Oh, so it must just be that people really want to smoke in pubs, carry guns, ban political correctness, allow workplace discrimination, and unregulate paid holidays, sick pay and maternity leave then. I mean, if it was about Europe, surely you could vote either Tory or Green both of whom promise a referendum and have never had (well, not recently had with the case of the Tories) the above policies?
No, no, you're quite right, all 4,376,635 people that voted UKIP at the 2014 European elections are all undoubtedly racists. How ignorant to think otherwise, I mean, it's just so
simple.
On Europe, proposing a referendum isn't the same as promising an outright withdrawal.
Hopefully they continue to grow and gain more mainstream attention as a viable and sensible party to protest vote for or just vote for in general.
Ah, yes, the Greens. The party that doesn't want to send females to prison because they're females.
CJ382: For the vast majority of women in the criminal justice system, solutions in the community are more appropriate. Community sentences must be designed to take account of women’s particular vulnerabilities and domestic and childcare commitments. The restrictions placed on sentencers around breaches of community orders must be made more flexible.
Why would such a progressive and equality focused party argue for a greater entrenchment of gender roles and the unequal treatment of men and women under law?
Also the party that wants a massive cut on all defence spending because if a threat emerged, we could just rebuild the armed forces before they got here.
PD302: On inspection, there is little or no threat of direct invasion of the UK by any nation. Commitment to a large standing army, a navy of large warships around our coastline, squadrons of fighter planes and a cripplingly expensive missile defence system is therefore unnecessary. Any threat of invasion that might arise in the future is so remote that realignment of the UK military and defence preparations would be possible long before any invasion occurred.
A party concerned with overpopulation...
PP103: There is a need to explicitly consider population since, if it is ignored indefinitely, the risk of over-consumption of natural resources will increase, leading to conflict and ultimately a reduction in carrying capacity.
PP104: There are many causes of population growth and some of these must be addressed to avoid overpopulation. Causes may be as basic as a lack of family planning information and contraceptives. Inequality and lack of opportunities can result in people having more children than they would otherwise want. On a wider scale, it has been observed that populations often increase following wars, social strife and environmental disasters.
...but wants to progressively remove all forms of border control. I didn't realise immigration didn't cause population growth.
MG300: We will work to achieve greater equity between the UK and non-Western countries. In step with this, we will progressively reduce UK immigration controls.
and not take either the resources or skills of those wanting to emigrate into the UK into account.
MG205: Migration policies should not discriminate directly on grounds of race, colour, religion, political belief, disability, sex or sexual orientation. Preference should not be given to those with resources or desirable skills.
And this without highlighting their entire anti science stance, including moronic views on nuclear power, GM foods, transport infrastructure.
Viable and sensible aren't really words I'd use to describe them. And from a cursory glance, Caroline Lucas's voting record has been:
Voted moderately against laws to promote equality and human rights.
Voted moderately against higher taxes on plane tickets.
Voted strongly against raising the threshold at which people start to pay income tax.
Voted strongly against measures to reduce tax avoidance.
Not to say they don't have some good policies, of course. I can only hope any popularity gain comes hand in hand with a reduction on some of their more batshit insane aspects.