• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

US government to ban citizens from travelling to North Korea.

Aces&Eights

Member
I think the government is saying this for legal purposes. If you want to go there, you can. However, the US is on record saying not to so if you get detained, they can wash their hands of you and say enjoy your stay.
 

StoOgE

First tragedy, then farce.
I'm fine with this.

I met a dumb Aussie in China who had been to North Korea and basically had the interview experience and was talking about how great it was and how the Americans lie about how bad everything is there.
 

StoOgE

First tragedy, then farce.
I think the government is saying this for legal purposes. If you want to go there, you can. However, the US is on record saying not to so if you get detained, they can wash their hands of you and say enjoy your stay.

That's been their position for a while actually. They've long had on the state department website a disclaimer with a note that says "call the Swiss if you get in trouble"
 

Izuna

Banned
Fucking FINALLY

I really don't think this is about safety of US citizens. The government guns down 1000+ of its own citizens every year, 20x more than UK for example, so one tourist getting manhandled to death in ten years can hardly be a concern.

I believe this is more about negotiation leverage, whenever DPRK has US citizens as bargaining chips it makes it hard for USA to go all in with its sanctions and other measures, it becomes a PR problem for them to be tough as it's perceived it's to the detriment of the detained US citizen.

Stop defending the fact that you went to take the same pictures everyone else did.
 
That's been their position for a while actually. They've long had on the state department website a disclaimer with a note that says "call the Swiss if you get in trouble"

Isn't that because we use the Swedes as intermediary since there is no US embassy or consulate in NK.
 
b19db85e8f8df6a2b36ec519f9e1e1ab--dennis-rodman-dallas-mavericks.jpg
Wasn't he planning another visit?
 

Tigress

Member
Huh. ...i might actually support this. Tourists visiting NK directly benefit the elites of NK at the further expense of its citizens lives.

But IF its Trumps idea and i dont know what to think about that

A broken clock is right twice a day but that doesn't mean it is right for the right reasons.
 

Keasar

Member
Oh, you are correct! I haven't looked at the DOJ website in a bit.

But yeah, point stands. The US governments long standing policy is that they won't help you if you get in trouble there.

I only feel slightly offended. I will eat my meatballs with a small scowl tonight.
 

jfkgoblue

Member
I honestly believe that we are going to do some sort of military operation in NK within the next 2-3 years, and this is designed to get as many US citizens out as possible before we do the action. NK is getting more and more belgerant and I believe that US is going to try and take action before they actually have a nuclear warhead that can reach US soil.
 

Chittagong

Gold Member
Fucking FINALLY



Stop defending the fact that you went to take the same pictures everyone else did.

I don't regret going, and I don't need to defend going to anyone. I enjoyed the trip, and would go again. Maybe not right now as the tensions are at their peak, but with a Finnish passport I am pretty safe. No regrets.
 

Nerokis

Member
Been a long time coming. If you went there you are a dumbass.

Considering I would probably go there if I could, I disagree with this. I need to do more research on how much funding foreign (and Western, specifically, just out of curiosity) tourism provides the regime, but I doubt it's the difference between sustaining it and making it fall. And how many times have we sanctioned North Korea, cut off key humanitarian efforts or exports, only to hurt its people while the regime continues merrily along? This isn't to say I disagree with those actions; only that the relationship between the flow of resources and the well-being of North Korea's citizens is complicated.

On the other hand, the tourism provides a tiny, very flawed, yet also unusual glimpse into an important country. It contributes, in a very small way, to whatever connection between North Korea and the rest of the world exists. I think it's fundamentally worthwhile to see places like North Korea for yourself, and unfortunately, I don't know that there's any other way aside from these tourism services.

As for the risk factor that you'll be held hostage... Again, I don't plan to go there any time soon, so I haven't reviewed my facts, but I don't believe it's particularly high. Of coure, it might be a good idea to wait for the geopolitical environment to calm down before you go.
 

Amory

Member
I don't have a problem with this.

