^ To be fair, plenty of straight people can exhibit behaviors typically associated with the opposite gender And I don't see the harm in saying "I'm not a stereotypical ________", when you're just trying to describe yourself.
^ To be fair, plenty of straight people can exhibit behaviors typically associated with the opposite gender And I don't see the harm in saying "I'm not a stereotypical ________", when you're just trying to describe yourself.
Or we can let people act they way they wish to act, you can advise them sure. But accept how they wish to act, and get with it or get gone.
That is.... well life.
Of course. Problem is, you shouldn't fuel the hate. I believe minorities must support their own cause, not to themselves a disservice. Some people that are LGBT rights activists are also complaining about that.
Again, no problem with effeminate guys. Some are even straight. The problem is with a large part of the community acting even "worse" than effeminate guys to confrom to an image they think represents what they are. But it's like that with everything, clichés are born and fueled from that.
I'll tell you why I'm thinking like that. When I was 21 I met a guy and had a relationship with him. Until then I was dating only girls and am still attracted to them. Up to that point I never understood the hate of gay people.
From there for many people around me and people I met, I was gay, I couldn't be something else! I had many comments about how I don't look like a gay guy and that it was weird. I got gay jokes. I got friends giving me the cold shoulder because they couldn't think of me any way else than dancing half naked in gay bars wearing strings.
I got punched for that same reason, people associated me to that even though I didn't conform to their vision of gay people (or because of it).
It was a nightmare. I was a victim of something other people were doing. Straight guys and girls confused who I were and what they expected me to be. Some told me they didn't know "normal" gays existed.
Dafuq.
Of course ultimately the fault resides in people judging and hating. But some just don't know anything else. It's also why "normal" public gay guys are reluctant to come out.
Case in point, actor Matt Bomer. Recently came out (discretly) and being the target of people saying he shouldn't play straight guys in movies because they can't believe it . See the Christian Grey story with him.
I can see what you are saying, but at the end of the day.
They aren't fueling hate.
The people who hate are fueling hate.
Instead of teaching people who to act different teach people how to hate less.
I'm just saying people would hate less if they were seeing more gays acting like human beings and not circus freaks. And it would be easier than to educate people not to hate.
In the end I don't know anymore whose fault it is.
I've had recently an interesting discussion with an arab guy telling me he started to resent other arab guys because they were so many conforming to the stealing treacherous arab guy type.
I guess it's similar when I see people posting in crime threads "please don't be black please don't be black...fuck"
And yes I know of both of things you are talking about, however your friend shouldnt resent ofther Arabic people because they act a certain way, he should resent them if they are acting like an asshole.
While being gay does give a different perspective i would've never had being straight(at least generally speaking) The perspective on others equality and other minorities is so different, i don't think people truly understand. People like to compare getting rid of homophobia to getting rid of racism. They're vastly different struggles, that some people like being black and gay experience both ends, but is not a type of hatred that can nor should be put next to each other to see how they equal out. Cause like others said, there is nothing more "interesting" than our fellow gays being just as racist as anyone else. its really sad.I'll be the first to say "man, being gay really changes your perspective on equality and minorities"
I can see what you are saying, but at the end of the day.
They aren't fueling hate.
The people who hate are fueling hate.
Instead of teaching people who to act different teach people how to hate less.
My point is, some are acting gay and that's not "who they are'. Your sexuality doesn't define your personnality, nor the way you walk, talk, I'm sorry. This shit needs to die.
When I was a kid I had a neighbour, same age as me. It was the most effeminate guy I've ever known. Never judged him. He was always like that.
My problem is elsewhere. And seriously, what you can see of the gay community when you're straight certainly does not do it any good. To many straight guys, gay people just look like fucking circus freaks and certainly not normal people. Again, media is also responsible for that.
Hate crimes are partly born from that too.
There is nothing wrong with the way very camp people act, an it's their life, they have every right to act that way.
However. It does give the haters fuel. Should they stop because of this? no, like I said their life. Don't bury your head in the sand though, if all gays were masculine/normal blah blah then there would be far less ignorant homophobia around today. Can't really say same for religious homophobia tho I guess.
One thing you can take a pot shot at though is pride, streets littered with gay guys getting drunk and shagging anything in site. Does terrible things for our image and THAT is what gays become associated with, hate Pride these days with a passion. It used to have a purpose and a very important one, now it's just a gang bang piss up.
The problem is that for some reason we're not allowed to hate specific groups of people anymore
I don't think there's anything wrong with being turned off or annoyed by behavior/personality traits, such as an excessively flamboyant person: be it a "stereotypical" gay man or a "dudebro" straight meathead. A person can find someone's behavior to be a giant turn off without being bigoted, IE treating people equally even if you don't like their personality.
It's a good thing straight people never act like crazy circus freaks, as someone else mentioned, amirite? What's your opinion of Mardi Gras?There is nothing wrong with the way very camp people act, an it's their life, they have every right to act that way.
However. It does give the haters fuel. Should they stop because of this? no, like I said their life. Don't bury your head in the sand though, if all gays were masculine/normal blah blah then there would be far less ignorant homophobia around today. Can't really say same for religious homophobia tho I guess.
