Something I would like to add about Twisted Metal DLC.
David Jaffe mentioned that the most significant thing he learned from working on Calling All Cars was content. I am just paraphrasing, but the interview went along the lines of him saying that he realized that Calling All Cars could have done much better if there was more content in the game.
With taking that lesson into heart, David Jaffe as well as Scott Campbell realized that they needed to stuff this game with as much content as possible. Because they realized that ultimately the consumer wants as much bang for their buck as possible. And when games are running $60 a pop. A game like Heavenly Sword that had a single player campaign that ran at 6-7 hours tops? Compare it to a game like Skyrim where you have hundreds of hours of possible gameplay. Which one do you think will sell better in the grand scheme of things?
The question I would want to ask everyone here is this;
Would you rather have a game like Dragon Age Origins that cost you $60 our the gate. Then adds another $60 of content down the line as DLC?
Or would you rather have that $60 worth of DLC already in the game when it ships?
People want to get upset because Twisted Metal has no planned DLC, yet you don't consider the content it already posses for $60.
You all know damn well Developers/Publishers are very capable (and surely already have) cut content from a game that was already/almost finished and then added later as DLC.
We really have no idea how much content and replay value this game has until we play it. So let's calm down and see what the word of mouth says before we jump the gun.
Here is another goofy suggestion for the OT.
Twisted Metal |OT| Metal Up Your Ass!
Got the idea from this....
