Tom Brady's Suspension Appeal News

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gigglepoo

Member
The NFL never bothered to investigate the kickers and find any potentially incriminating texts and calls to the ballboys. Also, the kickers weren't dicks to Goodell and the NFL and called them liars in public. (See earlier post about Brady being punished for basically being a dick in Goodell's eyes)

Also, not super relevant, but you could argue that the kickers were going from having control over their footballs to having to use brand new balls, while in this case, QBs were given way more control over their footballs in the past, but still Brady screwed around with them. Since Brady and Manning were two of the staunchest folks arguing for QBs being able to mess with their footballs during home games, Goodell may think that Brady got the rule changed just so he could mess with the footballs more.

Hence what it feels as though Brady is being railroaded here.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
If you are referring to the 2006 rule change, it was about the preparation of footballs for away games and not home games (they were already allowed to prepare and use footballs for home games).

Ah my bad, switched home and road there.

Hence what it feels as though Brady is being railroaded here.

Brady got railroaded because he called the NFL liars and dared them to come after him. The kickers never held a press conference declaring their innocence.

Brady appears to be a sanctimonious ass in this situation, and is getting himself lit up by the NFL because he was one.
 

msdstc

Incredibly Naive
Ah my bad, switched home and road there.



Brady got railroaded because he called the NFL liars and dared them to come after him. The kickers never held a press conference declaring their innocence.

Brady appears to be a sanctimonious ass in this situation, and is getting himself lit up by the NFL because he was one.

Yeah with false or sensationalised information and controlled leaks.
 

Gigglepoo

Member
Brady got railroaded because he called the NFL liars and dared them to come after him. The kickers never held a press conference declaring their innocence.

Brady appears to be a sanctimonious ass in this situation, and is getting himself lit up by the NFL because he was one.

We definitely agree there.
 

Troy

Banned
Ah my bad, switched home and road there.



Brady got railroaded because he called the NFL liars and dared them to come after him. The kickers never held a press conference declaring their innocence.

Brady appears to be a sanctimonious ass in this situation, and is getting himself lit up by the NFL because he was one.

He held a press conference to defend himself after the NFL purposely leaked lies about the situation. So he's right. They are liars. Goodell even lied again last month when he said Brady claimed to have never talked to the equipment guys about the situation. That's not sanctimonious. That's called defending yourself.
 

ParityBit

Member
He held a press conference to defend himself after the NFL purposely leaked lies about the situation. So he's right. They are liars. Goodell even lied again last month when he said Brady claimed to have never talked to the equipment guys about the situation. That's not sanctimonious. That's called defending yourself.

He lied in Canton. When asked why the NFL did nothing about the tweet his 5th and 6th words were "Independent investigation" after saying it was not independent!
 

Spinluck

Member
CMOYcQ4WoAA2MT-.jpg

Tom without makeup.
 

GashPrex

NeoGaf-Gold™ Member
An interview with the sketch artist:

Jeez, I feel bad for her now. These drawings are always kind of ugly-looking; her depiction was probably going to get reamed regardless of how good or bad it was, just due to the attention being paid to this story (and the fact that no mere drawing could do Lord Brady justice).

Oh come, that's like the worst fucking drawing ever. He doesn't even look human in that picture. Its her job to draw and she sucks at it apparently. I suck at drawing but I don't make it my occupation.
 

Spinluck

Member
I never see them unless you knuckleheads quote him, which irritates me greatly.

Oh

NFL QB is one of the most powerful positions in the league.

Star Franchise NFL QB have even greater power.

To believe that two equipment guys were tampering with Brady's balls without his permission is ridiculous.

To pretend that Brady was ignorant or not keenly aware of what was going on with the instruments he uses to perform his job, for which Brady along with Manning lobbied the league to control, is preposterous. It's a joke argument.

Brady could win this, but only because Roger Goodell and the NFL are equally buffoonish cheats that hold the same amount of care for the integrity of the game of football as the New England Patriots.

The NFL punted away their moral high ground when they let the Patriots play in the sham bowl in February. Taking the same course of inaction they took when the Patriots cheated their way to three Super Bowls in the early 2000s.

Always too little too late or not at all. A league that covered up the Ray Rice incident, and burned all evidence that could be retrieved in SpyGate.

