I find the idea of a government being able to revoke citizenship incredibly disturbing.
If these people have broken laws, by all means prosecute them.
We're talking about people who are actively trying to destroy the country, not common criminals.
I find the idea of a government being able to revoke citizenship incredibly disturbing.
If these people have broken laws, by all means prosecute them.
You can always relinquish citizenship if you have another.Agreed. This is concerning if it means people who are British by birth and as a child thier parents process them with a passport from thier ancestral home, which they have no control over undermines thier rights, and the general concept of dual nationals status being different to British only. They, at anytime can have thier status removed and are on constant watch for good behavior.
If it applys to British citizenship as a second passport then I wouldn't have any issue.
If British is their second nationality, sure remove it (Those are the risks when you claim it). However if they are British from birth, then I believe it is Britain's duty to deal with them, and I doubt any other country would accept it.
What does this have to do with Brexit?
Germany has been doing this for some time now
I find the idea of a government being able to revoke citizenship incredibly disturbing.
If these people have broken laws, by all means prosecute them.
We're talking about people who are actively trying to destroy the country, not common criminals.
Any examples of Dutch people being deported that were born here? Can't find any examples.Sounds like using ISIS to erode citizen rights.
The Netherlands also really loves not dealing with their own criminals and deporting people instead. Dual citizenship should in no way allow for this.
When my friend gets to keep his and live here but I lose mine for the same crime then that is discrimination plain and clear. I at that point am a 2nd class citizen afraid of being deported, even if I'm a native born citizen.
What does this have to do with Brexit?
Germany has been doing this for some time now
Are traitors immune from being tried, convicted and locked up?
If you're not born in the UK, you don't have UK nationality. If you go through ILR and then claim nationality, you pledge an allegiance that you'll promise to respect the rights, freedoms and laws of the UK.
If you break that allegiance, you stand to face the possibility of having that nationality revoked.
I can see a few that may be against it, but it's something that will be popular and serve as a deterrent to those thinking of acting in a criminal way.
No one is talking about citizens born in the UK in this scenario.
They are all dual nationals, including British-born people with parents of different nationalities, because ministers cannot take away citizenship if it would leave a suspect stateless.
Even if they get life terms there's the possibility of them radicalising others in prison who aren't serving life terms.No, but unless they get life terms they'll just go on to radicalize others and get released to try and carry out further attacks.
I don't know about examples of native born people, yet at least. There is no doubt it will be a point of discussion when the moment is there in the future.Any examples of Dutch people being deported that were born here? Can't find any examples.
If you are a citizen of two countries, and you actively go to war against one of those countries, well, you can stay away.
Huh, no?
I have little sympathy for that. Apparently they don't know what to do here also, considering they have multiple sentences for what I take are serious crimes. People don't get deported for shoplifting once or twice. But really, I can't find anything about cases where this has been done. I remember cases of people being deported because their parents asylum was rejected, and then the kids need to go also, even if they have been here for years. But that is different.I don't know about examples of native born people, yet at least. There is no doubt it will be a point of discussion when the moment is there in the future.
There were however, examples on Dutch tv about people who got here young and got deported after multiple sentences. People who end up not knowing what the hell to do there because they are used to life here.
These are not terrorists and it's important to know that while the argument from politicians now involves terrorists, it will end up affecting others too.
It's just easy to get people to agree to everything as long as you act like it'll 'stop terrorism'.
These are people who failed in the Netherlands. It is our society that failed to fix the problem. Not the country of which he also has a citizenship of.I have little sympathy for that. Apparently they don't know what to do here also, considering they have multiple sentences for what I take are serious crimes. People don't get deported for shoplifting once or twice.
And for the topic at hand. If they go out and join a terrorist organisation, they made their choice to reject their citizenship of this country.
Your link does not say that. That is about war crimes and terrorism: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderw...ekken-nederlandse-nationaliteit-door-overheidThese are people who failed in the Netherlands. It is our society that failed to fix the problem. Not the country of which he also has a citizenship of.
And look at my edit: It is possible for me to lose my citizenship even though I was born here.
So if we both do the same crime you can stay and I will end up in Morocco where I don't understand anything. That's not fair and not according to the values of our law system IMO.
Couldn't you just lose the Morocco citizenship if you really wanted to?These are people who failed in the Netherlands. It is our society that failed to fix the problem. Not the country of which he also has a citizenship of.
And look at my edit: It is possible for me to lose my citizenship even though I was born here.
So if we both do the same crime you can stay and I will end up in Morocco where I don't understand anything. That's not fair and not according to the values of our law system IMO.
Unabhängig von einer Einbürgerung, also auch für gebürtige Deutsche, gelten § 17 Abs. 1 Nr. 5, § 28 StAG: Danach verliert ein Doppelstaater seine deutsche Staatsangehörigkeit, wenn er frei- willig und ohne Zustimmung des Verteidigungsministeriums in die Streitkräfte oder einen ver- gleichbaren bewaffneten Verband eines ausländischen Staates, dessen Staatsangehörigkeit er be- sitzt, eintritt. Zwar wird vereinzelt vertreten, die Norm sei auch beim Anschluss an nichtstaatliche Kampfverbände anwendbar. Überzeugender erscheint jedoch die Beschränkung der Vorschrift auf staatliche Verbände. Die direkte Anwendung setzt voraus, dass es sich um Streitkräfte oder Verbände handelt, die einem Staat zuzurechnen sind. Auch die analoge Anwendung der Norm dürfte ausscheiden: Der Verlust der Staatsangehörigkeit soll nämlich ausweislich der Gesetzesbegründung ein Verhalten sanktionieren, das sich als Abwendung von der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und zugleich als Hinwendung zu dem anderen Heimatstaat des Doppelstaaters darstellt.8 Demnach ist § 28 StAG nicht anwendbar auf Kämpfer des sogenannten Islamischen Staates, da dieser weder selbst Staatsqualität besitzt, noch einem Staat zugerechnet werden kann.
