UKGAF thread of Politics and Britishness.

Status
Not open for further replies.

scotcheggz

Member
Chinner said:
Debate between George Hargreaves vs Nick Griffin.
http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/christian-party/74148-debate-george-hargreaves-vs-nick-griffin.html

For those who don't know who George Hargreaves, he's the leader of the Christian Party. Gonna watch this now and see how much of a train wreck this is .

Oh my golly, they're both mental. I'm just about to tuck into this, I'll do my best to watch it in its entirety. What a massive car crash.

They are currently just praying, before the debate starts...
 

scotcheggz

Member
Yes indeed!

Nick Griffin just said that the BNP consider Christianity as indigenous? I knew that the BNPs take on indigenous was warped to suit themselves, but wow. They basically just say what they want and twist it to suit what they want to say. I shouldn't really be surprised I suppose.

I would say the pagan religions, before the export of christianity, is just as much deep rooted in out history and culture.. but whatever, I didn't expect to agree with anything in these debates anyway :lol
 

industrian

will gently cradle you as time slowly ticks away.
scotcheggz said:
Yes indeed!

Nick Griffin just said that the BNP consider Christianity as indigenous? I knew that the BNPs take on indigenous was warped to suit themselves, but wow. They basically just say what they want and twist it to suit what they want to say. I shouldn't really be surprised I suppose.

I would say the pagan religions, before the export of christianity, is just as much deep rooted in out history and culture.. but whatever, I didn't expect to agree with anything in these debates anyway :lol

Look at the flags of Scotland and England and tell me what you see.
 

scotcheggz

Member
industrian said:
Look at the flags of Scotland and England and tell me what you see.

Look up idigenous in a dictionary and tell me what you see.

The cross of St. George was brought back to England via the crusades. It's another glaring mistake by the BNP, that they consider reasonably old = Indigenous. It doesn't. The word is pretty specific.
 

scotcheggz

Member
Chinner said:
need more atheists.

I dunno about that. I read Richard Dawkins book "the god delusion" recently and it wasn't pretty. I like the guy and mostly find myself agreeing with him, but seeing such a militant atheist wasn't as pretty as I'd hoped. :lol
 

Enosh

Member
scotcheggz said:
I would say the pagan religions, before the export of christianity, is just as much deep rooted in out history and culture.. but whatever, I didn't expect to agree with anything in these debates anyway :lol
the old pagan religions didn't have half the effect on shaping modern day UK that christianity had

so from that perspective yes, out of all the religions christianity played the most vital role in shaping the culture, history etc etc of the UK
 

scotcheggz

Member
Enosh said:
the old pagan religions didn't have half the effect on shaping modern day UK that christianity had

so from that perspective yes, out of all the religions christianity played the most vital role in shaping the culture, history etc etc of the UK

Oh yeh, i totally agree with that, i was more railing against the use of the word idigenous that the BNP use time and time again, seemingly without any knowledge of what the word stands for. They roll out the old "since the last ice age 10000 years ago" bullshit, but then they skip directly to modern history.

They almost want to believe that Britain was unchanging for the last 10,000 years up until the break up of the empire.
 
Chinner said:
anything good or lolworthy on it?

I think I just threw it straight in the bin >.< It had a picture of the woman and guy (jointly running) standing next to their street sign to show they were local. Hang on, I'll check...

Aye, its in the bin. The missus (Pro-Labour) said they (Labour) wanted to relay the roads, and that was about it. :lol

EDIT:

I googled to find their website:

http://northtynesidelabour.co.uk/index.html

Oh dear :lol :lol
 

Walshicus

Member
Enosh said:
the old pagan religions didn't have half the effect on shaping modern day UK that christianity had

so from that perspective yes, out of all the religions christianity played the most vital role in shaping the culture, history etc etc of the UK
Disagree - even today hundreds of years after the imposition of Christianity there are still strong 'pagan' influences on our culture.
 

