4 is a cutie
Banned
I stopped taking tinder seriously, now I just put a picture of a hot dude and just keep on swiping to see how many matches I can get. Currently at 250 matches lmao.
I stopped taking tinder seriously, now I just put a picture of a hot dude and just keep on swiping to see how many matches I can get. Currently at 250 matches lmao.
I stopped taking tinder seriously, now I just put a picture of a hot dude and just keep on swiping to see how many matches I can get. Currently at 250 matches lmao.
So, you sure showed them right!I dont have a tinder account but I might just make one to do this. Then when I get a match, I will switch my profile pic to the fedora man.
Them: "Hi"
Me: "m'lady"
I stopped taking tinder seriously, now I just put a picture of a hot dude and just keep on swiping to see how many matches I can get. Currently at 250 matches lmao.
Ive got 323 matches and im not even that attractive.
Yeah im not a swipe right on everyone person. Even being selective i cant be bothered having conversation with most of them.Depends how selective you are being. I used to swipe right on nearly everyone and somewhere around 1300 matches I realized what's the point. Now I'm extremely picky and have close to 400.
Honestly i mean i don't know what people are expecting. I'm probably gonna sound like some old irredeemably anachronistic goof that's just too far from the realities of the modern man and woman. But how isn't it clearly obvious that a software that reduces you to your most basic elements would completely destroy your perception of yourself? I haven't used it myself because i think it requires a facebook account, but i've seen my friend use it and it literally just is pick who looks like someone hot, pretty, or interesting with no room for any degree of complexity to actually communicate what kind of person you are, and all that shit that makes you feel like a human being.
Of course that engaging in a platform that doesn't let you show others the actual depth and volume of your person, and for intimate relations no less, would utterly remove you from a place of proper self reflection. How can self reflection be healthy when you're missing such a huge chunk of your self?
Isn't that the case in real life also when you want to approach a stranger for dating? What else are you going on when you don't know the person.Honestly i mean i don't know what people are expecting. I'm probably gonna sound like some old irredeemably anachronistic goof that's just too far from the realities of the modern man and woman. But how isn't it clearly obvious that a software that reduces you to your most basic elements would completely destroy your perception of yourself? I haven't used it myself because i think it requires a facebook account, but i've seen my friend use it and it literally just is pick who looks like someone hot, pretty, or interesting with no room for any degree of complexity to actually communicate what kind of person you are, and all that shit that makes you feel like a human being.
Of course that engaging in a platform that doesn't let you show others the actual depth and volume of your person, and for intimate relations no less, would utterly remove you from a place of proper self reflection. How can self reflection be healthy when you're missing such a huge chunk of your self?
Isn't that the case in real life also when you want to approach a stranger for dating? What else are you going on when you don't know the person.
I don't think so.
Most men are decent looking but stuff like poor grooming, poor nutrition, lack of exercise, poor fashion sense limits a lot of dudes.
Terrible profile pics don't help.
Men, generally, don't get aesthetics. Women are socially conditioned both by society, marketers and each other to put a premium on aesthetics.
The male gaze being as harsh as it is.
Gay men find a similar problem. Incidentally many gay men understand aesthetics better than straight men because of this.
To see this better look at the old show Beauty and the Geek. Dudes make dramatic turnarounds when in the hands of professionals with taste.
Height doesn't affect someone's life? That's mighty ignorant. It affects employment, pay rises, wages, relationship opportunities (you've gotta earn more if you want to be considered attractive), Hollywood, among others. There are only a few states that right now have made height discrimination illegal and there are quite a few legal cases have been won over it.
Just because beauty standards are disproportionate for women doesn't mean we should dismiss another real issue.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Height_discrimination
what the! i'm lucky to get one match a week
I don't know I just believe some people aren't that realistic. But the other issue is that the internet seems to almost be breeding serial daters, if someone has just one minor fault, they move on as there's always 500 people just one click away. They think the grass is greener, but smetimes the grass is only greener where you water it, but nowadays people don't want to put the work in.
Restart your account. There are algorithms in place that most people don't know about. Not sending a message to a match, unmatching immediately, swiping right on everyone, etc. puts you at the back of the queue because the behavior hurts their product. Restarting your account resets it. For reference, my 5'6 self has gotten over 100 matches in the last two weeks since restarting my account.
Actually, the bad thing is that I now have too many matches that maintaining multiple conversations is a hassle. I forget to actually respond to women who then probably think I've ghosted them.