The commissioner deserves the same fate as Belichick, Kraft, and Brady. Banishment.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
He held a press conference to defend himself after the NFL purposely leaked lies about the situation. So he's right. They are liars. Goodell even lied again last month when he said Brady claimed to have never talked to the equipment guys about the situation. That's not sanctimonious. That's called defending yourself.

He said he was "completely innocent". Once he said that it went from defending to sanctimony. Brady also flat out lied about why he destroyed the phone. (Kessler admitted today it was directly in response to the Wells request)

He pissed off the commissioner without being as pure as the driven snow. As anyone can tell you - the NFL will unload on you at that point. Those press conferences during the SB were a bad idea.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
He said he was "completely innocent". Once he said that it went from defending to sanctimony. Brady also flat out lied about why he destroyed the phone. (Kessler admitted today it was directly in response to the Wells request)

He pissed off the commissioner without being as pure as the driven snow. As anyone can tell you - the NFL will unload on you at that point. Those press conferences during the SB were a bad idea.

Orly?

In this thread i heard it's just a normal thing celebrities do and had nothing to do with the request. I learned lots of amazing facts in this thread.
 

Quotient

Member
He said he was "completely innocent". Once he said that it went from defending to sanctimony. Brady also flat out lied about why he destroyed the phone. (Kessler admitted today it was directly in response to the Wells request)

He pissed off the commissioner without being as pure as the driven snow. As anyone can tell you - the NFL will unload on you at that point. Those press conferences during the SB were a bad idea.

I didn't hear anything about this - you got a link?
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
"The judge also questioned why Brady destroyed his cellphone in the midst of the inquiry -- a move that the league argues was further proof of his deception. Kessler claimed that the quarterback got rid of the phone on the advice of his agent to protect his privacy but had otherwise cooperated with the inquiry. However, in hindsight, "You're right, it could have been done a different way,'' the lawyer said of the phone."

Basically his agent told him to destroy the phone due to "privacy fears". It was not some regularly scheduled destruction schedule. Even Kessler admitted that Brady messed up on the cooperation part. The judge is smartly setting up a compromise where Brady is punished at a reduce rate for non-cooperation but doesn't have to admit guilt.

Was also part of the tweeting that the ny daily news reporter did iirc.
 

msdstc

Incredibly Naive
"The judge also questioned why Brady destroyed his cellphone in the midst of the inquiry -- a move that the league argues was further proof of his deception. Kessler claimed that the quarterback got rid of the phone on the advice of his agent to protect his privacy but had otherwise cooperated with the inquiry. However, in hindsight, "You're right, it could have been done a different way,'' the lawyer said of the phone."

Basically his agent told him to destroy the phone due to "privacy fears". It was not some regularly scheduled destruction schedule. Even Kessler admitted that Brady messed up on the cooperation part. The judge is smartly setting up a compromise where Brady is punished at a reduce rate for non-cooperation but doesn't have to admit guilt.

Was also part of the tweeting that the ny daily news reporter did iirc.

Uhh, he routinely destroys phones, this statement in no way contradicts what has been said.
 

gatti-man

Member
"The judge also questioned why Brady destroyed his cellphone in the midst of the inquiry -- a move that the league argues was further proof of his deception. Kessler claimed that the quarterback got rid of the phone on the advice of his agent to protect his privacy but had otherwise cooperated with the inquiry. However, in hindsight, "You're right, it could have been done a different way,'' the lawyer said of the phone."

Basically his agent told him to destroy the phone due to "privacy fears". It was not some regularly scheduled destruction schedule. Even Kessler admitted that Brady messed up on the cooperation part. The judge is smartly setting up a compromise where Brady is punished at a reduce rate for non-cooperation but doesn't have to admit guilt.

Was also part of the tweeting that the ny daily news reporter did iirc.
Yeah this. Tom Brady is a millionaire celebrity pro football player. Imagine what's on his damn cell phone. I'd destroy that shit too. It's ridiculous he had to hand it over anyways since the NFL already had the texts! It's a ridiculous invasion of privacy.
 

KHarvey16

Member
Yes I do actually. The Courts will approach it from the point of view that the agreed Labor arbitration is valid, the NFLPA will need to convince the Judge that it isn't. That's the point people keep making which you seem to fail to grasp.

What? No. What they're saying is that he isn't following what was agreed to, not that what was agreed to isn't valid.

