Audioboxer
Member
I don't like the idea of having different classes of citizenship.
This was a big issue in Canada a while ago.
It's not different classes. It's having citizenship or not having it.
They're essentially committing treason and then returning with the intention to cause harm/violence/further radicalisation. When they're successful "everyone" in the country is saying RIP victims and this is terrible the Government didn't do enough. Now that the Government is doing something proactive and in proportion to these individuals disregard for a country that welcomed them in, it's slippery slope fallacies and acting like this is simply petty/ordinary crime by some.
I really don't get the obsession with it always being the problem of the secondary country to deal with terrorism. It's about time some of these countries where the terrorists are from take responsibility for citizens originally born on their soil and stop refusing to take them back. As many will say we take responsibility when it's our homegrown terrorists, and in this instance we are not making anyone stateless. If you fight in wars against the country you have a citizenship and then you also have the intention to blow up, stab, vehicle ram or commit conspiracy to terrorist acts within the country you deserve the harshest legal penalty possible. With those that have dual citizenship that should be revoking your privelege to say you are a UK citizen. It's the 0.01% of severe dual nationality extremists this will effect. Not citizens who are only UK born.