In Hollywood, sure.
So then the film that was released wasn't an auteur-driven film.
yeah, the general flavor of the idea makes a superficial sort of sense, but the theory can only support so much weight, really, and often it gets asked to hold way more than it could bear.
They own so much great ip under the vertigo imprint. Get to it.
As far as I understand, Ayer still had his own cut that they tried to find a compromising middle ground for and he takes ownership for the final cut as it being the film he wanted to make, or is your argument that any film that doesn't have 100% of the creative decisions made by the director is not an "auteur" film?
Now how about getting some better auteurs
Yeah. I think this is a great idea to set itself apart from being just another mcu. But freaking Todd Phillips is the first person you go to for kicking this off.......
![]()
Make this movie damnit!!!
![]()
Make this movie damnit!!!
they started to work on that a few times
every time it started back up everyone here rightfully went "what the fuck god no"
Seriously. It's not like anyone had faith in it.Just kill the DCEU.
Seriously. It's not like anyone had faith in it.
I think that any film that gets recut by a trailer house ceases to have earned the right to be called "auteur-driven" in it's final form, yeah.
Editing the film is making the film.
Please no![]()
Make this movie damnit!!!
How about you get some of that in non Wonder Woman blockbusters first, and since when was "complicated writing" a good thing?
I mean. BvS was already "auteur-driven" and well...
Just do better.