Of course the NFLPA is arguing that Goodell breached the CBA, because given the way it's written he's got near absolute power as arbitrator. If there's no procedural breakdown then there's no case. There would literally be no argument, outside of a defamation case, without a claim that the CBA was not being adhered to, but that's pretty much the same in every Labor dispute where there is collective bargaining. The fact remains there's a fucking massive burden to pass for those cases in the Federal court system. Federal judges by and large stick with an arbitrated process even when it's pretty shoddy (although what's probably in the NFLPA's favor is that it's rare that fucking management is also the arbitrator that brings an inherent unfairness to proceedings but then NFLPA are the silly fuckers who agreed to it in the first place). I know you seem to dislike people saying that, but it doesn't make it any less true.

There are specific requirements laid out in the CBA that were not followed.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
Yeah this. Tom Brady is a millionaire celebrity pro football player. Imagine what's on his damn cell phone. I'd destroy that shit too. It's ridiculous he had to hand it over anyways since the NFL already had the texts! It's a ridiculous invasion of privacy.


http://deadspin.com/the-full-story-of-tom-bradys-destroyed-cell-phone-1722190784

They didn't even want the cell phone. They just wanted someone from Brady's side to run a search on the cell phone and provide the returns (a search they ran on other cell phones just fine but not the phone used during the time of period of investigation).


Uhh, he routinely destroys phones, this statement in no way contradicts what has been said.

He told the commish it was just coincidental timing. Kessler admitted that it was not. The privacy concerns are legit; but lying (or obfuscating) about the "coincidence" is a bad look.
 

Quotient

Member
"The judge also questioned why Brady destroyed his cellphone in the midst of the inquiry -- a move that the league argues was further proof of his deception. Kessler claimed that the quarterback got rid of the phone on the advice of his agent to protect his privacy but had otherwise cooperated with the inquiry. However, in hindsight, "You're right, it could have been done a different way,'' the lawyer said of the phone."

Basically his agent told him to destroy the phone due to "privacy fears". It was not some regularly scheduled destruction schedule. Even Kessler admitted that Brady messed up on the cooperation part. The judge is smartly setting up a compromise where Brady is punished at a reduce rate for non-cooperation but doesn't have to admit guilt.

Was also part of the tweeting that the ny daily news reporter did iirc.

That doesn't contradict what Brady or his agent stated.

Yee said that the Brady "voluntarily disclosed to the league" that he had cycled through this cell phone prior to his March meeting with Wells, and that Brady also indicated that it is a regular practice of his to delete emails and texts from his phone "as a safeguard," something Yee advises his clients of as a general practice. "Given Tom's public status, to ever lose phone and have texts and emails on there would be significant consequences from a publicity standpoint," Yee said.
 

msdstc

Incredibly Naive
http://deadspin.com/the-full-story-of-tom-bradys-destroyed-cell-phone-1722190784

They didn't even want the cell phone. They just wanted someone from Brady's side to run a search on the cell phone and provide the returns (a search they ran on other cell phones just fine but not the phone used during the time of period of investigation).




He told the commish it was just coincidental timing. Kessler admitted that it was not. The privacy concerns are legit; but lying (or obfuscating) about the "coincidence" is a bad look.

Agreed, inconsistencies like this poke holes in a persons credibility
 

Quotient

Member
Brady got railroaded because he called the NFL liars and dared them to come after him. The kickers never held a press conference declaring their innocence.

Brady appears to be a sanctimonious ass in this situation, and is getting himself lit up by the NFL because he was one.

Brady has talked about deflategate twice - once at the Patriots press conference the day after mortensen infamous tweet "11 of 12 balls 2 psi under" and his facebook statement the day after Goodell upheld the suspension. In both scenarios Brady claimed his innocence, which apparently if i understand what you are saying is enough to annoy the NFL.
 

Quotient

Member
Brady told the commish per Wells that the phone being recycled at the time was coincidence. Kessler said it was due to privacy fears because of Wells.

I didn't read it that way, but regardless of his reasons, it should in no way be reason for a suspension.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
Brady has talked about deflategate twice - once at the Patriots press conference the day after mortensen infamous tweet "11 of 12 balls 2 psi under" and his facebook statement the day after Goodell upheld the suspension. In both scenarios Brady claimed his innocence, which apparently if i understand what you are saying is enough to annoy the NFL.

Roger Goodell being super petty and super vengeful? NEVER. This has never had anything to do with the integrity of the game. It was Brady calling out Goodell; Goodell getting pissed, Brady probably being guilty (which is all Goodell needs), and Goodell laying down a pissed off hammer.