Enosh

Member
Sir Fragula said:
Disagree - even today hundreds of years after the imposition of Christianity there are still strong 'pagan' influences on our culture.
examples and comparison of their effect on the UK with historical changes related to christianity like the crusades and englads role in it, church of england etc etc

edit: iam not saying there aren't any influences, i am just saying that the influences from christianity are stronger
 

curls

Wake up Sheeple, your boring insistence that Obama is not a lizardman from Atlantis is wearing on my patience 💤
scotcheggz said:
I dunno about that. I read Richard Dawkins book "the god delusion" recently and it wasn't pretty. I like the guy and mostly find myself agreeing with him, but seeing such a militant atheist wasn't as pretty as I'd hoped. :lol

Maybe he just got fed up of the free ride religion has in todays society, you know critical thinking and all...
 

RedShift

Member
My school is hosting a debate and question session for sixth form students between the four local candidates. There's our Labour MP, and the candidates for the Conservatives, Lib Dems and Labour. Should be interesting, the Conservative candidate could face tough questions; he was placed as head governor of our school by the council and had the Headteacher fired, and we never got a proper explaination. Our MP is pretty much universally loved by everyone.
 
scotcheggz said:
I dunno about that. I read Richard Dawkins book "the god delusion" recently and it wasn't pretty. I like the guy and mostly find myself agreeing with him, but seeing such a militant atheist wasn't as pretty as I'd hoped. :lol

I hate the word "militant" atheist. It suggests to me atheists in military garb waiting to pop some religious heads.

Dawkins isn't really that harsh in God Delusion. He doesn't have to be nice about religion, which is what the problem is these days. It's treated with far too much respect, especially with the controversial issues.
 

Empty

Member
Seems like Labour really got caught off-balance by the business letter thing. I imagine they raised NI because they have to raise taxes and national insurance doesn't have the word tax in it so it sounds less bad to the electorate in headlines, and thinking they wouldn't get much political trouble for it. Yet for the last few days the news has been all about 'BUSINESS BACKS TORIES' and Labour launches "TAX ON JOBS' which hurts their whole Labour 'investment ' and 'securing the recovery' narrative. Though the tories are being disingenuous on the whole issue as the spent the last year lambasting Labour for being wishy washy with figures and not taking the deficit seriously, and are obviously going to raise taxes in other areas, it is clearly a major win for them.
 

scotcheggz

Member
Dabookerman said:
I hate the word "militant" atheist. It suggests to me atheists in military garb waiting to pop some religious heads.

Dawkins isn't really that harsh in God Delusion. He doesn't have to be nice about religion, which is what the problem is these days. It's treated with far too much respect, especially with the controversial issues.

I agreed with him about 95% of the book, what I said earlier was more of a throwaway comment since I didn't want to derail. I liked the book mostly and agreed with his issues with religion as an institution. I found it hard to chew when he attacked regular people who have faith.
 
scotcheggz said:
I agreed with him about 95% of the book, what I said earlier was more of a throwaway comment since I didn't want to derail. I liked the book mostly and agreed with his issues with religion as an institution. I found it hard to chew when he attacked regular people who have faith.

I don't really remember him attacking people with faith though, since he doesn't care if people do. (It's been some time since I've read it, so if you could show me a quote or two where he does, would be helpful)
 

scotcheggz

Member
Dabookerman said:
I don't really remember him attacking people with faith though, since he doesn't care if people do. (It's been some time since I've read it, so if you could show me a quote or two where he does, would be helpful)

Chapter 5 - The roots of religion. This is where the book started to turn sour for me. It's the section of the book where he disects religion to a minute scale. Up until then I was nodding my head in agreement completely as he spoke about the dangers of religious institutions etc. But past chapter 5 in the book, he moves away from the institutions and attacks the very idea of faith. I suppose this is integral for his argument, perhaps I'm just too passive.

I also took issue with his teapot theory, that if someone believed in a teapot orbiting jupiter existed you could scientifically prove that it doesn't exist and he feels the same way about god. He skirts the philosophical issue of existence however, that if said person lives his life in accordance to the teapot and holds faith that it is there, does that teapot not exist?

