Finished
End of Discussion: How the Left's Outrage Industry Shuts Down Debate, Manipulates Voters, and Makes America Less Free (and Fun)
End of Discussion is an excellent chronicle of the Outrage Industry which has worked well to try to shut down anybody that disagrees with their viewpoints. Though they come from the Left and have often been ones to embrace people of diverse backgrounds who may not have had an opportunity to have their chance to have a voice heard, it seems the ones who are on the Left now, probably the far left, are using it as their excuse to why they are the only ones that deserve to be heard and not anyone else. Its kind of odd really since they are now doing the very thing that the other side did to them in the pre civil rights era. I found it most interesting when popular mascots for the Left were at times also targeted by the same Outrage Circus for saying something they didnt agree with. The chapter on checking their privilege was highly enlightening as it showed that something created by that side could also harm others there since no one has gone through every type of situation. I was also disturbed that that Outrage Circus carries so much weight they they are even trying to get Trigger Warnings placed in college syllabi, out college professors who they disgree with on social issues, and get rid of certain student groups on campus. One of the points briefly touched on was sometimes the people in these areas are not even ever finding the things offensive, or in one extreme example in which someone complained about the Cards Against Humanity game and they taking offense to one card, they found themselves baffled when they received comments from others asking why they werent offended by the other cards.
The book probably can be best be summed up by
be not wise in thine own eyes. When people are like this, or rather, taking the position of the
Absolute Moral Authority, they end up throwing all logic and reasoning out the door, end all forms of discussion and work hard to ignore anyone else. Some of the people even seemed to follow faulty logic and reasoning or worst saying statistics that were calculated incorrectly (for example the White House Male Female Wage ratio just grouping every full time wage person together and dividing instead of focusing on male females in the same position), and always saying that number when the one who calculated it said it was problematic and took too many assumptions). It was interesting in that scenario to at least hear from people that wage is not everything to a job or that not everyone aspires to be a CEO or work in an office. What was most important was that they did say people ought to negotiate to ensure they are earning a fair amount for the position they are in. Personally, knowing more of the truth helps people be open minded and see through things that some people are trying to force them to believe. If you are knowledgeable then one is able to establish a position and hopefully debate reasonably about it.
Many examples in the book are well known and probably sad to see that there are times when people with differing and respectful opinions are shut down and silenced even by the government. Though perhaps when there is a President that touts "The Time for Talk Is Over," we get numerous court orders saying that people are compelled by law to compromise the very religious beliefs that inspire their lives, which is the cost of citizenship (Elane Photography taken to court for not agreeing to take photos of a gay wedding), and in the other situation of the Giffords not willing to let a Gay wedding take place on their own home ground, that is the court ruled that they deserved a warning to the intolerant fanatics who continue to labor under the ludicrous misconception that theyre free to live out their religious beliefs within the confines of their own personal homes. Surely they could have entertained some debate about this issue. Other examples were people on the Left interrupting numerous functions of elected officials and trying to impede or block voting, impede other functions by shouting to drown out the leader speaking, or even make exceptions to Left oriented movements and not for the Right ones, for example the Occupy movement in which they illegally stayed in places to try to get their point across (while the Tea Party ones had to painstakingly follow the laws for how to do a protest). Of course no one from the Occupy movement had to pay the same fees.
All in all really interesting read. The writers are great and personable, the footnotes were often hilarious and inquisitive, and often the points made were at times not just focused on perpetrators of the Left but also those on the right, so it was nice to see that they attempted to focus on both sides. A few points were weak such as the transexual chapter, though that seemed more on people just being confused ultimately on how to handle the situation with terminology and even transgenders in the spotlight shutting down any sort of discussion from people trying to understand what they go through when interviewed on TV (Katie Couric interview for example). Some chapters were also short but they did get the points across fast (people being misled by the loud noise over gun issues in America, but we have like over 200 pages of Federal laws on it and crimes involving guns have been their lowest since 1920s, people focusing on stricter gun control but not on mental health issues, followed by the voting issues chapter, and that voting fraud is real, when 13000 people who are deceased are still on rolls and some people are voting as them...something is still wrong, but Leftists framing it that the Right is using it as a device of racism)