• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Variety: Warner Bros. to launch "auteur-driven" DC banner with "unusual story angles"

In Hollywood, sure.

In most films.

Even the super-small ones feature a level of collaboration that kinda wipes out the idea the film has a singular "author," which is fine, because the collaborative nature of film, the knitting together of so many different perspectives focused on the same artistic pursuit, is part of what makes the medium so magical at its best.
 

Cuburt

Member
So then the film that was released wasn't an auteur-driven film.

As far as I understand, Ayer still had his own cut that they tried to find a compromising middle ground for and he takes ownership for the final cut as it being the film he wanted to make, or is your argument that any film that doesn't have 100% of the creative decisions made by the director is not an "auteur" film?
 

Screaming Meat

Unconfirmed Member
yeah, the general flavor of the idea makes a superficial sort of sense, but the theory can only support so much weight, really, and often it gets asked to hold way more than it could bear.

Yeah, can't argue with that. It probably comes from film's earlier aspirations toward being 'art' more than anything.

They own so much great ip under the vertigo imprint. Get to it.

Hellblazer. Paul Bettney.

Maybe Guy *BLORK* Richie...?
 
As far as I understand, Ayer still had his own cut that they tried to find a compromising middle ground for and he takes ownership for the final cut as it being the film he wanted to make, or is your argument that any film that doesn't have 100% of the creative decisions made by the director is not an "auteur" film?

I think that any film that gets recut by a trailer house ceases to have earned the right to be called "auteur-driven" in it's final form, yeah.

Editing the film is making the film.
 

Wag

Member
204819-18356-115245-1-lobo.jpg


Make this movie damnit!!!
 

Mechazawa

Member
I love the implication that they're just purposely shovelling out trash with their cinematic universe stuff because comic movie nerds will consume it just fine.

And given Suicide Squad's performance, they're not even wrong.
 

Wag

Member
they started to work on that a few times

every time it started back up everyone here rightfully went "what the fuck god no"

It could work if they do it right. It would never be violent enough to work.

In any event I'll be surprised if we ever see the Booster Gold movie.
 

Cuburt

Member
I think that any film that gets recut by a trailer house ceases to have earned the right to be called "auteur-driven" in it's final form, yeah.

Editing the film is making the film.

So then why do you think BvS qualifies when the studio steps into force a recut to force a rating change and shorten the film but not when the studio steps into force a recut to change the tone?

David Brenner edited BvS.

Lee Smith edited The Dark Knight.

Some trailer house makes a cut, Ayer approves it, this is different how? Ayer still shaped that film from it's inception.
 

Cooter

Lacks the power of instantaneous movement
This sounds great to me but I wonder how they'll handle it in relation to the DCEU? You can have movies within the DCEU and not reference the larger cinematic universe. That is unless you plan on have multiple Batmans on screen in different films.
 
Top Bottom