You still approach them because you find them attractive or interesting. At least if you are looking for dates, which is what the whole app is about. You need to compare it to approaching strangers, not friends. And if you approach a stranger for a date, I can't really think of anything other then attractiveness and/or looking like an interesting person for you.I mean, not really, when you meet someone new in person you can get a much better perspective of what kind of person they are, and optimally you would already kind of know someone before actually being romantically interested in them. By them being friends of friends, by working with them in some way, by having worked with them in the past, because you're you both always go to the same places all that kind of jazz. All of those already give you more than what someone's face looks like and what kinds of clothing they're wearing, and most importantly, life (meaning, when you're doing things in life) is not a controlled space and by interacting with people in real life you inevitably give off a much more complex image than when you can control exactly what people can see of you.
That is how some people use it. Like with a lot of things, don't focus exclusively on it. Tinder and online dating are good to use, but not as your only way to get in touch with people. The problem here is not Tinder then, it is people giving up on other ways of getting a date or relationship, which are all still available.But, again, this really is not what my point was and this constant redirection towards the mechanisms of dating are really putting a hamper on the discourse about this subject. Subject being self esteem, self perception, not... dating. Dating is one aspect out of many in how you relate to other humans and it will never provide a proper way to perceive yourself in isolation, which is exactly what folks seem to be doing with Tinder and similar platforms. And this in turn seems to accentuate what everyone think about what being with humans means.
You are leaving out the whole "interesting" part from earlier. You talk to them because you find them "hot, pretty, or interesting". Someone doesn't have to be hot to be interesting as a person.Like that poster who also quoted me, declaring that i would start a conversation with someone because they're attractive, which, i mean, it's clearly obvious to me that that's simply not the case. I don't talk to people because they're attractive, i talk to people because i want to talk, and whether they're attractive or not rarely provides a good measure of how good at talking they are (in fact, if i may be permitted some degree of stupidity, i admit i tend to avoid very attractive people on the grounds that they are likely not very interested in talking). And i accept that this might be just me, it might, but it does no one no good to speak in generalized manner at the same time dismissing the broad nature of how different people can live and do things differently, including these specific things relating to human interaction. Is it true that some people only talk to others because they're physically attracted to them? Yes, it is, but is that true for the vast majority of humans? No, it really isn't, and the degree of demographics culling you would have to do to make that a positive is so overwhelmingly myopic that i'm tired of accepting it as the common parlance of this supposedly cosmopolitan society of ours. How wouldn't that kind of myopia dissolve any sense of self worth? How wouldn't it make your self esteems stand on wooden stilts so thin any bump on the road would demand strenuous, exhausting dexterity to keep yourself together?
Sorry for the long post.
My favorite part is when correlation is used throughout that page.
Do you have anecdotes of how these statistics are affecting short males? Like, are any financially ruined? Socially ruined? There are negatives to being short but it's not actually affecting someone too much. I'll ask you since the others don't actually want to answer: why should I invest energy in a movement that mostly appears when a man is rejected by a woman?
why should I invest energy in a movement that mostly appears when a man is rejected by a woman?
That is how some people use it. Like with a lot of things, don't focus exclusively on it. Tinder and online dating are good to use, but not as your only way to get in touch with people. The problem here is not Tinder then, it is people giving up on other ways of getting a date or relationship, which are all still available.
Restart your account. There are algorithms in place that most people don't know about. Not sending a message to a match, unmatching immediately, swiping right on everyone, etc. puts you at the back of the queue because the behavior hurts their product. Restarting your account resets it.
I don't think Subpar Spatula is arguing in good faith. He's stubborn to understanding the issues that height brings, and can't seem to understand the broader context of the problem in other areas than just dating. He seems to believe that we're asking him to play his pity violin just for males when height problems affect women too. I think because we're in a thread about dating, he perceives that people bringing up height discrimination are only interested in this topic and not the other areas where it's involved.... What? What are you asking?
No one is financially ruined just because of their height, just like no woman is financially ruined because of being a woman. That does not mean a salary gap does not exist, and in both cases it does. There is research on this area. Research conducted on a certain topic has much more weight than any anecdotes (because they are just that, anecdotes), and it is easily accessible online in psychology journals, especially those that study behaviour. Studies show that height in men affect how they are socially perceived , and also that it does influence hiring decisions (taller men are more likely to be considered positively in hiring and other screening processes). And there is a salary gap between shorter and taller men, everything else being equal.
Also, you seem to be under the notion that acknowledging height discrimination somehow negates or takes importance from discrimination against women. It does not. Not only that, but height discrimination also affects women, it is not men-exclusive and it goes well beyond dating preferences. Shorter women also tend to earn less money than their taller counterparts for the same work.
