killer_clank
Member
industrian said:
Pretty good.
industrian said:
They actually had a couple of Tory minority candidates, like the one from Hammersmith among others.industrian said:A Tory MP from a minority? Shit son.
Keyser Soze said:
idahoblue said:Bloody hell Britain.... what have you done?
rhfb said:Are results this damn late a typical Brittish/UK thing? Nationwide results don't take nearly this long in the USA, and local results are normally in 100% by 11PM :lol
So are the ones when I go to vote. Do you mean that they are entirely counted by hand?industrian said:All our votes are paper based.
Okay. I also was expecting more LD seats, I was not aware that the Tories had a lock down earlier. (I'm just a colonialXavien said:Stopped the Tories from being a done deal (like they was 4-5 months ago)?
Sure i would've expected LD to make a breakthrough, but in my view the damage isn't as great as a Tory majority.
So are ours, and they are counted by hand. We normally have results by 10pm of the day for most seats. We have less people in Australia obviously, but also less people counting. Maybe you just need more counters?industrian said:All our votes are paper based.
rhfb said:So are the ones when I go to vote. Do you mean that they are entirely counted by hand?
rhfb said:So are the ones when I go to vote. Do you mean that they are entirely counted by hand?
idahoblue said:Okay. I also was expecting more LD seats, I was not aware that the Tories had a lock down earlier. (I'm just a colonial)
cjelly said:What the fuck happened to the turnout?
People were talking about 75 - even as high as 80% - turnout before 10pm. Here we are sitting at 65% turnout?
I guess the Lib Dem voters thought 'Fuck it, my vote won't make a difference' and all stayed at home.
cjelly said:What the fuck happened to the turnout?
People were talking about 75 - even as high as 80% - turnout before 10pm. Here we are sitting at 65% turnout?
I guess the Lib Dem voters thought 'Fuck it, my vote won't make a difference' and all stayed at home.
cjelly said:What the fuck happened to the turnout?
People were talking about 75 - even as high as 80% - turnout before 10pm. Here we are sitting at 65% turnout?
I guess the Lib Dem voters thought 'Fuck it, my vote won't make a difference' and all stayed at home.
industrian said:The Tories need 68 more seats for a majority.
idahoblue said:Okay. I also was expecting more LD seats, I was not aware that the Tories had a lock down earlier. (I'm just a colonial)
So are ours, and they are counted by hand. We normally have results by 10pm of the day for most seats. We have less people in Australia obviously, but also less people counting. Maybe you just need more counters?
dakster said:Can't believe the people of Salford re-elected that thieving bastard Hazel Blears.
Peter Kellner, YouGov supremo, says at the moment it looks like we're heading for about 310 Tory seats. We're also heading for about 310 Labour and Lib Dem seats combined. With things that close, every seat lost by one party and gained by a rival is very significant.
63?dakster said:Tories need another 54.