Why would Ford want Elsie dead? That doesn't really make sense.
I think people are missing that Elsie discovered something else when she was grabbed, even after naming Teresa.
It's possibly Ford or Bernard's culpability.
Why would Ford want Elsie dead? That doesn't really make sense.
Hale makes a comment that a blood sacrifice is needed, so does Ford. This either means that he is only just surveiling, and or Hale is a host. (Which would explain her specific choice of decommissioned host)
I'm getting Battlestar Galactica vibes here. Trust no one.
Yup. This is definitely not a projection from the person posting this. MiamiWesker is obviously not a totally emotional and crazy person.
The use of caps is clearly not an indication of emotional attachment to something potentially clouding any judgement. The statement that follows is certainly not hyperbole of any kind.
Said poster is not exhibiting emotional behavior at all. None.
Only 2 were new to "cold" storage. The father and the milk guy. It was probably between those two since they were the least melted wax looking. Why would they choose one they had to repair their physical appearance. They needed one specifically to pass as a human.
Who says Elsie is dead?The actress is listed as appearing in 9 episodes this season.
Because she found out that someone with very high level access was tampering with the hosts?Why would Ford want Elsie dead? That doesn't really make sense.
Yea I'm starting to think this is a bad show being held up by Hopkin's acting.
It feels like the writing just collapsed. Management is completely inept to the point that who the fuck would trust these stooges with genius level AI?
Ed Harris is amazing, too. The acting in general is THE thing about the show so far.
The real Arnold is the friends we made along the way.
I really like Ed Harris, but beyond liking him I don't see much amazing acting there personally. He's pretty incredibly one-note. Bernard and Hopkins and papa Abernathy have been my personal acting standouts. And Evan Rachel wood.Ed Harris is amazing, too. The acting in general is THE thing about the show so far.
Oh you know what I mean. How can the grand majority be super positive last week and now be very negative right after. We go through some extreme mood swings at times, not just this thread of course.
I mean, isn't that what the park is supposed to do? If that was a quest in red dead or mass effect, of course you could black hat your way to leading that gang.Seeing dipshit Logan return as the leader of the Confederados got a big laugh out of me for some reason. I think he's the second dumbest character after the redhead butcher. So of course he returns as the leader of the guys who were gonna kill him. And of course he's in love with it because he's a total moron.
So I finally caught up to the show last night.
I see the theories and see how William is probably MIB but I don't get why MIB would torture or rape Dolores in the current timeline if he actually fell in love with her 30 years ago?
The more I think about the Bernard firing event, the more I think Theresa going along with Bernard doesn't make sense. Theresa is part of the hostile take over fraction who used tricks to get Bernard fired.
It never actually showed him torturing or raping her - we don't know what happens in that barn. But I think that the trauma allows them to remember past iterations and his ultimate goal is setting them free.I see the theories and see how William is probably MIB but I don't get why MIB would torture or rape Dolores in the current timeline if he actually fell in love with her 30 years ago?
I am curious if many people who love this show are the same ones that loved The Leftovers? I am one of them.
Ah I guess it's Elsie that is being made in Ford's basement. Though everything pointed to Theresa, since Bernard studied her so...intimately
Is it confirmed though? We see Dolores having flashbacks in William's timeline. So unless there are three timelines something doesn't add up.Agreed that the whole MIB=William thing was too expected and a bit of a letdown to see it confirmed.
Yes, big time, and I was just thinking it gets the same feels out of me as The Leftovers earlier when watching the latest ep.
Loving this show, does my head in.
Is it confirmed though? We see Dolores having flashbacks in William's timeline. So unless there are three timelines something doesn't add up.
Clearly Hemsworth Sr. is realizing things aren't kosher with Bernard, so either he's getting iced or he's going to play a part in blowing the whistle on Ford.
I subscribe to multiple Bernard theory.
Or he uncovers everything and then says "Doesn't look like anything to me."
Or he uncovers everything and then says "Doesn't look like anything to me."
Or he uncovers everything and then says "Doesn't look like anything to me."
I asked this before. But which are the same people being super positive last week and very negative this week?
One of the contradictory points is that MiB said when he first came, he opened a host and saw he was made up of robot parts. But Im pretty sure when William is around, the hosts are made up of bio-synthetic materials.
Have we seen him open up one?
Yeah it really isn't confirmed.
And honestly the scene with the church being buried sort of suggests william /= mib.
That whole sequence is weird though. Dolores is clearly a very unreliable narrator by her own admission. She doesn't know what's real so it's hard to make any definitive conclusions about any timelines.
The entrance host being a part of the new narrative also doesn't confirm anything. She may have been role swapped specifically for the new narrative.
My money is on the Dolores william timeline not being 30ish years ago. There is an alt timeline but mib isn't william.
I loved that there was a big boss fight in this episode. MIB needed NPC help to take it down.
So happy that they are re-using that guy again. Hopefully he has a lot of scenes.
Still the best actor on the show with one scene;
Choosing the dad in cold storage was George Lucas tier writing unless there was some yet to be explained intent.