99% of voice acting sucks so who the hell cares?
i dont understand why you people even care about these reviews. No offense to our reviewer friends in this thread, but most of them know as much about games as we do. The only difference being they get paid and we dont.
These magazines\websites arent and shouldnt be looked at as if they were real intellectual examinations of game design. They are just consumer buying guides. People read the reviews, and if the complaints of the "reviewer" identify with things the reader doesnt like, who the hell cares? OMG one less person buys paper mario! The world will fall apart. I'm not saying these guys suck and this style of review should be destroyed forever. There is a market for this style of review, and of course not everyone is concerned with the theory behind the design of astro boy or the social issues dealt with in relation to the freedom of movement in GTA. The job of these guys is to tell you "this game is fun" or "this game is not fun." Some people might think GTA is the most fun game ever and give it a 100.10% and some people might think GTA is boring and give it a 52.39%. It doesnt really matter because each users idea of "fun" is different, and fun isnt something that you can guarantee.
The industry(in the west anyway, i dunno what they do in the east) is in serious need of an intellectual base that can analyze games as the art they are, not on whatever fanboy quotient it fills, or how much bloom lighting it uses. There are some really fascinating films out there that dont make you feel any emotion and are flat out "boring" to watch, there are games like this as well.
My point is this, I'm sure you all know by now that these "reviews" are opinion. One opinion will never be agreed to by everyone. So why even worry about it? Its more interesting to hear what makes the game compelling, when its not "omg the game is pretty and i love jumping on heads." Give us something real to chew on, we're hungry for it.