You are disregarding all studies presented in front of you because "correlation", but then you make claims such as "There are negatives to being short but it's not actually affecting someone too much", please show us your references and sources for those claims. We have show you ours.
Because a) it does not only appear in dating preferences, and b) it is a form of sexism.
Height discrimination comes from the sexist idea that men should be big, strong and dominant as a response of women being small, fragile and submissive. When men are too short (or women too tall) they not longer adhere to those conceptions and then they are attacked because of that.
When you ask many women why do they find taller men attractive, many answer that it's "because they feel feminine and protected". In reality they find them attractive just because tall height is an attractive trait in men, but they come with the excuse of feeling protected because of pre-determined gender roles on how a woman cannot protect herself and needs a bigger, stronger man to be safe.
Uh how do you do this? Asking for a friend >.>
... What? What are you asking?
No one is financially ruined just because of their height, just like no woman is financially ruined because of being a woman. That does not mean a salary gap does not exist, and in both cases it does. There is research on this area. Research conducted on a certain topic has much more weight than any anecdotes (because they are just that, anecdotes), and it is easily accessible online in psychology journals, especially those that study behaviour. Studies show that height in men affect how they are socially perceived , and also that it does influence hiring decisions (taller men are more likely to be considered positively in hiring and other screening processes). And there is a salary gap between shorter and taller men, everything else being equal.
Also, you seem to be under the notion that acknowledging height discrimination somehow negates or takes importance from discrimination against women. It does not. Not only that, but height discrimination also affects women, it is not men-exclusive and it goes well beyond dating preferences. Shorter women also tend to earn less money than their taller counterparts for the same work.
You are disregarding all studies presented in front of you because "correlation", but then you make claims such as "There are negatives to being short but it's not actually affecting someone too much", please show us your references and sources for those claims. We have show you ours.
Because a) it does not only appear in dating preferences, and b) it is a form of sexism.
Height discrimination comes from the sexist idea that men should be big, strong and dominant as a response of women being small, fragile and submissive. When men are too short (or women too tall) they not longer adhere to those conceptions and then they are attacked because of that.
When you ask many women why do they find taller men attractive, many answer that it's "because they feel feminine and protected". In reality they find them attractive just because tall height is an attractive trait in men, but they come with the excuse of feeling protected because of pre-determined gender roles on how a woman cannot protect herself and needs a bigger, stronger man to be safe.
We can find stories, articles, etc of many individual women who legit see effects of the beauty standard from crazy dieting, bulimia, obesity, cosmetic surgery, etc. We see more than statistics of an inch being worth 2.6%. Anecdotes help because we see past correlation, causation, etc. It's why when you do statistics you need proof of it IE men with the name Jamal won't be hired as much as someone named Jeremy, so when we show stories of employers throwing away resumes of Jamal we see the damage. You need a face to put with the statistics or how does anyone know if anyone is affected a whole lot?
I believe everyone needs to be able to accept a certain amount of harm because the world isn't 100% fair; so when someone says their life is impacted a lot by being 5'6 but they're decently off in life I scratch my head. Sure, you're facing some issues but it's not wrecking you emotionally, mentally, socially, or financially -- at best you're seeing minimal reductions in quality of life (something you probably wouldn't even notice if you were 6'1). I can read the statistics just fine, I'm just hoping there's faces to go with this huge problem so I can see the damage.
I stopped taking tinder seriously, now I just put a picture of a hot dude and just keep on swiping to see how many matches I can get. Currently at 250 matches lmao.
Just head to settings, delete profile and remake it. You lose all your matches / messages.
And i'd disagree that Tinder is not the part of the problem, Tinder has a clear interest in the continued success of its software and will act to that end, i doubt, with care for the mental health of its subset of users that suffers particularly for it.
Everyone is shallow. That's the big joke about the height movement. A guy can lambaste a woman for being shallow because she wants a 6'0+ man but then he'll say, "shave your legs", "wear make-up", "why are you fat?!"
Then the argument of "YOU CAN'T CHANGE HEIGHT!!!!" comes in and it's still nonsense because 1) it's a standard whether or not you want to argue and 2) it's not affecting your life like the beauty standards women face.
