Sectorseven
Member
How do they operate without filling those jobs? Eventually something has to give, right?
When I worked as a temp in healthcare 3 years ago:
I was hired in a group of 5. After a matter of a few weeks, I was the only one left.
I saw another group of 4 get hired. They all dropped out quickly after training.
I saw another group of 15 get hired. They either dropped out or were let go for not being good enough. It was a position that required high quality control after all. Only one was left over.
I quit after a year for a better opportunity because I was one of the best temps and even received a "high recommendation" for a permanent job posting, but since I was an external employee I was completely blocked from the opportunity. I was just as qualified (if not more so) than even the internal applicants. I honestly hate how temp agencies work and I hate how I was receiving less money than I should've been with zero benefits to boot, even though I had exemplary performance.
It's like, they'd rather go through the effort of training and paying a bunch of potential flakes than trying to bring in a few good people and offer them proper compensation for good work and loyalty. It just creates a cycle of turnover.
How do they operate without filling those jobs? Eventually something has to give, right?
A big problem is "key word" hiring. Companies don't use paper resumes anymore, they use internet forms. A huge chunk of potential employees are weeded out by algorithms and assistants before they even come to a set of human eyes in HR. Unless you use certain key words and key phrases your resume simply will not even get viewed. Human Resources isn't "human" anymore. You have to play some kind of stupid "beat the system" game these days before you even become a consideration.
Companies ask for too much experience and degrees. But on the other hand, because they can't expect people to stick around for a decade or more, it is also very costly to train them and then see them jump ship because they now have the experience. Hard problem to fix.
Companies used to train people to do things. Now they expect incoming employees to know how to use very specific systems as a prerequisite. It always kinda pissed me off. I graduated summa cum laude from a top 20 University. I can figure it out.
Well that's what happens when every entry level job demands years of experience. You can't get the job without experience and you can't get the experience without a damn job.
How about you pay people more you cheapskates. And pay more taxes while you're at it.
How do they operate without filling those jobs? Eventually something has to give, right?
How do they operate without filling those jobs? Eventually something has to give, right?
Not that hard.
If you have an employee you want to train, reward him for completion with a raise and charge him for the training. Don't actually make him pay these costs unless he leaves the company and after a set period of time (when the employer has made the money back on the training) this is payed off.
The employee wanting to leave for a new job with his new training will now ask his new employer looking to headhunt him to take over these costs of leaving, thus sharing the costs of this training between employers.
Beyond that, make sure people enjoy the working conditions, and feel loyal to their employer. Which again comes from paying them what they deserve, give them a raise when they are worth it not only when they ask for it.
How do they operate without filling those jobs? Eventually something has to give, right?
So your proposed fix is to slap an employee leaving a company with a "training fee?" How would this be quantified? Would you be ok if you quit your current job, and you were charged $3,000 for "training?"
How do they operate without filling those jobs? Eventually something has to give, right?
It's always been this way though. What people don't realize is that often you can just apply anyway and get the job. It might even help you, because while everyone else is passing up the job due to not having the qualifications, you can slide right in without having to compete against too many candidates
Well that's what happens when every entry level job demands years of experience. You can't get the job without experience and you can't get the experience without a damn job.
I remember seeing a job posting that required 10 years of web development experience, and a total of 15 years experience in software development.
This was 2001.
I remember seeing a job posting that required 10 years of web development experience, and a total of 15 years experience in software development.
This was 2001.
I remember seeing a job posting that required 10 years of web development experience, and a total of 15 years experience in software development.
This was 2001.
I could see if they just said they wanted 10-15 years of software development experience, but expecting 10 years in web development experience when the web hadn't been around that long was amusing.
This. So very THIS.
So many companies, have so many different systems, so saying something like ABC Inventory System Experience is required, when there could be 100 different systems in use...so infuriating. Like, I've told people on interviews, "I taught myself to code because I was bored, I can figure out how to enter and extract info from your system".
Or just super specific requirements that literally would require them poaching 1 of about 100 people from another company in North America to fill, versus looking for any glimmer of potential in a person.
Canadian, but the exact job interview that made me give up on my hometown entirely was for a junior IT helpdesk position. The only requirements listed were some networking stuff and A+ level proficiency.
