OriginalThinking
Member
For some reason it tickles me that Americans refer to Petroleum as gas, when clearly at the time of purchase it's a liquid. Anyway...........
It's short for gasoline.For some reason it tickles me that Americans refer to Petroleum as gas, when clearly at the time of purchase it's a liquid. Anyway...........
For some reason it tickles me that Americans refer to Petroleum as gas, when clearly at the time of purchase it's a liquid. Anyway...........
For some reason it tickles me that Americans refer to Petroleum as gas, when clearly at the time of purchase it's a liquid. Anyway...........
Gas is short for gasoline.
Apparently it was called gasoline (or gasolene) before it was used as a motor fuel, and Petrol was already trademarked in the US.
I was young but I even remember this. Hell I remember just a few years ago, gas prices were around 3.00 and fell all the way down to 1.04..I loved it.
Edit: Here in the South we have a grocery chain WINN-DIXIE and they have a reward card where if you spend a certain amount, you get 5% off your fuel. Or if you buy certain products you automatically get anywhere between 5-15%. I know some people who wait and rack up the percentage so the next time they get gas, it's pretty much free.
Instead of buying a $80K EV why not a $35K EV and a $35K gas car?So tired of the gas price roller coaster. I want to make the jump to electric (Tesla Model S) if it's feasible for me in a year or so.
It would be nice if I could do some kind of 1 month test with an electric car to see if it truly fits my needs, lifestyle, etc. If I want to take a road trip to SF I'd like to be able to do it in my car and not a rental. Can I do it in an electric? How much will charging delay my drive time? Can I take PCH or do I have to stick to the 5? How about driving to Mammoth or even Phoenix? I'd like to really find out what the realities are before making the commitment. Tesla should do some kind of trial program in the form of a 1 or 2 month rental before committing to buy.
Higher prices also hurts people who have jobs delivering things and need to pay for gas to do so. That's something society is growing increasingly reliant on. I don't fucking care about the environment when gas prices are making it difficult to live as it is *right now*. Besides, there is no such thing as unscrupulous consumption. If someone paid for their car they should be able to drive it as much as they want without worrying about it too much.
The government shouldn't have to make up the difference, the oil companies should just eat the loss.If current gas is, let's say, $3.00 / gallon, and you want it to be $0.99 / gallon, but expect the government to some how make up the difference (so, let's just say $2.00 for the ease of calculation) per gallon, and the U.S. consumes ~134 billion gallons annually... yep, the U.S. government would have to pay out about $268,000,000,000 annually to subsidize that difference in price. The annual U.S. budget is around $2.3 trillion, if my memory serves (maybe as high as $3 trillion).
As I was typing this, I was going to argue that you're insane, but looking at the figures, we could slash the U.S. military budget by $270 billion from its current ~$700 billion to drop the price of every gallon of gas in the U.S. by $2.00 while still spending more on our military than any country in the world by a long shot.
Damn.
Also, I'm in a hurry, so if my math sucks I apologize in advance.
Seriously. They have us well conditioned to think that $3.20 is cheap.
Just paid $2.86 a gallon and it still cost $70 to fill up.
Damn, was about to say I had it pretty good at $2.98 the other day in St. Charles
Not really a loss, just less profit.The government shouldn't have to make up the difference, the oil companies should just eat the loss.
Instead of buying a $80K EV why not a $35K EV and a $35K gas car?
The government shouldn't have to make up the difference, the oil companies should just eat the loss.
Then they go bankrupt and you get no gas at all. Dude, grow up.
This attitude of "I deserve to get cheap gasoline." is beyond ridiculous. Why not just ask for the ability to fly and free blow-jobs?
It is difficult and expensive to find, extract, ship, refine, and distribute gasoline. Anyone who thinks they can do a better job can raise capital and jump into the game. But the USA has been drilling up the country for 150+ years now and it is harder and harder to find oil. Combine that with the fact that China has finally woken up from Mao-induced slumber and is buying up more & more oil on international markets and you get the cold hard fact that gasoline prices have gone up and they will continue going up.
So get used to it and try to figure out ways to avoid using oil or using it more efficiently. Whining is not going to help at all and nor will demanding the government do something they simply cannot do.
Without going off topic I would rather have one car (I've had two and it kinda sucks) and the S best fits what I want in terms of balancing looks/practicality/performance.
The Volt is probably a better fit for me in terms of flexibility but it's so... ugly... and not very fun.
Without going off topic I would rather have one car (I've had two and it kinda sucks) and the S best fits what I want in terms of balancing looks/practicality/performance.
The Volt is probably a better fit for me in terms of flexibility but it's so... ugly... and not very fun.
Undoubtedly they do make a lot of money. They are a big powerful industry. But part of that is our own damn fault. We let ourselves become completely dependent upon them.spec, let's not be obtuse here. While I don't think oil companies have any obligation to operate at cost or anything ridiculous like that, they continually post record profits quarter after quarter, and their CEO's rake in so much cash that they're pretty much continually throwing hundreds of millions into political races to get Republicans elected.
The "I deserve cheap ________________" is prevalent in just about everything now. TV's should be cheap... CE profits be damned. Game consoles be cheap, hardware producers be damned. Clothing should be cheap, ethics and working conditions of people producing said clothes be damned.
Not an option for many as living expenses can be much higher in areas close to people's jobs.-Live closer to work
Not an option for most people when they're so expensive.-Buy a much more efficient car
You're joking right? A lot of people live way too far from their jobs for this. If you work in the city, good luck affording both gas and your rent. Hell, good luck just affording your rent.-Bicycle (or an electric bike)
This is an option for more people but still doesn't cover everyone I'm afraid, and doesn't cover people who deliver things for a living and have to pay for their own gas.-Use public transportation
See above about the more efficient car.-Buy an Electric car
If you choose not to do these things then you really don't have anyone to blame but yourself.
it costs me $8.2005 for a US gallon of fuel in my country
stop complaining.
Many places would outright refuse to hire me based on that fact.
it costs me $8.2005 for a US gallon of fuel in my country
stop complaining.
You likely have a useful and functional system of public transportation in your country, and if not, can easily go to your place of work/study/leisure/etc with a short walk. Our sprawled out, suburban nation, does not have those things.
Stop complaining.
We paid for our low gas prices in the form of the taxes our country spent waging wars in the Middle East.
Not that I condone the wars, just saying.
Someone hasn't tried to ride the london tube on the weekend. and thats the best we have got.
Ok then.
we pay way more tax too. On EVERYTHING.
Your tax money probably goes to things like universal healthcare, though.
Not an option for many as living expenses can be much higher in areas close to people's jobs.
Not an option for most people when they're so expensive.
You're joking right? A lot of people live way too far from their jobs for this. If you work in the city, good luck affording both gas and your rent. Hell, good luck just affording your rent.
This is an option for more people but still doesn't cover everyone I'm afraid, and doesn't cover people who deliver things for a living and have to pay for their own gas.
See above about the more efficient car.
You seem detached from reality if you believe this. I don't even have a car anymore because of how much gas costs, and probably never will again. That's a problem in a country that just assumes you have one. Many places would outright refuse to hire me based on that fact. Not to mention not having a car means having much less freedom and satisfaction from life in general.
Cant argue with that. never the less, in terms of gas prices, The US has it way better than anywhere else. Lets not pretend you guys don't have massive urban areas with great public transport or that Europe doesn't have some extremely remote areas where public transport doesn't exist.
Most of the options assume you are probably making quite a bit of money, except the public transportation one. But even that will become unbearably expensive is gas prices aren't controlled.Those are all real options and you best learn to start to deal with reality because the situation is only going to get worse.
Then alternatives need to pop up for transportation beyond what we have now because the situation just isn't good. Either that or the oil companies should be forced to suffer a bit too. They don't need to make record profits every year.I think it is admirable that you don't have a car but you seem bitter that you were forced into it. Well, that is probably going to be the future for more and more people.
Aside from New York and LA, which take up a fraction of a % of the combined land mass of the United States that is inhabited, please enlighten me as to where these massive urban areas with great public transport are. Clearly living in the Miami-Ft. Lauderdale metropolitan area isn't massive or urban enough to justify having a great public transportation system.
When are we getting proper electric cars so we can end this crap?
Aside from New York and LA, which take up a fraction of a % of the combined land mass of the United States that is inhabited, please enlighten me as to where these massive urban areas with great public transport are. Clearly living in the Miami-Ft. Lauderdale metropolitan area isn't massive or urban enough to justify having a great public transportation system.
That's because they do. The government subsidises gasoline in Venezuela. It's a terrible policy that results in additional waste and pollution.I hope it stays like that until I get back in the country. I am down in Venezuela for work and was surprised to learn that they practically give gas out down here.
The answer is 'north of the Mason-Dixon line'. The South is known for having shitty public transit, most major cities not in Texas or Florida have at least decent public transit. Boston, Chicago, and DC are the ones I have personally experienced and they're all phenomenal. I've never been to SF but my friend out there sold his car shortly after moving there so I guess they're probably fine.
Land mass? What does that matter? Population does. 18 million people, or 1 in 16 Americans, live in the NY Metro Area alone.
Yup.That is what I mean, 2 dollars kept a lot of hood cars running back in the day.