I mean; this was the natural consequence of the NFL fan base believing the NFL was full of thugs / needing to be put in "line" in the early 2000s. They wanted Harvey dent and they got Harvey Dent.
 

Quotient

Member
Roger Goodell being super petty and super vengeful? NEVER. This has never had anything to do with the integrity of the game. It was Brady calling out Goodell; Goodell getting pissed, Brady probably being guilty (which is all Goodell needs), and Goodell laying down a pissed off hammer.

I mean; this was the natural consequence of the NFL fan base believing the NFL was full of thugs / needing to be put in "line" in the early 2000s. They wanted Harvey dent and they got Harvey Dent.

I am curious how/when did Brady "call out Goodell"?
 

Quotient

Member
The phone is just a red herring. Seeing all the stuff the Patriots and Brady, there was no reason to need that phone.

Of course it was, it was mentioned more times in Goodell's statement than the word deflate - if i remember correctly 'destroyed' was mentioned 17 times while 'deflate' was mentioned 5 times.
 

msdstc

Incredibly Naive
So something that's not clear to me. I've read multiple times that brady's texts were recovered and basically consistent with what was on Mcnally and JJs phones. (outside of 3 texts post superbowl, and apparently were recovered from other phones anyways) Why would he allow that to happen if he really didn't want to give up the texts?
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
Because a) of the three texts and b) they want to see if he talked to anyone not McNally and Jastremski about the footballs.
 

msdstc

Incredibly Naive
Because a) of the three texts and b) they want to see if he talked to anyone not McNally and Jastremski about the footballs.

Weren't those 3 texts on JJs phone? And that was also after the story broke, would he really text about it after the drop?
 

msdstc

Incredibly Naive
A) no
B) it was also the several months BEFORE the colts game that was on the phone that was destroyed.

I'm saying those 3 texts that were missing were post superbowl were they not? I'm not arguing I'm trying to understand that's just what I've read.

edit- I'm saying weren't a lot of the texts from that destroyed phone recovered?

editedit- I'm refering to this article on

"Brady was able to obtain a log of all his phone calls and text messages, and since he had not changed phone numbers, this included calls and messages during the mysterious four-month gap. These were cross-referenced against communications listed in the Wells Report, and for the most part (with the exception of three missing texts) they matched, as Wells was given access to both Jastremski and McNally’s Patriots-supplied work phones. This is one of Brady’s strongest arguments that there are no missing damaging text messages: since Wells had access to Jastremski and McNally’s side of any damning conversations with Brady, why did he need Brady’s messages?

Of course, Wells wasn’t solely looking for Brady’s communication with Jastremski and McNally, but also whether he had used a variety of deflation-related terms with anybody else. And as pointed out in the NFL’s questioning of Brady, there are also three texts exchanged with Jastremski on February 7 that do not appear in the Wells Report"

http://deadspin.com/the-full-story-of-tom-bradys-destroyed-cell-phone-1722190784
 

Aylinato

Member
All text messages were accounted for via text logs and with the staffs phones. Anyone saying Brady withheld his phone because of balls are correct, but not footballs.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
I'm saying those 3 texts that were missing were post superbowl were they not? I'm not arguing I'm trying to understand that's just what I've read.

edit- I'm saying weren't a lot of the texts from that destroyed phone recovered?

editedit- I'm refering to this article on

"Brady was able to obtain a log of all his phone calls and text messages, and since he had not changed phone numbers, this included calls and messages during the mysterious four-month gap. These were cross-referenced against communications listed in the Wells Report, and for the most part (with the exception of three missing texts) they matched, as Wells was given access to both Jastremski and McNally’s Patriots-supplied work phones. This is one of Brady’s strongest arguments that there are no missing damaging text messages: since Wells had access to Jastremski and McNally’s side of any damning conversations with Brady, why did he need Brady’s messages?

Of course, Wells wasn’t solely looking for Brady’s communication with Jastremski and McNally, but also whether he had used a variety of deflation-related terms with anybody else. And as pointed out in the NFL’s questioning of Brady, there are also three texts exchanged with Jastremski on February 7 that do not appear in the Wells Report"

http://deadspin.com/the-full-story-of-tom-bradys-destroyed-cell-phone-1722190784

The three post SB were never recovered from any side. The bigger issue would be if he texted anyone else about it. He could have told an assistant to tell mcnally and jas; and they would never find it. Only the texts to JJ and McNally could be seen for content; he got the log of the messages from that phone; not what was sent in the messages themselves.