One thing you can take a pot shot at though is pride, streets littered with gay guys getting drunk and shagging anything in site. Does terrible things for our image and THAT is what gays become associated with, hate Pride these days with a passion. It used to have a purpose and a very important one, now it's just a gang bang piss up.
They're kinda spot on with the problem really being the way large parts of society define masculinity/feminity - as rather solid characteristics you belong to based on your gender.
You're a woman?
Be a woman, you're so emotionally attuned to others and such a caretaker.
Man?
Act like a man, damnit. Grow some balls!
That's just a big massive shame, and the problem is two-fold. First, that we have the masculine/feminine meta-categories in the first place. I honestly don't see the benefit of describing someone as masculine over whatever traits you ascribe to masculinity. At best, it becomes a way of quickly signalling a partial personality description ("He is masculine, social conventions define masculinity as the following, therefore he is the following"); but that relies on a definition that is solid - which is probably why resistance to a solid, unmalleable definition is met with specific gender-behavioural relationship reinforcement.
Sadly, in the form of violence, as these matters aren't ever thought over at length by homophobes and misognists.
Man is not acting in accordance to our pre-defined view of what a man constitute (E.g. masculinity, which in turns encompass speaking in a gruff voice, not crying, not... ), therefore let's smash his head in.
So the meta-categories makes this so much easier, because it makes labeling and enforcing so much simpler to those who don't put much thought into these matters. The second problem is why we're ascribing the constitutent characteristics of these meta-categories to groups of individuals, divided up per gender, in the first place.
Why does it benefit us to consider women, for an example, to be soft?
To be more emotional, to be more empathic, to be more sensitive?
What could we possibly gain from categorically say that half the population of this planet, 3.45 or so billion unique individuals, are this and that?
So yeah, that's me rambling a bit.
Exactly. I hate it when people mostly straight people say things like our pride is too outrageous or wild. Or the way we are is " this" way. It's not different than the many carnivals, parades and any other human behavior in celebration and pride as anyone else. At least here in the US before we gays had our pride parades and other demonstrations of self and community pride, straight people have been doing crazy and revealing things long before. Like you said mardi gras, one can say events like Woodstock or cochlea and of course go to a beach and look around.It's a good thing straight people never act like crazy circus freaks, as someone else mentioned, amirite? What's your opinion of Mardi Gras?
Specific groups of people annoy me, and the trends, actions and appearence tied to those groups of people also annoy me. As a gay male, I hate, hate, overly effeminate and flamboyant men, straight or gay. I hate these people as much as I hate hipsters and jocks. The problem is that for some reason we're not allowed to hate specific groups of people anymore, and fuck that. If you're acting like someone who has been hit in the head with a shovel, I will treat you appropriately, if you don't know how to use a belt, then why do you deserve my attention and appreciation of your lifestyle or culture.
People use the race card, the sexism card, the ____ card for whatever suits, them, well fuck that, you don't deserve to drag these various groups through the mud because it lets you be an annoying prick, and this happens way too often. I'm tolerent of you, I am not tolerent of your behaviour and your representation of the culture, subculture, sexuality or ethnicitiy.
So err... What if you're just yourself? I don't fit the gay stereotype but I also don't fit the MACHO ALPHA DERP DERP shit. I usually say "That's fucking stupid" When someone says what a "Real man" is
I don't think there's anything wrong with being turned off or annoyed by behavior/personality traits, such as an excessively flamboyant person: be it a "stereotypical" gay man or a "dudebro" straight meathead. A person can find someone's behavior to be a giant turn off without being bigoted, IE treating people equally even if you don't like their personality.
The worse thing you can be imo is boring.
I'm sorry, but I'm boring and proud of it. I was born this way.
omg :CYou're a stereotype because you just are. Everyone is.
You'd be surprised how common racism and sexism is among gay people. Maybe not as common as among straight people, but it is definitely there.
Exactly. I hate it when people mostly straight people say things like our pride is too outrageous or wild. Or the way we are is " this" way. It's not different than the many carnivals, parades and any other human behavior in celebration and pride as anyone else. At least here in the US before we gays had our pride parades and other demonstrations of self and community pride, straight people have been doing crazy and revealing things long before. Like you said mardi gras, one can say events like Woodstock or cochlea and of course go to a beach and look around.
I think there's a difference between personal distaste and the asinine argument that a) especially effeminate men are being inauthentic, b) that they are not acting like human beings, c) arguing that it is partly the fault of effeminate gays for behaving like... effeminate gays that we have problems with hatred, and not the fact that we have millennia old cultural injunction against men. Some gay people aren't "just normal people," and blaming them for bigotry they have to face in far greater proportion than stereotypical masculine gay men is absurd.
It seems like there's a signalling mechanism component to some of the behaviors that are "learned" rather than grounded in personal expression, but its hard to tell with an individual where one ends and the other begins.I think there's a difference between personal distaste and the asinine argument that a) especially effeminate men are being inauthentic, b) that they are not acting like human beings, c) arguing that it is partly the fault of effeminate gays for behaving like... effeminate gays that we have problems with hatred, and not the fact that we have millennia old cultural injunction against men. Some gay people aren't "just normal people," and blaming them for bigotry they have to face in far greater proportion than stereotypical masculine gay men is absurd.
