold would still pick more challenging roles within broader genres than just action/thriller.

If Statham was the guy back then, would he have chosen roles like Total Recall? or Kindergarten Cop? or Twins? I'm just not sure.

I feel like his most outlandish movies were Crank 1/2 and Meg, and even those were based in action.

Arnold also has a lot of scenes where he's in a room just talking building his character in the movie. I don't think Jason stands still in a scene just talking that isn't a tough guy exchange for more than 5 secs total a movie
 
I'm no Tier One Operator, but I did sleep in a Holiday Inn last night so even I know that these guys gotta spend HOURS every DAY shooting, training, and sparring to keep all those skills up, yet hollywood thinks you can just chop wood or fish all day and still bullseye a womp rat at 90 paces :P

I blame Commando for this entire trend, was that the first one?

RojKulDf4eoNFpTt.jpg
It is a staple of several Westerns and Samurai cinema.
 
It is a staple of several Westerns and Samurai cinema.
Ah, good point. Though maybe there is a difference between the "retired gunslinger forced to do one last job" (which I guess is the Commando model) and the "hiding out/retired gunslinger with a bounty on his head being chased" that the Statham films are using. I can think of a fair number of the former, but few of the latter. I'm sure they are out there though.
 
I'm kinda bummed the Hobbes and Shaw stuff seems dead, I liked their dynamic.

You will know the John Wick franchise is out of gas when they cast Statham as a "bad guy" who realizes he is just like John Wick halfway through and they team up to fight yet another nebulous but infinitely resourced assassin coalition together :P
 
Statham always just plays himself. I did enjoy Wrath of Man a fair bit, even if it tried to be more clever than what it actually was.

I have noticed his movies are becoming less action dense as the years go by, and he lacks the charisma 80's action stars had to fill the time between kicking ass.
 
Wrath of Man was good because of the way it was cut with a small air of mystery of what the entire plan was. Probably the stand out for me.
Give me a Liam Neeson rewatch any other day of the week though. Or the Equalizer dude
 
Last edited:
Wrath of Man was good because of the way it was cut with a small air of mystery of what the entire plan was. Probably the stand out for me.
Give me a Liam Neeson rewatch any other day of the week though. Or the Equalizer dude
I was actually pleasantly surprised at how Equalizer 3 had an old-school slow buildup to it's climax. Both the direction and pacing were very different from the first two movies.
 
what do you call his accent he has in all his movies?
Terrible. I don't know if he's trying and failing, has been told to do something that is slightly more understandable for American audiences, or some third rubbish reason. Honestly I don't always understand what he's saying when he does the gibberish accent.

He's at his best when he's just being English. I can't stand it when he does anything else.
 
Terrible. I don't know if he's trying and failing, has been told to do something that is slightly more understandable for American audiences, or some third rubbish reason. Honestly I don't always understand what he's saying when he does the gibberish accent.

He's at his best when he's just being English. I can't stand it when he does anything else.
I'm not sure he even knows what accent he is trying, other than to deepen his voice and sound gruff. A lot of the brits and aussies have a much higher pitched "natural" voice than how they act, particularly if going for some sort of americany accent.
 
Top Bottom