thetrin said:I'm more excited for Mythos than Too Human. Does that mean anything?
Yes, that you prefer a free game.
lulz
thetrin said:I'm more excited for Mythos than Too Human. Does that mean anything?
C4Lukins said:You are either being intentionally dense or you lack some basic reasoning skills is completely lacking. The number of games they have released is not important in that equation. What matters is how highly rated the best of those games was. Eternal Darkness is a 92 on metacritic, so if the game is more widely acclaimed then that, this would be pretty damn good. I bet you could have figured that out on your own, at least I hope so.
Sir Fragula said:Who's "Chern"??
You forgot the people who are taking this waaaaay too seriously.Busty said:I love how this thread is divided into five distinct camps.
1) People who are looking forward to the game.
2) People who are no longer looking forward to the game.
3) People who were never looking forward to this game.
4) People who are desperately trying to defend Dyack in the misguided hope he'll PM them and ask them to be interns at his studio over the summer.
5) People who think that Dyack is madder than a bag of cats....but rich enough to get away with it.
LCfiner said:I'm amazed this thread exists. Just ridiculous. Is Dennis making a tally on a legal notepad with all our names? And then drawing frowny penis-heads on the people who are against it?
Anyway, I suppose, based on the art and the bits of gameplay that I've seen, I'll put myself down as Against. If the game turns out great then, cool.
this. This. THIS. Make a 4P co-op patch Dyack, and all will be forgiven.GhaleonEB said:This is a good point. I had the same reaction watching the video when it came out, and it flies in the face of claims that the co-op was simply "too hectic" and the cut is somehow beneficial. The class and ability design seem crafted with four players in mind, and dropping it to two doesn't just decrease the party, it impacts the way parties can be balanced. Some branches on those skill trees just don't make sense with only two players.
Hero said:Wow, coming into our forum just to stir shit in the pot is certainly a ballsy move. I certainly wonder what your PR department thinks of your attitude. But I guess that's what this is all about, isn't it? You're just trying to call us out and make us rush out and buy your game so we can have a qualified opinion which is of course reasonable. Is your game in that bad of shape that you need to do a little sales pitch at GAF?
Are you that scared of Silicon Knights' future if this game flops? Nintendo dumped you and Microsoft took a shot with you, after this all you have is Sony to rely on.
How about the criteria needs to be that Too Human needs to score higher than Eternal Darkness on BOTH Metacritic and Gamerankings (since you said it's the best game you ever made) as well as be in the top 10 reviewed games of the 2008 (since you said it's probably going to be better than any other game this year) and must not have any huge backlash on most of the big forums (IGN, Gamespot, Gamefaqs, etc. since you said most people will love the game).
You think your one tag is equivalent to getting a bunch of people a tag? Why don't you "put up or shut up?" If you lose the bet why not have a splash image of the NeoGAF logo on the Silicon Knights' homepage with the subtitle "owned" and linked to this very thread?
WrikaWrek said:BOING
Hero said:How about the criteria needs to be that Too Human needs to score higher than Eternal Darkness on BOTH Metacritic and Gamerankings (since you said it's the best game you ever made)
:lol :lol :lolWilly Wanka said:More developers should tell GAF's trolls to go fuck themselves. It makes for great entertainment :lol
Hero said:Wow, coming into our forum just to stir shit in the pot is certainly a ballsy move.
That's a lavish idea but not especially worthwhile to anyone involved.Hero said:You think your one tag is equivalent to getting a bunch of people a tag? Why don't you "put up or shut up?" If you lose the bet why not have a splash image of the NeoGAF logo on the Silicon Knights' homepage with the subtitle "owned" and linked to this very thread?
I will give props for the big hairy cojones it takes to try and call people out
slasher_thrasher21 said:Well at the rate the posts and views are going on this page, I wouldnt say it bad PR persay.:lol
Hero said:Wow, coming into our forum just to stir shit in the pot is certainly a ballsy move. I certainly wonder what your PR department thinks of your attitude. But I guess that's what this is all about, isn't it? You're just trying to call us out and make us rush out and buy your game so we can have a qualified opinion which is of course reasonable. Is your game in that bad of shape that you need to do a little sales pitch at GAF?
Are you that scared of Silicon Knights' future if this game flops? Nintendo dumped you and Microsoft took a shot with you, after this all you have is Sony to rely on.
How about the criteria needs to be that Too Human needs to score higher than Eternal Darkness on BOTH Metacritic and Gamerankings (since you said it's the best game you ever made) as well as be in the top 10 reviewed games of the 2008 (since you said it's probably going to be better than any other game this year) and must not have any huge backlash on most of the big forums (IGN, Gamespot, Gamefaqs, etc. since you said most people will love the game).
You think your one tag is equivalent to getting a bunch of people a tag? Why don't you "put up or shut up?" If you lose the bet why not have a splash image of the NeoGAF logo on the Silicon Knights' homepage with the subtitle "owned" and linked to this very thread?
Doodis said:I ownz the internetz.
Pretty much totally agree.CowboyAstronaut said:Why are some people questioning whether he has the right to make a thread asking who is for and who is against his game? If I'm the developer of a game that has gotten so much attention on this site and so many others, mostly negative, I would probably like a thread to end all threads to see what people are thinking about my product at the end of a long, sometimes painful process as well.