So err... What if you're just yourself? I don't fit the gay stereotype but I also don't fit the MACHO ALPHA DERP DERP shit. I usually say "That's fucking stupid" When someone says what a "Real man" is
I'm not blaming them for anything
It seems like there's a signalling mechanism component to some of the behaviors that are "learned" rather than grounded in personal expression, but its hard to tell with an individual where one ends and the other begins.
Pride sucks, sorry. Are all carnivals wild and crazy? Yes, but other carnivals are not the main event related to a minority that struggles with equality and ignorance. As a social movement it's probably even harmful, and again, we're not all represented by carnival-like events. You don't educate people about homosexuality with a loud and silly parade that hardly represents most gay people in the first place.
Pride sucks, sorry. Are all carnivals wild and crazy? Yes, but other carnivals are not the main event related to a minority that struggles with equality and ignorance. As a social movement it's probably even harmful, and again, we're not all represented by carnival-like events. You don't educate people about homosexuality with a loud and silly parade that hardly represents most gay people in the first place.
My point is, some are acting gay and that's not "who they are'. Your sexuality doesn't define your personnality, nor the way you walk, talk, I'm sorry. This shit needs to die.
When I was a kid I had a neighbour, same age as me. It was the most effeminate guy I've ever known. Never judged him. He was always like that.
My problem is elsewhere. And seriously, what you can see of the gay community when you're straight certainly does not do it any good. To many straight guys, gay people just look like fucking circus freaks and certainly not normal people. Again, media is also responsible for that.
Hate crimes are partly born from that too.
I think there's a difference between personal distaste and the asinine argument that a) especially effeminate men are being inauthentic, b) that they are not acting like human beings, c) arguing that it is partly the fault of effeminate gays for behaving like... effeminate gays that we have problems with hatred, and not the fact that we have millennia old cultural injunction against men. Some gay people aren't "just normal people," and blaming them for bigotry they have to face in far greater proportion than stereotypical masculine gay men is absurd.
Nope Most people in the world haven't been to one. I don't want to excuse my ignorance, but I think I'm actually an example of how these might not be very effective in educating people about homosexuality.Pride is more than the parade, you know. Have you ever been to one?
You know, that's kind of the part where I don't agree completely. The "gay rights" thing should be way more important than the celebration part.10 years ago i might have agreed with you, but now having been to a few, most of the people going to the parades and such aren't gay. They're people celebrating gay people. In the parades here in Seattle, there's an incredibly diverse selection of people. Huge companies make appearances with their gay employees. Starbucks, Boeing, Microsoft, Google, Chase, etc. Politicians, gay geeks, animal shelters, etc. Straight families come and watch them.
I would argue that this very observation and the fact that it keeps on diversifying and bringing more groups into it is fairly decent evidence that your last sentence is false. It has grown into much more than just a gay rights thing, but a celebration of diversity for all people.
I remember watching a television clip in europe one time, and there was some straight elderly lady (late 80s early 90s?) that had come out to watch one of the parades. They'd asked her why she was there and she just thought the whole experience was pretty amazing to witness and it was such a positive thing.
But this is part of the problem. I think it's completely fair for people to hate the effeminate personalities that people have developed, just like there are many people who hate the gang culture. There are a lot of examples of black-gang culture being hated by the black community.
How horrible it would be for many parents to have children that idolizes a gay person. Funny thing is they already would do so anyway when the sexual preference is unknown or wrongly assumed.
uhhhh
How horrible it would be for many parents to have children that idolizes a gay person. Funny thing is they already would do so anyway when the sexual preference is unknown or wrongly assumed.
uhhhh what the fuck?
Maybe because the gang culture is violent... When I start getting attacked by fem queens on the boulevard, I'll start hating them too.
Maybe because the gang culture is violent... When I start getting attacked by fem queens on the boulevard, I'll start hating them too.
10 years ago i might have agreed with you, but now having been to a few, most of the people going to the parades and such aren't gay. They're people celebrating gay people. In the parades here in Seattle, there's an incredibly diverse selection of people. Huge companies make appearances with their gay employees. Starbucks, Boeing, Microsoft, Google, Chase, etc. Politicians, gay geeks, animal shelters, etc. Straight families come and watch them.
I would argue that this very observation and the fact that it keeps on diversifying and bringing more groups into it is fairly decent evidence that your last sentence is false. It has grown into much more than just a gay rights thing, but a celebration of diversity for all people.
I remember watching a television clip in europe one time, and there was some straight elderly lady (late 80s early 90s?) that had come out to watch one of the parades. They'd asked her why she was there and she just thought the whole experience was pretty amazing to witness and it was such a positive thing.
Nope Most people in the world haven't been to one. I don't want to excuse my ignorance, but I think I'm actually an example of how these might not be very effective in educating people about homosexuality.
You know, that's kind of the part where I don't agree completely. The "gay rights" thing should be way more important than the celebration part.