Right which is my point. It is now legally possible. Event though some of it is constitutionally questionable. In the previous election many mainstream parties showed the desire to go even further. This concerns me greatly.Your link does not say that. That is about war crimes and terrorism: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderw...ekken-nederlandse-nationaliteit-door-overheid
No I can not because it is a permanent citizenship. I can tear up my papers and show up in Morocco and they'll still recognize me as a citizen.Couldn't you just lose the Morocco citizenship if you really wanted to?
But you said:Right which is my point. It is now legally possible. Event though some of it is constitutionally questionable. In the previous elections many mainstream parties showed the desire to go even further. This concerns me greatly.
Especially because those deciding things will never ever experience it, no matter how much they wrongdoing they do to the country or it's people. They can rape a whole school or bomb parliament and they'll stay Dutch. It is obvious that I have less rights because of this.
That is not true then. Only with war crimes and terrorism can your nationality be taken away.There were however, examples on Dutch tv about people who got here young and got deported after multiple sentences
Dual nationals who fight for extremist groups can also be stripped of their citizenship.
nvm didn't know it was impossible. Sorry I was misinformed.It is possible for me to lose my citizenship even though I was born here.
So if we both do the same crime you can stay and I will end up in Morocco where I don't understand anything. That's not fair and not according to the values of our law system IMO.
Some countries unfortunately do not allow that, including Morocco, Turkey, Iran and Greece for example.Then make the effort to drop Moroccan citizenship? You have more rights than someone with just citizenship of the Netherlands too if you want to talk about fair.
Can you have the right to stay and not be a citizen? I'm not sure if that was the construction the man was in then but it was real and on Nieuwsuur irrc.That is not true then. Only with war crimes and terrorism can your nationality be taken away.
And in that case, you are going to war against the country. So that implies you have rejected it and we have no obligation to keep you.
That's insane. Especially with countries disallowing dual nationality.Some countries unfortunately do not allow that, including Morocco, Turkey, Iran and Greece for example.
But in this case, they should then really blame that country for making it impossible.
Right which is my point. It is now legally possible. Event though some of it is constitutionally questionable. In the previous election many mainstream parties showed the desire to go even further. This concerns me greatly.
Especially because those deciding things will never ever experience it, no matter how much they wrongdoing they do to the country or it's people. They can rape a whole school or bomb parliament and they'll stay Dutch. It is obvious that I have less rights because of this.
No I can not because it is a permanent citizenship. I can tear up my papers and show up in Morocco and they'll still recognize me as a citizen.
No that is not how rights work. If I'm in Morocco with my Moroccan ID I'm under Moroccan law and the other way around. Besides I also have potential duties that single Dutch nationals don't have.You technically have more rights than someone with just citizenship of the Netherlands too.
Link to that example? Because I am guessing there is a bit more going on there then just a crime and having him deported. Of course if you are not a citizen, but are allowed to stay, that will be taken away from you if you commit a crime.Can you have the right to stay and not be a citizen? I'm not sure if that was the construction the man was in then but it was real and on Nieuwsuur irrc.
And like I said you can start a whole anti-NL coalition of countries and still be Dutch, why can't I? Because of stuff I can't control. But that's beside the point because I believe once you grant someone citizenship then that is irrevocable from the state's side.
Yep, in Holland you need to do away with your other nationality, unless that country doesn't allow it. It's a bit strange. But blame that country. And otherwise, you actually have more rights, since others are not allowed to do this.That's insane. Especially with countries disallowing dual nationality.
I know Turkey doesn't share data to even check for dual nationality.
Blame Morocco, not Holland for that.No that is not how rights work. If I'm in Morocco with my Moroccan ID I'm under Moroccan law and the other way around. Besides I also have potential duties that single Dutch nationals don't have.
Why blame Morocco? It's the Netherlands causing problems here because they don't deem me a real permanent citizen unless international law prohibits them from deporting me.Blame Morocco, not Holland for that.
At least this thread gives context to why Brexit was so popular.
I voted Remain and welcome immigrants and asylum seekers.
If you have ties to ISIS/terrorism that are strong enough to warrant deportation, I don't give a shit about you.
At least this thread gives context to why Brexit was so popular.
Sure you did, mr. revenge porn.
No, Morroco is causing the problem because they don't allow you to reject their citizenship. You are a real citizen, you have the same rights. Unless you want to pick up arms against the state, which is totally reasonable.Why blame Morocco? It's the Netherlands causing problems here because they don't deem me a real permanent citizen unless international law prohibits them from deporting me.
Had to really look for it but here is the link MO Doc: Geboren, getogen. Uitgezet.
Link to that example? Because I am guessing there is a bit more going on there then just a crime and having him deported. Of course if you are not a citizen, but are allowed to stay, that will be taken away from you if you commit a crime.
I don't get why you want to start a "anti-NL coalition" and still be Dutch. You are basically saying here: I want to have the right to become a terrorist against the Dutch state and be allowed Dutch citizenship. That is a really strange argument.
Yep, in Holland you need to do away with your other nationality, unless that country doesn't allow it. It's a bit strange. But blame that country. And otherwise, you actually have more rights, since others are not allowed to do this.
Blame Morocco, not Holland for that.
Why would I lie?
These are people who want to kill indiscriminately and ruin everything our society stands for. Innocent immigrants and asylum seekers are suffering because of them.
NOBODY should give a shit about them.
This is the important part.
What do we do with those who aren't dual nationals?