I never once said anything about if I was pro or against. But its amazing how you can read minds! And if you read my post which I made before this - you will find its Russia duty to make sure they get the best deal for their people. If they think hacking and helping Trump helps them then they have to do it. Just like when their were WMDs in Iraq USA HAD to intervene and get involved.
And your right an NPR piece criticising it is exactly the same as a 2 year 20 million dollar investigation - its EXACTLY the same level of holding people to account!!!
So you want 20 million dollar investigations for each of the 81 instances that the US meddled in other countries affairs, is that the end game? The US is spending this money defensively, so in theory you should be asking the countries that the US meddled with to run expensive investigations... Russia isn't paying for the Mueller investigation. Thus, the question is whether or not it is worth it for the US to spend money to defend it's democratic systems. My opinion is yes
Further concerning price, the Mueller investigation is
still under the cost of various Clinton / Reagen era investigations. It will get more expensive. Should we have investigated Iran Contra? How about Lewinski?
Finally, you asked "Has everyone in America forgotten they are the number 1 country for fucking up other countries ???" I answered by pointing out you answered your own question in the first line of your post, by sourcing an American account of these instances. You did not ask why they haven't all had expensive investigations
So why is it such news when another country is doing it! if its well known this should not be news....so you are saying this is because is Trump!!
It's news because Trump is allowing it to happen. He is siding with the people who are accused of wrongdoing over his own intelligence committee, then pretending he misspoke even though he's been saying that shit forever.
If Merkel had said "That's okay, let the US hack my phone" I bet Germany would've made that big news as well
Curious, are you even American? That may explain why you don't think this is such a big deal, but I also have to wonder why you are so invested in stopping the investigation if you aren't
What exactly did they do since there is zero evidence of collusion and the investiagtion has cleared Trum of collusion.
You provably think Obama is a Kenyan ISIS fighter too and 2Pac is well and alive on the moon? Is it so hd of you to bring facts to the table instead of your feelings?
the investigation has not cleared Trump of collusion, where are you getting this info?
Also, there is not "0 evidence of collusion". Collusion is not a crime, so that word isn't helpful here, and we also don't have any evidence yet because there has been no trial, but we do have the information in the indictments and affidivat that tell us some of what the DOJ has and is confident about:
We know they have evidence of the hacks taking place via Dutch intelligence, to the point that they know specifically which people did the hacking (via the cctv footage).
We also know they have enough evidence to make the following assertions:
- At least one member of congress and one reporter requested the stolen information.
- Someone close to the Trump campaign coordinated the release of the leaked material
- A Russian agent was working with Trump since 2015
- Said agent setup channels of communication between Republican leadership and the Kremlin using the NRA
- Multiple US persons, including another congressman, were involved in coordinating with this Russian agent
- Russians had a hand in choosing Trump's secretary of state
- probably some stuff I missed, I haven't followed this too closely
And this is definitely not everything they have, it's what they felt necessary to include to get these first few indictments