Aces&Eights
Member
I think the government is saying this for legal purposes. If you want to go there, you can. However, the US is on record saying not to so if you get detained, they can wash their hands of you and say enjoy your stay.
I think the government is saying this for legal purposes. If you want to go there, you can. However, the US is on record saying not to so if you get detained, they can wash their hands of you and say enjoy your stay.
I assume it's more a if you wanna go there you are on your own? Or is it an actual ban
That's been their position for a while actually. They've long had on the state department website a disclaimer with a note that says "call the Swiss if you get in trouble"
That's been their position for a while actually. They've long had on the state department website a disclaimer with a note that says "call the Swiss if you get in trouble"
I really don't think this is about safety of US citizens. The government guns down 1000+ of its own citizens every year, 20x more than UK for example, so one tourist getting manhandled to death in ten years can hardly be a concern.
I believe this is more about negotiation leverage, whenever DPRK has US citizens as bargaining chips it makes it hard for USA to go all in with its sanctions and other measures, it becomes a PR problem for them to be tough as it's perceived it's to the detriment of the detained US citizen.
That's been their position for a while actually. They've long had on the state department website a disclaimer with a note that says "call the Swiss if you get in trouble"
That's been their position for a while actually. They've long had on the state department website a disclaimer with a note that says "call the Swiss if you get in trouble"
Ain't it Sweden?
Wasn't he planning another visit?
Huh. ...i might actually support this. Tourists visiting NK directly benefit the elites of NK at the further expense of its citizens lives.
But IF its Trumps idea and i dont know what to think about that
Oh, you are correct! I haven't looked at the DOJ website in a bit.
But yeah, point stands. The US governments long standing policy is that they won't help you if you get in trouble there.
Fucking FINALLY
Stop defending the fact that you went to take the same pictures everyone else did.
Been a long time coming. If you went there you are a dumbass.
Classic USA government hypocrite foreign policy.
Land of the free
I was about to post the same thing. Reminds me of my friend from former eastern Germany. He also wasn't allowed to travel freely.
I was about to post the same thing. Reminds me of my friend from former eastern Germany. He also wasn't allowed to travel freely.
I was about to post the same thing. Reminds me of my friend from former eastern Germany. He also wasn't allowed to travel freely.
Sets a bad precedent. It's one thing to warn your citizens, it's another to prohibit them from visiting another country.
I mean, how would this ban work? People go to China and cross into NK from there.
I mean, how would this ban work? People go to China and cross into NK from there.
Reminds me of that Gaffer who made a thread about recently visiting North Korea and how delightful he found the painfully transparent facade created entirely for propaganda purposes that surrounded him.
I don't want to support NK either, but I don't like the idea of the government telling me where I can and can't go once I leave its borders.
I assume you both are cool with the idea of being held for ransom then?
So wait what happens if you go illegally and the US finds out? Are you then stuck in NK?
If this is true, then it's been a long time coming and we should've done this year's ago.
Which is likely not in our lifetimes. Of course, it might be a good idea to wait for the geopolitical environment to calm down before you go.
The "tourism funds the evil" argument just shows either how little people do research, or that they really believe that every little counts, and that out of principle it's bad.
In 2015, North Korea exported $2.83B worth of goods. In other words, the world bought stuff and put that much money to the coffers of the government.
In 2016, there were 4000-6000 western tourists in DPRK. Let's round up the trip price to $1,000 and assume the maximum amount of visitors. That's $6M to the coffers of the government annually.
So if the world would buy even just 10% less stuff from DPRK annually, that would be $238M a year, 40x more money away from the regime than stopping tourism altogether.