I don't see what's wrong with Denis feeling that Too Human will be one of the best games that come out this entire year. Nothing wrong with that at all. When someone like Itagaki says things like other developers are going to lose their motivation or that they should probably give up before they get embarrassed or something like that, I don't see the same treatment for him. Or maybe what most like to get off on is the fact that Denis actually posts here so he's more akin to fresh meat that everybody can pile on at a moments notice since there is a large possibility he will read your disrespectful comment.
If Kojima and any other developer goes and says something extremely bold about the quality of the game they are currently making, people go insane with their praises and adoration. Now I may be in small company, but I think Denis deserves a lot more respect than he usually gets around here. Criticisms where they make sense are valid, but most of the criticism he has gotten is fueled by the infatuation to troll anything related to Denis Dyack with reckless abandon and not for any other reason. Insults will touch on anything from his weight to how little he knows about game development, despite him being far more knowledgeable on the subject than they are.
With all the negativity around not just Dyack, but his game as well, it's really refreshing to see that the man hasn't allowed any of it to deter him.
J. M. Romeo said:For. But you are on thin ice asking this question here. Hope you got either thick skin or a shitload of armor
Hero said:Wow, coming into our forum just to stir shit in the pot is certainly a ballsy move. I certainly wonder what your PR department thinks of your attitude. But I guess that's what this is all about, isn't it? You're just trying to call us out and make us rush out and buy your game so we can have a qualified opinion which is of course reasonable. Is your game in that bad of shape that you need to do a little sales pitch at GAF?
Are you that scared of Silicon Knights' future if this game flops? Nintendo dumped you and Microsoft took a shot with you, after this all you have is Sony to rely on.
How about the criteria needs to be that Too Human needs to score higher than Eternal Darkness on BOTH Metacritic and Gamerankings (since you said it's the best game you ever made) as well as be in the top 10 reviewed games of the 2008 (since you said it's probably going to be better than any other game this year) and must not have any huge backlash on most of the big forums (IGN, Gamespot, Gamefaqs, etc. since you said most people will love the game).
You think your one tag is equivalent to getting a bunch of people a tag? Why don't you "put up or shut up?" If you lose the bet why not have a splash image of the NeoGAF logo on the Silicon Knights' homepage with the subtitle "owned" and linked to this very thread?
People flame the shit out of him all the damn time over what he says.CowboyAstronaut said:I don't see what's wrong with Denis feeling that Too Human will be one of the best games that come out this entire year. Nothing wrong with that at all. When someone like Itagaki says things like other developers are going to lose their motivation or that they should probably give up before they get embarrassed or something like that, I don't see the same treatment for him. Or maybe what most like to get off on is the fact that Denis actually posts here so he's more akin to fresh meat that everybody can pile on at a moments notice since there is a large possibility he will read your disrespectful comment.
So that's why he made this thread, then, huh?CowboyAstronaut said:With all the negativity around not just Dyack, but his game as well, it's really refreshing to see that the man hasn't allowed any of it to deter him.
CowboyAstronaut said:With all the negativity around not just Dyack, but his game as well, it's really refreshing to see that the man hasn't allowed any of it to deter him.
TheOneGuy said:So that's why he made this thread, then, huh?
Zilch said:So.... "against"?
CowboyAstronaut said:Why are some people questioning whether he has the right to make a thread asking who is for and who is against his game? If I'm the developer of a game that has gotten so much attention on this site and so many others, mostly negative, I would probably like a thread to end all threads to see what people are thinking about my product at the end of a long, sometimes painful process as well.
I don't see what's wrong with Denis feeling that Too Human will be one of the best games that come out this entire year. Nothing wrong with that at all. When someone like Itagaki says things like other developers are going to lose their motivation or that they should probably give up before they get embarrassed or something like that, I don't see the same treatment for him. Or maybe what most like to get off on is the fact that Denis actually posts here so he's more akin to fresh meat that everybody can pile on at a moments notice since there is a large possibility he will read your disrespectful comment.
If Kojima and any other developer goes and says something extremely bold about the quality of the game they are currently making, people go insane with their praises and adoration. Now I may be in small company, but I think Denis deserves a lot more respect than he usually gets around here. Criticisms where they make sense are valid, but most of the criticism he has gotten is fueled by the infatuation to troll anything related to Denis Dyack with reckless abandon and not for any other reason. Insults will touch on anything from his weight to how little he knows about game development, despite him being far more knowledgeable on the subject than they are.
With all the negativity around not just Dyack, but his game as well, it's really refreshing to see that the man hasn't allowed any of it to deter him.
Edit :: Hero just pulled a "How dare you come on our forum" on him. He takes a lot of pride in his trolling. :lol
Busty said:In a way I agree with you. Dyack is confronting the Too Human 'infamy' that's going on around not just this forum but seemingly the web as a whole.
However, there is a way and means to doing this sort of thing....and frankly Dyack couldn't have gone about this any worse than if he'd posted a pic of Goatse in the OP.
Dyack makes a thread that asks for people to be 'for' or 'against' the game and frankly, in the larger scale of things, himself. Yet he offers no terms or stipulations for such a wager.
Then when Duckroll responds to the direct criticism of him in OP with a well worded and reasoned reply all Dyack does in return is offer up a 'Put up or shut up' retort. Again with no terms for this supposed wager.
Dyack has done himself no favours. All he has done is prolong the game's (and his own) infamy for longer. So much so this is going to overshadow all the upcoming press this game is going to receive.
If Dyack wanted the game to speak for itself he should have let it do exactly that.
To finish, I wonder what voice Shawn Elliot will use when he reads ou Dyack's OP on GFW Radio next week.