Superhero movies already have their Citizen Kane, and it's called Thor 2: The Dark World.
wowowowowow positive early reactions for a comic book movie on twitter
I too cannot believe my eyes.
What does look like an 80s game mean?
The CGI looks like NES graphics
We'll see if Agents of Shield gonna have that 80s feel too. LolThe "music" and "70s/80s" angles is making this feel a lot like Marvels stretching out the Guardians of the Galaxy formula - or is that just the aesthetic they've assigned to "off-Earth/in space" movies?
Love how Marvel let Taika Waititi make a movie that's Waititi-ish as hell.
Pretty much what we'd expect, but if the joke aren't landing, MCU's constant humor can be the most grating thing. Loved it for Avengers, Iron Man 3 and Guardians 1. Dr. Strange, Guardians 2 and Homecoming were a different story.Jokes and characters are front and center to the action & drama. This will be the thing people will either love, or dislike, about the film.
Sure looks colorful, but "it's fun" is what you say about a movie when you can't find anything to actually praise.
It's MCU, not an art house film. The thing they do best is being fun. What did you expect?
This.wowowowowow positive early reactions for a comic book movie on twitter
Waititi used Big Trouble in Little China as an example of what he wanted to do with the film. Covers both the music and the 80s angles, I reckon.The "music" and "70s/80s" angles is making this feel a lot like Marvels stretching out the Guardians of the Galaxy formula - or is that just the aesthetic they've assigned to "off-Earth/in space" movies?
ALL early reactions are positive. ALL early reactions may or may not be studio driven screeners.
Press/fan screeners haven't happened yet.
The tweets are from professional film likers...
The tweets are from critics...
I've fixed it now
(i've got a lot of faith in this movie and its director, but still)
Yep, sounds like a same old "fun" (read: empty) MCU movie. At least this one seems to look good. Will watch for brunette Blanchett.
Yeah, its an MCU thread alright.These are the "bought" critics. The ones who never have anything negative to say about a movie. I use to go to a lot of screeners and I've met some of those types. They usually are super well known, get flown places, and think everything is awesome. One even said the latest Transformers is a must see and definitely in IMAX.
The real critics who'll say negative things haven't got a screening yet considering the movie is about a month away.
Yeah that's what they meant I think. A movie being fun often hints at mindless action over deeper substance. So it's not a good indicator for a movie's quality if you are not that easily entertained.Transformers movies are fun?
One even said the latest Transformers is a must see and definitely in IMAX.
As often as not. It's more important for a Marvel movie to be fun than good though.Does fun mean good?
This thread is gonna look real silly once it's out and is another homerun for Taika.
This thread is gonna look real silly once it's out and is another homerun for Taika.
Does fun mean good?
Yeah I'm going to a Stranger Things 2 watch party that night. So Thor, you will have to wait till the weekend.This comes out in theaters here the same day Super Mario Odyssey and Stranger Things 2 comes out...
Considering how every Marvel movie turned out and what I thought of them, I'm not sure critical acclaim for a MCU film means anything to me anymore.
Asked Sadfleck.Does fun mean good?
I think people here are just showing fatigue for these "first impressions". they're always super positive, and the actual quality of the movie never seem to matter. we've seen so many super-positive first impressions for average (or bad) movies that now it's difficult to tell when it's really awesome, a sort of "cry wolf" in reverse. I'm definitely going to watch this on a big screen because I believe Taika Waititi can't do wrong and it's going to be great, but I hope you get my point
Weird months you must have considering its out in just over two weeks.These are the "bought" critics. The ones who never have anything negative to say about a movie. I use to go to a lot of screeners and I've met some of those types. They usually are super well known, get flown places, and think everything is awesome. One even said the latest Transformers is a must see and definitely in IMAX.
The real critics who'll say negative things haven't got a screening yet considering the movie is about a month away.
That is a better way to put it for sure. Remember early reactions to BvS were positive.
I just don't want the Guardians movies to lose their personality by being a winning formula that Marvel bleeds dry.
I'm glad they're doubling down on "fun," though. Comic book and superheros movies need to have a good chunk of wonder and levity or they collapse under the weight of middle-aged men in silly costumes self-seriously brooding.
These are the "bought" critics. The ones who never have anything negative to say about a movie. I use to go to a lot of screeners and I've met some of those types. They usually are super well known, get flown places, and think everything is awesome. One even said the latest Transformers is a must see and definitely in IMAX.
The real critics who'll say negative things haven't got a screening yet considering the movie is about a month away.
That is a better way to put it for sure. Remember early reactions to BvS were positive.
Yup, the expectations for what these movies are shouldn't be high. Ofcourse there are good comic book movies and sometimes the makers take some risks even, but rarely anyone should expect much substance. It's dumb fun when it works.Dude..
Its Thor
Fun is the best case scenario for the source material adaptation
Unless someone wants to educate me on how the marvel comic could somehow be elevated
If we even wanted to go there in the first place lol
If only these lowly Marvel flicks could come close to reaching the cinematic heights of Zack Snyders magnum opus.