Yeah, I will defend that. Just because a seat is empty doesn't mean you are entitled to it. If you go with a train, you also can't travel first class when buying a second class ticket just because there are empty seats. This goes for any mode of transportation.someone will defend this. IMO It's pretty shameful how airlines will let upgrade seats sit empty when there are people on-board who would enjoy the nicer seat.
someone will defend this. IMO It's pretty shameful how airlines will let upgrade seats sit empty when there are people on-board who would enjoy the nicer seat.
NoRéN;234101223 said:They probably tried to throw in the "we're getting married" to try and get some free stuff.
someone will defend this. IMO It's pretty shameful how airlines will let upgrade seats sit empty when there are people on-board who would enjoy the nicer seat.
someone will defend this. IMO It's pretty shameful how airlines will let upgrade seats sit empty when there are people on-board who would enjoy the nicer seat.
If someone wants to seat in a higher class, they can pay
Michael Hohl, the groom, said he and his fiancé, Amber Maxwell
It's weird since I thought it was standard practice.
Air France does this regularly, I even got upgraded to business while having an economy tickets. It's a win win situation. The passenger will be happier and more likely to come back and even pay for the premium ticket and the airline might be getting more money without losing anything in the process. Seems like a no brainer to me.
Or just, you know, ask at the counter or on the plane. I've been upgraded for free a few times just by asking, it can happen.
And I'm pretty sure most semi-competent flight attendants wouldn't allow someone to take up an entire row to sleep while people are boarding.
someone will defend this. IMO It's pretty shameful how airlines will let upgrade seats sit empty when there are people on-board who would enjoy the nicer seat.
I remember one time at some Asian airline I was hitting buttons on their check in thing not understanding what the hell I was doing. When I got in the plane I was in business class while my fiends were in economy, so I kept making fun them calling them plebs and what not, thinking the airline just had a random free upgrade spot. Little did I know, when I got home and saw my bank account I was down $500 dollars and eating top ramen for a month.
How...
24hrs no sleep, still drunk and not understanding any of the Japanese on the screen.
Fast asleep across 3 seats while the plane was still boarding?
Fast asleep across 3 seats while the plane was still boarding?
Yeah there's got to be more to this story. I get that it's another gaffe for United in the news, but whether the flight was half empty or not, who the hell goes to their seat to find someone laying across all three of them, fast asleep and NOT say something.
Wake the dude up and tell him you're in the seat. Or if you go up a couple rows and the flight attendant tells you to get out, explain the situation, and have the flight attendant wake the person up.
I am convinced United is embracing this just to encourage people to fly with them so that they too can have their own kicked off United story.
They're like one of those hot dog stands where you pay to have insults thrown at you.
So I can't imagine a situation where flight attendants completely ignore some guy taking up a whole row sleeping and kick off the couple for no reason.
Nope they do not deserve any benefit of innocent until proven guilty. They are guilty until proven innocent. Defending airlines like united really is pretty low.As fucked up as last week's forced removal story was, United still deserves the "Innocent until proven guilty" treatment because I would imagine there's a ton of customers trying to use the incident as an opportunity to try to fuck over United in one way or another.
While I believe the passengers were probably unruly once they were asked to move, I'm also inclined to believe they didn't know that they had moved to Economy Plus seats when they moved in the first place. It's not like those seats are labeled, they're just seats with a little extra leg room. It's not like these two tried to jump into first class or something.
Also, United is terrible about this. Last time I flew with them was about seven or eight years ago for work, and back then they were charging for exit row seats. I paid because I wanted the extra legroom, but the seats were mostly empty. When the plane doors closed, people naturally tried to move into those seats. They were rebuffed by the staff, who told them, "you had the opportunity to pay for those seats when you checked in," which, of course, pissed everyone off, because they never actually said during boarding that those upgrades were avaiable. And they let those seats sit empty for the whole flight, which made no sense to me.
Anyway, the whole experience with United was so terrible, that I haven't flown them since. I almost exclusively fly Alaska now.
My wife let Southwest know that we were getting married and they sent us free t-shirts.
#swag
The contrasting responses got me good. lolThat shit works great. Me and the wife got bumped to business class flying to Orlando from Dublin. Was class
So I can't imagine a situation where flight attendants completely ignore some guy taking up a whole row sleeping and kick off the couple for no reason.
Not buying it.
This I am sure is somewhere in the middle, clearly as reported it doesn't make any sense. Airlines really need to ease back on all the different classes and costs. Actually what is more accurate is stupid people need to stop paying extra for stupid shit. Some of the so called plus and upgrades are just pointless and throwing money away. If you can afford to throw money away go first class.
I bet you money these guys thought they could make use of the recent bad publicity to get themselves a free upgrade.
And I genuinely wonder how "compliant" they where when they were told to return.
I also don't understand the approach that they did something wrong when there are huge gaps and inconsistencies in the storyI don't really understand why you're taking an approach that suggests that a company with multiple recent examples of mistreating its customers is the victim in this situation.
Because United has done things like this multiple times before? and they don't deserve the benefit of the doubt.I also don't understand the approach that they did something wrong when there are huge gaps and inconsistencies in the story