Hot take: Kingdom Hearts IV should be a Playstation Exclusive
- Thread starter kremit
- Start date
- Status
saintjules
Member
Switch the e and r in OPs name, then read the post again.
Mister Wolf
Member
Because that worked out so well for Square Enix with Final Fantasy 16 and Final Fantasy 7 Rebirth.
fallingdove
Member
Nah - Kingdom Hearts needs to go away for good. I hate what it has become.
What started as a light "hearted"
fusion of Disney and final fantasy became an entirely nonsensical universe devoid of final fantasy, absent any real stakes, and a free pass for Nomura to exercise his poorly aging game design philosophies.
I would hate for Sony to spend money to make KH4 exclusive. If I had to guess, this will be another flop and the final wake up call for SE before they have to gut the old guard and instead focus on making the titles that their fanbase are interested in.
What started as a light "hearted"
fusion of Disney and final fantasy became an entirely nonsensical universe devoid of final fantasy, absent any real stakes, and a free pass for Nomura to exercise his poorly aging game design philosophies.I would hate for Sony to spend money to make KH4 exclusive. If I had to guess, this will be another flop and the final wake up call for SE before they have to gut the old guard and instead focus on making the titles that their fanbase are interested in.
intheinbetween
Member
Yeah, I'm sure SE has learned anything from exclusives to this day, they should read OP's take
Signalis
Member
Would be great if more people can also play Mario games, Zelda games, Pokemon mainline games, metroid games etc. etc.
Gambit2483
Member
BennyBlanco
aka IMurRIVAL69
Square Enix plans to “aggressively pursue” multiplatform game releases
Square Enix has gotten bit by the multiplatform bug, too.
www.theverge.com
Not gonna happen
I feel like even our dear James would cringe reading this OP
Last edited:
Gameplay Gods Bless
Member
Game will probably be cross gen for PS6. 2027 at the earliest.
No I would play it if they did so.
I've already highlighted in a different comment that current "consoles" are inferior to handheld gaming PC's in the grand scheme of things. I am just fine with playing something like Spiderman with slightly reduced graphics whilst having access to almost every game. Which is kinda sad in a way.
"It's just a plastic box" yet it can project a lot more. I'm no console warrior but consoles such as the PS2 are well known for a reason.
-----------------------------------------------------------
ON a unrelated note there seems to be 2 kinds of comments in this thread:
1: Reasons why this would be a good/bad idea. Actual forum behaviour
2: Keyboard warring that has zero actual weight/consists of shit talking OP
If your comment fits the description of #2, just know anyone could deploy an LLM here backed by a few accounts and flip your insults back on you. An LLM never gets bored, will always have a answer and can create thousands of edits to gain popularity. Your techniques are outdated. This is a forum for discussion. Treat it like such.
Last edited:
NeoIkaruGAF
Gold Member
Yes please. Keep it contained.
Puscifer
Member
To an extent I understand why. It's the same reason you buy a Nintendo console: but unlike Nintendo, Square has zero reason to make a game exclusive anymore they aren't in the business of selling consoles and that's up to Sony's boutique studios to fill that exclusives gap not third parties.
Perrott
Member
As shown by the subpar technical side of Final Fantasy VII Rebirth, Square Enix doesn't have single-platform game-making capabilities in the AAA space on par with other Japanese publishers, which makes it needless to say that the end result would've been much worse (see the disaster that was Final Fantasy XV) had they gone for a day one multiplatform launch.
Honestly? They should limit their output to just making first-party games on a second-party capacity for Nintendo (i.e. Dragon Quest, Octopath, Bravely, etc) and PlayStation (Final Fantasy, Kingdom Hearts, Drakengard/NieR, Parasite Eve), in order to have access to the best-in-class technical support and technologies from the console markers themselves.
Honestly? They should limit their output to just making first-party games on a second-party capacity for Nintendo (i.e. Dragon Quest, Octopath, Bravely, etc) and PlayStation (Final Fantasy, Kingdom Hearts, Drakengard/NieR, Parasite Eve), in order to have access to the best-in-class technical support and technologies from the console markers themselves.
DonkeyPunchJr
World’s Biggest Weeb
BlackTron
Member
I mean I can kinda understand a purely business discussion of say "should Sony do X as a strategic move to help themselves"
But framing it as a feelings discussion like "I want an excuse to buy this very expensive box, this would solve that problem", you sir are a very weird dude
Anyway, I don't really think it's good for Square to be such a money hat whore. They needed to get away from it and stay away from it, for their own good. Even though I get the "vibes" of their IPs being firmly planted on PS in the past. They started getting all disjointed and weird with it. I think it hurts the brands, which means they are less worth money hatting the more they do it, so Sony should leave it alone now.
But framing it as a feelings discussion like "I want an excuse to buy this very expensive box, this would solve that problem", you sir are a very weird dude
Anyway, I don't really think it's good for Square to be such a money hat whore. They needed to get away from it and stay away from it, for their own good. Even though I get the "vibes" of their IPs being firmly planted on PS in the past. They started getting all disjointed and weird with it. I think it hurts the brands, which means they are less worth money hatting the more they do it, so Sony should leave it alone now.
New low reached: calling someone a retard over a video game with zero context.
I'm not gonna be surprised if this is an alt. I'm also not going to be surprised if this user mysteriously gets banned
Last edited:
- Status