They wanted someone with programming and database administrator experience. For $12/hour. I had to do a timed test and was very, very confused by what they gave me since it didn't match the job posting in any way.
LOL i bolded the best part. I also taught myself to program and have moved on to data science, including machine learning. I've spent 2 years of my free time on this.
Someone on an interview a few weeks back was questioning my tableau skills. fuck you man. give me some fucking credit. If I can deploy a neural network I can fucking make you a presentation in tableau.
its insanely frustrating.
give a little more and expect a little less
Companies used to train people to do things. Now they expect incoming employees to know how to use very specific systems as a prerequisite. It always kinda pissed me off. I graduated summa cum laude from a top 20 University. I can figure it out.
Well that's what happens when every entry level job demands years of experience. You can't get the job without experience and you can't get the experience without a damn job.
I remember seeing a job posting that required 10 years of web development experience, and a total of 15 years experience in software development.
This was 2001.
I could see if they had said they wanted 10-15 years of software development experience, but expecting 10 years in web development experience when the web hadn't been around that long was amusing.
Employers: "no"Pay. Better. Wages.
It's really not hard to answer this dilemma.
Nintendo uses lots and lots of contract workers at under market wage with no benefits. Basically, they keep getting more people based on name recognition alone.
Had a recruiter contact me about a job recently, (QA Manager).
The job description was basically a 1-man QA department. The first few were fine for a QA Manager, then you have to become QA Engineer, QA Analyst, QA Lead, QA Tester...all rolled into one for a single pitiful salary
- Implement QA processes and procedures for company
- Create estimates and schedules for all initiatives
- Create and disseminate project reports
- Foster an environment of continuous improvement
- Research, Implement and execute on automation solutions
- Create and maintain test plans and cases
- Maintain bug databse
- Lead testing efforts
- Execute test cases
- etc, etc
These are different skill sets based on different experience and career paths. Fuck that noise.
A big problem is "key word" hiring. Companies don't use paper resumes anymore, they use internet forms. A huge chunk of potential employees are weeded out by algorithms and assistants before they even come to a set of human eyes in HR. Unless you use certain key words and key phrases your resume simply will not even get viewed. Human Resources isn't "human" anymore. You have to play some kind of stupid "beat the system" game these days before you even become a consideration.
I also notice that companies don't really want to invest in people. Employees are disposable and that same mentality is seen in recruitment.
If you don't meet the minimum experience requirements, apply anyways. I've interviewed at a few places where that is very flexible. And you can fudge those numbers a bit yourself if you've ever worked part time, done internships or did military service. For my current gig I flipped my 4 years in the Army in a finance unit as office and business-related experience.
Yep, I've seen this consolidation a lot recently with Business Analysts and Project Managers creating some sort of hybrid role where they want you responsible for both. I don't want to work 80 hours a week and get paid for 40, but thanks.
If anything this is hard proof that people are not being held back because the requirements are too high, but rather because they're paying attention to the requirements in the first place
Either they had HR write that job posting in the image, or they're trying to abuse the H-1B visa system.
Had a recruiter contact me about a job recently, (QA Manager).
The job description was basically a 1-man QA department. The first few were fine for a QA Manager, then you have to become QA Engineer, QA Analyst, QA Lead, QA Tester...all rolled into one for a single pitiful salary
- Implement QA processes and procedures for company
- Create estimates and schedules for all initiatives
- Create and disseminate project reports
- Foster an environment of continuous improvement
- Research, Implement and execute on automation solutions
- Create and maintain test plans and cases
- Maintain bug databse
- Lead testing efforts
- Execute test cases
- etc, etc
These are different skill sets based on different levels of experience and career paths. Fuck that noise.
Absolutely disgustingI listened to this on NPR yesterday. Corporations love the power of fear on employees they gained from the recession and hadn't let go even when the country was back on its feet.
This is a reciprocal relationship, though. Companies can only take the risk in investing in your training if they can expect you to stay around. However, once you have been trained, you can get a higher salary at another company that did not waste money on training, so you'll probably move. So companies don't take the risk in investing in you.
Company training relied on the cultural glue and social norms of company loyalty. It's not clear to me how we overcome that problem now we live in such an atomised society.