Like I said though, I did agree with him often and felt it was refreshing to hear someone talk openly the institution. Perhaps I'm just too passive to agree with him 100%. Anyway, this is probably all best for another thread.
 

jas0nuk

Member
Brown will announce the election on Tuesday morning (6th April) at around 11am outside Downing Street. Polling day will be 6th May.

Ya heard it here first.
 
N

NinjaFridge

Unconfirmed Member
People should start worshipping Dawkins as a God just to see what happens. I'd be up for it, if only to piss him off.
 
NinjaFridge said:
People should start worshipping Dawkins as a God just to see what happens. I'd be up for it, if only to piss him off.

South Park made that joke a while ago (it was the episode where Cartman travels thorugh time because he can't wait the Wii to come out) and it DID piss off Dawkins.
 

Veidt

Blasphemer who refuses to accept bagged milk as his personal savior
I haven't been following the elections properly, please tell me Lib Dems or Labour is looking at a better chance of election rather than the Conservatives.

I have hope, Britain will not fail me.
 
Jibril said:
I haven't been following the elections properly, please tell me Lib Dems or Labour is looking at a better chance of election rather than the Conservatives.

I have hope, Britain will not fail me.


Oh we will.... 8 years of Tory rule are forthcoming.
 

Veidt

Blasphemer who refuses to accept bagged milk as his personal savior
Cerebral Assassin said:
Oh we will.... 8 years of Tory rule are forthcoming.
Then Britain has failed me. I wish Chinner ran for office.
 

Sh1ner

Member
I have avoided politics all my life. My current view of politics is that as a country we try and vote in people who won't fuck up the country as the next guy?

Now no matter who wins, they still suck at the end of their term and all we have are false promises that are not fulfilled. I really do feel like we don't have any positive change from one party to the next. Just worse mistakes we have avoided.

So do you lot agree with my opinion or do you believe the party you will vote for will make a real change?
 

Chinner

Banned
Dark Machine said:
South Park made that joke a while ago (it was the episode where Cartman travels thorugh time because he can't wait the Wii to come out) and it DID piss off Dawkins.
Wouldn't say it pissed him off, although he didn't like it. Actually, he seemed more concerned about the British accent rather than the digs at him.
 
Jibril said:
I haven't been following the elections properly, please tell me Lib Dems or Labour is looking at a better chance of election rather than the Conservatives.

I have hope, Britain will not fail me.
Lib Dems? Don't be ridiculous. Barring a complete Labour meltdown, the Liberals aren't going to make much gains. It makes me laugh how we go through this every election, "this election is going to be the Liberal Democrats' moment". I'm amazed at the amount of coverage the Lib Dems get in the general election when it's obvious that they will never gain enough seats to form a government. They don't even contest all the electoral seats! Having said that, any vote that drains Labour's support is fine by me.

---

Anyway, so Labour's new election campaign poster:

14xjots.jpg


What do we think? Personally, I think the Guardian's spoof poster 'step outside posh boy' was probably more effective than Labour's real one.
 
Sh1ner said:
So do you lot agree with my opinion or do you believe the party you will vote for will make a real change?


The last 2 governments have had real impact on our country, so whoever gets in will make a change, but unfortunately the system of Government is flawed & unelected officials have too much stroke.
 

RedShift

Member
blazinglord said:
Lib Dems? Don't be ridiculous. Barring a complete Labour meltdown, the Liberals aren't going to make much gains. It makes me laugh how we go through this every election, "this election is going to be the Liberal Democrats' moment". I'm amazed at the amount of coverage the Lib Dems get in the general election when it's obvious that they will never gain enough seats to form a government. They don't even contest all the electoral seats! Having said that, any vote that drains Labour's support is fine by me.

---

Anyway, so Labour's new election campaign poster:

14xjots.jpg


What do we think? Personally, I think the Guardian's spoof poster 'step outside posh boy' was probably more effective than Labour's real one.

Poorly timed. The Quattro combined with Ashes to Ashes being back this week means this will probably win votes for the conservatives.
 
J Tourettes said:
Why 8 years and not ten?