All text messages were accounted for via text logs and with the staffs phones. Anyone saying Brady withheld his phone because of balls are correct, but not footballs.

Wrong. They got a log of who he sent text messages to and called at certain times; but the actual content of the messages were not in the log. Only McNally and JJ's side of the texts could be read and that is because those two had NFL given phones that had been secured.
 

msdstc

Incredibly Naive
The three post SB were never recovered from any side. The bigger issue would be if he texted anyone else about it. He could have told an assistant to tell mcnally and jas; and they would never find it. Only the texts to JJ and McNally could be seen for content; he got the log of the messages from that phone; not what was sent in the messages themselves.




Wrong. They got a log of who he sent text messages to and called at certain times; but the actual content of the messages were not in the log. Only McNally and JJ's side of the texts could be read and that is because those two had NFL given phones that had been secured.

There's a lot of speculation at play, but it does add credence to the idea that he covered up information.
 

Aylinato

Member
The three post SB were never recovered from any side. The bigger issue would be if he texted anyone else about it. He could have told an assistant to tell mcnally and jas; and they would never find it. Only the texts to JJ and McNally could be seen for content; he got the log of the messages from that phone; not what was sent in the messages themselves.




Wrong. They got a log of who he sent text messages to and called at certain times; but the actual content of the messages were not in the log. Only McNally and JJ's side of the texts could be read and that is because those two had NFL given phones that had been secured.



No it's more likely he's having an affair.
 

BobLoblaw

Banned
Wrong text being referred to. Please understand wtf you are talking about first.

http://deadspin.com/the-full-story-of-tom-bradys-destroyed-cell-phone-1722190784
In one text from May 2014, McNally called himself "the deflator."
This is wtf I'm talking about. Regardless, they still found nothing from any of the phones and their argument (even mentioned in court today) is that Brady's complicity was due to the term "Deflator" being used.

Fact is, there is no evidence that Brady was involved. None. There's a lot of circumstantial stuff, but that's it. Hell, if the equipment guy did deflate the balls, the ideal gas law still would've occurred and the balls would've been even more (obviously) deflated. Their PSI was in line with what would be expected under normal circumstances and none of this "missing texts" or "destroyed" cell phone talk can prove otherwise.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
This is wtf I'm talking about. Regardless, they still found nothing from any of the phones and their argument (even mentioned in court today) is that Brady's complicity was due to the term "Deflator" being used.

Fact is, there is no evidence that Brady was involved. None. There's a lot of circumstantial stuff, but that's it. Hell, if the equipment guy did deflate the balls, the ideal gas law still would've occurred and the balls would've been even more (obviously) deflated. Their PSI was in line with what would be expected under normal circumstances and none of this "missing texts" or "destroyed" cell phone talk can prove otherwise.

The deflator text has nothing to do with the three missing texts.

Unfortunately for Brady; this isn't a court of law. There's no standard of incontrovertible proof. Wells report even said it. The commissioners powers don't require it. Circumstantial evidence is just fine. It's how they suspended Big Ben. It's how they suspend a lot of players they can't get 100% proof for. It's how they suspended Sean Payton for a year. No different now.

Also; the misuse of the ideal gas law is hilarious. The loss isn't instantaneous and is based on the containing material - and that's the part of the science everyone forgets. If it were; the colts balls would have similarly deflated in the same period of time. But they didn't.
 

Aylinato

Member
The deflator text has nothing to do with the three missing texts.

Unfortunately for Brady; this isn't a court of law. There's no standard of incontrovertible proof. Wells report even said it. The commissioners powers don't require it. Circumstantial evidence is just fine. It's how they suspended Big Ben. It's how they suspend a lot of players they can't get 100% proof for. It's how they suspended Sean Payton for a year. No different now.

Also; the misuse of the ideal gas law is hilarious. The loss isn't instantaneous and is based on the containing material - and that's the part of the science everyone forgets. If it were; the colts balls would have similarly deflated in the same period of time. But they didn't.



Actually if the stadium was a different temp the pats balls are fine but the colts were over inflated.

Course no one really took notice what temp the stadium was at. Because there's barely any evidence in the first place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom