They in their feelings about bro giving that Japanese girl the business in ways she's never had
In how many ways can you be racist.They in their feelings about bro giving that Japanese girl the business in ways she's never had
Who am I racist against exactlyIn how many ways can you be racist.
This is the truth. I highly doubt that the AC series was doing gangbusters in Japan.Their reaction is of course justified, but Japan is largely an irrelevant market at this point for many games. Yeah they’ll probably lose out on 10’s of 1000’s of sales, but I don’t think that’s a big deal for them.
I think it is one of the most interesting protagonist choices for the setting thoughThe most organic, natrual, and totally-not-forced-at-all protagonist choice for the setting.
Interesting why? Because he's simply an African "samurai" in feudal Japan? Is that the only reason its such an interesting choice?I think it is one of the most interesting protagonist choices for the setting though
Just read about this "controversy" and Japanese gamers seem to be confused about this being a fictional work loosely based on historical characters.
This is more tribalism/nationalism and needing to be a special class. I can understand if Ubisoft was depicting the Japanese as some murdering Nazis or something, but this is just a bunch of complaining about to it some historical inaccuracies in a work that is clearly meant to be fictional. Some people just need to grow thicker skin.
Just read about this "controversy" and Japanese gamers seem to be confused about this being a fictional work loosely based on historical characters.
This is more tribalism/nationalism and needing to be a special class. I can understand if Ubisoft was depicting the Japanese as some murdering Nazis or something, but this is just a bunch of complaining about to it some historical inaccuracies in a work that is clearly meant to be fictional. Some people just need to grow thicker skin.
I'm not sure what the insinuation is here.Interesting why? Because he's simply an African "samurai" in feudal Japan? Is that the only reason its such an "interesting" choice?
I suspect that's very likely the same sort of "interesting" that compelled Ubisoft to go with him in the first place.
Please elaborate on what - other than the race of the protagonist within in the context of the setting - makes him "one of the most interesting protagonist choices for the setting"?
News Flash: Most of the world's populations are homogenous and don't appreciate it whenNot surprising. I've seen videos in Japan of them being pretty racist against black people visiting so seeing one of the main protagonists being a black man probably really grinds their gears. Good.
News Flash: Most of the world's populations are homogenous and don't appreciate it whenxenosforeigners try to represent them, and crudely bastardize that representation to boot.
Remember - its not the fact that someone made a piece of entertainment about a black samurai that makes it woke.
What makes it woke is that these decisions are not coming from genuine, organic ideas anymore - but rather deliberate, preconceived agendas with a ton of corporate support behind them, and we have a slew of other examples across entertainment over the last 10 years that prove this to be true.
If there was a game made about a black samurai in 2004, nobody would bat an eye, because the machine pushing all of this stuff didn't exist in 2004 - and the idea for the game likely would have organically come from some small group of developer dudes trying something "different and cool" - but in 2024, we know that's not what's actually going on.
Nobody said anything about Halle Berry being cast as Catwoman in 2004 - Halle Berry was simply hot as fuck and fit the role well. "Woke" didn't exist. "Wokeness" was not even a thing that ever crossed anyone's mind - because why would it?
News Flash: Most of the world's populations are homogenous and don't appreciate it whenxenosforeigners try to represent them, and crudely bastardize that representation to boot.
Yes, for many people she absolutely doesn't count.Apparently the female, Japanese protagonist doesn’t count for representation because reasons.
Even though we’ve seen from past AC games like Odyssey that Ubisoft has a history of doing great justice to their female protagonists.
I'd like to see Ubisoft make an AC game in Africa then have an eastern Asian as main character killing all these bad African NPCs , DEI FTW!!!!!
Yes, for many people she absolutely doesn't count.
If anything, having her there as Yasuke's sidekick is even a more barbed insult.
Not to mention neither her presented appearance nor her behavior is anywhere near of the women of that time period.
I suppose you are playing dumb but anyway, the issue isn't historical accuracy it's black representation.Did I miss something ?
'Complete mockery of history' its AC? In the first game there were clones, aliens and such and such. Second game had flying machines dropping bombs...
Ac has never been accurate. Why is now an issue?
So…just to be clearMore like social media definitely wasn’t this prevalent back in 2004, and we didn’t have this army of grifters and YouTubers screeching to you to be outraged 24/7. But they have willing ears in the gullible.
Tarzan is an AC game?You mean like Tarzan?
I'd like to see Ubisoft make an AC game in Africa then have an eastern Asian as main character killing all these bad African NPCs , DEI FTW!!!!!
Yes, let's paint an entire culture with a broad paint brush. It's not like Ubisoft is known for making excellent titles like Star Wars: Outlaws and the AAAA game Skull and Bones. But yes, they are gonna get it so right with AC: Shadows. Especially with Sweet Baby at the helm. But hey, this may be their breakthrough title after their failure that is Dustborn/Concord, RIGHT?Just read about this "controversy" and Japanese gamers seem to be confused about this being a fictional work loosely based on historical characters.
This is more tribalism/nationalism and needing to be a special class. I can understand if Ubisoft was depicting the Japanese as some murdering Nazis or something, but this is just a bunch of complaining about to it some historical inaccuracies in a work that is clearly meant to be fictional. Some people just need to grow thicker skin.
Have you realised that is the first time that we HAVE to play as a "real" historical person?I think it is one of the most interesting protagonist choices for the setting though
The game is set in Feudal Japan, that culture is so separated from modern Japan it would be silly for people to look at that as foreigners shitting on their past. This kind of thinking is the same as those who cry cultural appropriation when someone sees people copy bits of culture like we have done for all of our existence.News Flash: Most of the world's populations are homogenous and don't appreciate it whenxenosforeigners try to represent them, and crudely bastardize that representation to boot.