Because the Tories(once in) are going to start their infighting far quicker than New Labour did (the old coots still think they are the party of Government) so I suspect Cameron will need the mandate from the public(plus parties are more loyal at election time) to keep his party in check.
 

Parl

Member
RedShift said:
Poorly timed. The Quattro combined with Ashes to Ashes being back this week means this will probably win votes for the conservatives.
Kinda what I thought. People are dumb, but not that dumb though.

I love Ashes to Ashes.
 

Chinner

Banned
Jibril said:
I haven't been following the elections properly, please tell me Lib Dems or Labour is looking at a better chance of election rather than the Conservatives.

I have hope, Britain will not fail me.
Currently the polls are: Tory > Labour > Lib Dem, however the lead the Tories have over Labour isn't much, which will result in a hung parliament. Things could quickly change once the election campaigns start though. If we assume we do get a hung parliament then that would give the Lib Dems a very powerful position.

Probably means nothing. Last time we had a hung parliament the party in power just had another vote until they got the majority :lol .

Sh1ner said:
I have avoided politics all my life. My current view of politics is that as a country we try and vote in people who won't fuck up the country as the next guy?

Now no matter who wins, they still suck at the end of their term and all we have are false promises that are not fulfilled. I really do feel like we don't have any positive change from one party to the next. Just worse mistakes we have avoided.

So do you lot agree with my opinion or do you believe the party you will vote for will make a real change?
Depends how you define 'real change'; theres some shit we'd all love but blatantly won't happen shamefully. There has been change though, for example let's talk about What New Labour has done:
• Significantly improved the NHS
• Better equal rights
• Minimun wage
• War in Iraq and Aghanistan

And other shit. Look at what the Tories did in the eighties, allot of shit changed there in a small period of time.

I know what you mean though, and most people share the same opinion which can be seen in the polls.
blazinglord said:
Not quite sure if they thought that through lol.
 

Veidt

Blasphemer who refuses to accept bagged milk as his personal savior
Chinner said:
Currently the polls are: Tory > Labour > Lib Dem, however the lead the Tories have over Labour isn't much, which will result in a hung parliament. Things could quickly change once the election campaigns start though. If we assume we do get a hung parliament then that would give the Lib Dems a very powerful position.

Probably means nothing. Last time we had a hung parliament the party in power just had another vote until they got the majority :lol .

Would be amazing.
Chriswok said:
They've succeeded in 10 minutes what David Cameron has been trying to do for at least the last 6 years - he finally looks 'cool'.
:lol
 

jas0nuk

Member
The Conservatives need a 6 point lead to obtain a majority if you count marginal seats who have defected away from Labour - the kind of people who voted Tory until Blair came along, and have gone back now we have the disastrous Brown.

Labour are now fighting for 2nd place. It is entirely possible that they will sink to their historic low of 27% (achieved under Michael Foot) with the Lib Dems overtaking or matching them.

--

That poster is a monumental cock-up and own goal by Labour. Gene Hunt is one of the most loved characters on British TV, he's cool, un-PC and gets the job done. I guess the politically correct berks in Labour think he's nasty and thought this poster would be a huge success. Shows how out of touch they are.

Labour HQ, the gift that keeps on giving! Conservatives have already responded with http://i42.tinypic.com/qn3040.png.

--

There will be a lot of opinion polls this evening before the Sunday papers, as this is the last weekend before the election is called. I'll post them later with some info about what they mean.
 

defel

Member
Who the heck is Gene Hunt? How many people remember the 80s? The poster is designed to work with a particular demographic but it doesnt work with me.
 

jas0nuk

Member
Angus Reid poll conducted for Sunday Express
CONSERVATIVES 38
LABOUR 27
LIB DEMS 20
Likely result: Conservative majority of 60

YouGov poll for the Sunday Times
CONSERVATIVES 39
LABOUR 29
LIB DEMS 20
Likely result: Conservative majority of 56

I'll update this post later, if any more come out. Results are calculated using the Andy Cooke marginals/swingback calculator.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom