Culex said:Time Splitters 3: Dreamcast Perfect.
IJoel said:Looks awful.
It screams $19.99 budget title. I wouldn't be surprised if it was sold at that price.
Burger said:The singleplayer screens look fine.
BAH!!!RE4 vs. SH4 said:LOL, you people need to realize that not all FPS titles are going to be big budget games like Half-Life, Unreal, DOOM, Halo, etc. I've seen videos of a developer playing this title at E3 and the game looks great. It animates well, has a solid framerate, and uses some nice effects.
RE4 vs. SH4 said:LOL, you people need to realize that not all FPS titles are going to be big budget games like Half-Life, Unreal, DOOM, Halo, etc. I've seen videos of a developer playing this title at E3 and the game looks great. It animates well, has a solid framerate, and uses some nice effects.
JJConrad said:BAH!!!
Who wants a console FPS with a solid framerate?
Kobold said:I finished this game and do not understand the TimeSplitters hype. This game is as shallow a shooter as you can get, only the humor is mildly amusing and motivating to actually play.
If your into REALLY shallow arcade shooters then this is for you, and if offers a lot of gameplay in the form of bot matches, so you can easily be playing this for a year or so. But the gameplay is about as sophisticated as a rockfarmer. All levels are the same, only thing you do is basically pull the trigger when an enemy pops in front of your gun. Oh, and the guns change in between levels but stay basically the same!
I was glad it was over to be honost...
Anyways, for those who are into that! I'm sure they'll eat it up. I won't grade it higher then 7, that alone for the sheer amount of playability in the tons of botmissions, challenges and modes and sometimes fun singleplayer moments.
(not to mention i posted these here shots and video's last month or so...)
Kobold said:All levels are the same, only thing you do is basically pull the trigger when an enemy pops in front of your gun.
Nah not at all. But this is literally a shooting gallery. You try running into 2 elites in Halo 2, you'll get owned with style!Wyzdom said:i understand here that you don't like any FPS :lol
Naw, they cool. Just I don't like TimeSplitters 3 gameplay.wobedraggled said:Wow, look at all the free radical hate.
I would call neither impressive ever, but the facial animation system is still very cool and should be used in more games for expressions. It's very Jak and Daxterish!dark10x said:It's not that bad looking in motion, though...
The animation is very smooth, the framerate is 60 fps, and it has a nice clean appearance. It's not a stunner, but it isn't half bad. Second Sight is more impressive looking, though...
I finished this game and do not understand the TimeSplitters hype. This game is as shallow a shooter as you can get, only the humor is mildly amusing and motivating to actually play.
If your into REALLY shallow arcade shooters then this is for you, and if offers a lot of gameplay in the form of bot matches, so you can easily be playing this for a year or so. But the gameplay is about as sophisticated as a rockfarmer. All levels are the same, only thing you do is basically pull the trigger when an enemy pops in front of your gun. Oh, and the guns change in between levels but stay basically the same!
I was glad it was over to be honost...
Anyways, for those who are into that! I'm sure they'll eat it up. I won't grade it higher then 7, that alone for the sheer amount of playability in the tons of botmissions, challenges and modes and sometimes fun singleplayer moments.
Exactly, Timesplitters 2 looks awesome, and so does this. I can't wait to play this and see all the new multiplayer options. TS2 = best multiplayer FPS ever.Tellaerin said:I like the clean, stylized look to the visuals--it reminds me of airbrushed 2d art. (I liked it in TS2, too, and this is definitely a step up from that.) IMO, 'good-looking' doesn't automatically mean 'dark, gritty ultra-realism' or 'gratuitous bump-mapping slapped onto every available surface'.![]()
shpankey said:now the most overrated series is seen for what it is. shit. always has been.
p.s. these graphics suck.
etiolate said:Graphic Whores can go take a shit. It's about level and weapon design and FreeRadical has shown they know how to get that done. I'd take this over Doom 3 anyday.