Americans get detained and give NK bargaining chips. Disallowing travel there is a sensible move.
 

slit

Member
I was about to post the same thing. Reminds me of my friend from former eastern Germany. He also wasn't allowed to travel freely.

Would it be alright if your home country simply forgot about you then if you go there and they decide to detain you? Or do you feel you have a right to be used as propaganda by the NK gov't?
 

Chittagong

Gold Member
The "tourism funds the evil" argument just shows either how little people do research, or that they really believe that every little counts, and that out of principle it's bad.

In 2015, North Korea exported $2.83B worth of goods. In other words, the world bought stuff and put that much money to the coffers of the government.

In 2016, there were 4000-6000 western tourists in DPRK. Let's round up the trip price to $1,000 and assume the maximum amount of visitors. That's $6M to the coffers of the government annually.

So if the world would buy even just 10% less stuff from DPRK annually, that would be $238M a year, 40x more money away from the regime than stopping tourism altogether.
 

JettDash

Junior Member
I was about to post the same thing. Reminds me of my friend from former eastern Germany. He also wasn't allowed to travel freely.

Is there a reason your comparison has to be laughable dishonest?

The East German government restricted travel by forcefully stopping people from leaving the country and going to the West.

The US government doesn't give a shit if you leave the country. Or go to any country in the world, except for the totalitarian hermit state that the US has technically been at war with since 1950.
 
Sets a bad precedent. It's one thing to warn your citizens, it's another to prohibit them from visiting another country.

Yes, it is one thing and another. And?

The U.S. is spending a lot of time and money because dumb young people who think they're invincible go to North Korea and get arrested for some reason, bullshit or not. N. Korea can detain people for completely fabricated reasons and there's the small issue that their government threatens to nuke the U.S. on a weekly basis.

I mean, how would this ban work? People go to China and cross into NK from there.

Well it says there one of the tour agencies in China said it'll stop taking Americans. Others likely will too as they're not trying to get into shit with the U.S. government.
 

Fox Mulder

Member
Reminds me of that Gaffer who made a thread about recently visiting North Korea and how delightful he found the painfully transparent facade created entirely for propaganda purposes that surrounded him.

Drew on Giant Bomb went too and had stories of how fascinating it was.

It's all propaganda and you can still be snagged up as a spy and tortured.
 

knicks

Member
I don't want to support NK either, but I don't like the idea of the government telling me where I can and can't go once I leave its borders.

This isn't one of those things which will lead the government from prohibiting you from going elsewhere down the line. This is necessary.
 

Emerson

May contain jokes =>
"The government can't tell me where I can and can't go!" is such a weird stance to take on this issue.

No, the government cannot and will not be able to actually prevent you from going anywhere. If you want to go to North Korea so bad, you can go. Find a way.

What the US government doesn't have to do is help you get there, or bail you out once you get captured. And now they're officially saying: "Don't go, and if you do it anyway, that's your problem."
 

Rktk

Member
I don't think one can justify handing money over the NK gov for a cool holiday story, but I also think people should be free to go where they want.
 
If this is true, then it's been a long time coming and we should've done this year's ago.

Yep. Private citizens traveling for no reason other than tourism should have been banned long ago. It's a dangerous and hostile place.

People should be free to go where they want but also you're infringing on other people's pursuit of happiness by potentially incurring significant cost to rescue your dumbass from the crazy nk government.
 

Chmpocalypse

Blizzard
The "tourism funds the evil" argument just shows either how little people do research, or that they really believe that every little counts, and that out of principle it's bad.

In 2015, North Korea exported $2.83B worth of goods. In other words, the world bought stuff and put that much money to the coffers of the government.

In 2016, there were 4000-6000 western tourists in DPRK. Let's round up the trip price to $1,000 and assume the maximum amount of visitors. That's $6M to the coffers of the government annually.

So if the world would buy even just 10% less stuff from DPRK annually, that would be $238M a year, 40x more money away from the regime than stopping tourism altogether.

This is what rationalization looks like, people.
 
Top Bottom