We can find stories, articles, etc of many individual women who legit see effects of the beauty standard from crazy dieting, bulimia, obesity, cosmetic surgery, etc. We see more than statistics of an inch being worth 2.6%. Anecdotes help because we see past correlation, causation, etc. It's why when you do statistics you need proof of it IE men with the name Jamal won't be hired as much as someone named Jeremy, so when we show stories of employers throwing away resumes of Jamal we see the damage. You need a face to put with the statistics or how does anyone know if anyone is affected a whole lot?
I believe everyone needs to be able to accept a certain amount of harm because the world isn't 100% fair; so when someone says their life is impacted a lot by being 5'6 but they're decently off in life, I scratch my head. Sure, you're facing some issues but it's not wrecking you emotionally, mentally, socially, or financially -- at best you're seeing minimal reductions in quality of life (something you probably wouldn't even notice if you were 6'1). I can read the statistics just fine, I'm just hoping there's faces to go with this huge problem so I can see the damage.
This is pretty weird bruh
I stopped taking tinder seriously, now I just put a picture of a hot dude and just keep on swiping to see how many matches I can get. Currently at 250 matches lmao.
Restart your account. There are algorithms in place that most people don't know about. Not sending a message to a match, unmatching immediately, swiping right on everyone, etc. puts you at the back of the queue because the behavior hurts their product. Restarting your account resets it. For reference, my 5'6 self has gotten over 100 matches in the last two weeks since restarting my account.
It's a meta game, not hard to understand.
I'm sure the same people would be annoyed if they matched with someone who ended up being a bot/catfish/fraud/just using the app for an esteem boost with zero intention of dating, too.I just dont understand what could possibly be fun about it. Ogling girls that will never date you? Idk.
Stop putting your height into your profile then and you won't have any problems except for bad pictures which you should get help from your friends from. There will be matches.
On the internet, no one can see how mad you actually are at a computer before calming down cause you're mad at a computer.
You know, you normally see people disregarding anecdotic evidence in favour of statistical, research-based evidence. It's the first time in my life that I see someone disregard the latter in favour of the former. Anecdotic evidence is pretty much worthless when trying to prove a phenomenon.
What you're saying is not too different from someone coming with the news that, for example, 30% of women in x place suffer from domestic abuse and someone saying "that cannot be true because I never heard any woman in x complaining about their husband hitting her". It's completely senseless.
But if you're so keen on having anecdotes, what about this 14-year-old boy who comitted suicide after years of relentless bullying because of his small stature. I do not like having to bring such tragic events for the sake of an argument, and I shouldn't have to, because in normal discussions researched data is what most people accept.
Anecdotic evidence about other types of height-based discrimination is hard to come by because people tend not to be very open to share it - which is logical given how many people like you disregard it as a non-issue. But the studies and the data is out there.
You can tell it's cuffing season. Tinder matches be getting lower and lower
what the! i had to look this up but it made me realize all my relationships started in fall :O
Restart your account. There are algorithms in place that most people don't know about. Not sending a message to a match, unmatching immediately, swiping right on everyone, etc. puts you at the back of the queue because the behavior hurts their product. Restarting your account resets it. For reference, my 5'6 self has gotten over 100 matches in the last two weeks since restarting my account.
Actually, the bad thing is that I now have too many matches that maintaining multiple conversations is a hassle. I forget to actually respond to women who then probably think I've ghosted them.
Yup, this wasn't the case as much pre-tinder but in a post-tinder world, even on older dating sites, this is now the thing. The behavior swing changes it to more of a numbers game; it's more logical to message multiple women than to focus on one who has multiple guys sending her a message. Example: I spent half a day going and back forth bantering with a girl. We were super compatible with the chat, I asked her out, she was excited and said yes. I proposed the place and she then stopped responding. lol
Anecdotes help show how real and present the phenomenon is. When you say 30% of women in X face domestic abuse, there will be stories of it regardless because those stories make up the statistics, in a way. It's why a lot of these height studies are correlation.
It's horrible what happened to Lamar Hawkins III, it's unfortunate because children born with medical conditions are usually easy targets for bullies. This gives insight into how height discrimination works and is good to know.
When folks point to men making 2.6% more per inch, or how they're not hired as often, etc. it paints a scary picture for short men. You also have to consider that I'm not speaking for little people or people with medical issues (because it's well known they really don't get a fair shake), but more towards the men who are about 5'4 to, like, 5'8 who believe everything is because of their height and that being 6'2 will fix everything. It's not that I 100% don't believe in height discrimination exists (I do you can see many stats and examples for how little people are treated) but that there's a group of vocal men out there who use it as a cover to say they've failed at X because of it -- and it's usually brought up when dating is involved. Hopefully that helps you understand where I'm coming from.