I've been wanting to read Don DeLillo for a while now, but haven't found a good entry-level novel of his (admittedly due to lack of research on my part) since I'm not a fan of Postmodernism. However, this seems like a really interesting story and it might be what I'm looking for.
South of the Border West of the Sun without a doubt. I like it better than Norwegian Wood. It's similar in format - an adult looking back on his life and reflecting on his experiences of love, loss, and so on. If you like stuff in this style, I would also recommend looking for his short story collections instead. When he has less space for story, they naturally become more personal vignettes, which is probably what you're looking for.
Out of his weirder story driven works, my favorite is Hard-boiled Wonderland. You might want to give that a try.
Underground is a great read if you're interested in having insight into the Tokyo Subway Gas Attacks though. It's not a fiction novel, but rather a series of interviews Murakami conducted with survivors, family of victims, and members of the cult involved.
Started Stephen King's Joyland...hope its better then MR.Mercedes.
Really enjoying it so far.
A whole day early....I know what I'm doing at work today.
Working like a responsible, productive employee?
Hi, if you are reading this, boss.
So Mark Z. Danielewski of House of Leaves fame has a new book out today:
Reviews are polarized, to say the least. The Guardian called it unreadable. Still, I'm intrigued. Anyone here gonna give it a shot?
Mumei, Children of God is awesome. That is all.
A whole day early....I know what I'm doing at work today.
uuuuurgahsdfalkd, so jealous. Was just about to ask if anyone had read an advanced reader's copy or something.
Looking around for some good sci fi books to read, landed on these 3: Hyperion, Neuromancer and stranger in a strange land. Which of these 3 would you guys recommend that I read first? Which is most enjoyable and though provoking?
Nappucino, read Hyperion!
Awesome! Now I'm down to selecting between 2 books.Personally, I'd suggest Neuromancer, though I haven't read Hyperion.
Stranger in a Strange Land was not anything I would consider enjoyable.
Your excitement has made my selection process all the more difficultNappucino, read Hyperion!
Stranger in a Strange Land is probably the most 'important' but I'd go with Hyperion or Neuromancer first. I had more fun with Neuromancer but both books are great. Its a toss up really.Looking around for some good sci fi books to read, landed on these 3: Hyperion, Neuromancer and stranger in a strange land. Which of these 3 would you guys recommend that I read first? Which is most enjoyable and though provoking?
This.Nappucino, read Hyperion!
Well that's the Dark Tower finished, it was quite the journey....The parts in the book with Steven King were a little weird, I can see why they were written but as soon as he made his appearance in the books my immersion in the story broke. When I read, whatever I'm reading is (temporarily) real in my head for the duration of the book/story. As soon as SK made his appearance it kind of killed the magic of the book and I couldn't completely push the 'its just a story' out of my mind which hindered my enjoyment a little.
Finished The Fifth Heart today. It was .. ok. It started strong and then kind of meandered and delved into the personal lives of the main character's friend for no particular reason and then with about 50 pages to go Simmons was like "oh yeah I have to finish this book!" The main mystery of the story was more or less an after thought. Drood was so much better by comparison.
Now on to Stoner. I zipped through about 10% in a few minutes and already love it. Can't wait to read more.
Stoner by John Williams
I also read Brandon Sanderson's Words of Radiance recently, which was, hands down, one of the best fantasy books I've read in years! Apart from that, I read The Unbearable Lightness of Being, by Milan Kundera, which was a very good read up on different perspectives on lives.
Colorless Tsukuru Tazaki and His Years of Pilgrimage
This was okay. Pretty sad in context, but also oddly unaffecting compared to many of Murakami's other works. It seems to lack the atmosphere and moody tone which defines his better character pieces. It's much closer to Norwegian Wood and South of the Border than his more complex works, but lacks flavor of both those works. The Nagoya Tsukuru grew up in doesn't really feel like a unique place in his memory so much as a story device to reconnect him with his past. Everything also feels so straightforward and linear, that even with the quirks along the way it almost feels lazy. In the sense, maybe the tone it was going for was a reflection of the protagonist himself - someone who clearly has interesting qualities and is capable of attracting the attention of others, but lacks the self-confidence to take advantage of that and is instead content believing that he is something much plainer and emptier. Regardless of intent, I don't think this was particularly memorable.
South of the Border West of the Sun without a doubt. I like it better than Norwegian Wood. It's similar in format - an adult looking back on his life and reflecting on his experiences of love, loss, and so on. If you like stuff in this style, I would also recommend looking for his short story collections instead. When he has less space for story, they naturally become more personal vignettes, which is probably what you're looking for.
Out of his weirder story driven works, my favorite is Hard-boiled Wonderland. You might want to give that a try.
Underground is a great read if you're interested in having insight into the Tokyo Subway Gas Attacks though. It's not a fiction novel, but rather a series of interviews Murakami conducted with survivors, family of victims, and members of the cult involved.
I'm very interested in Ancient Rome. I will indeed check that out. Thanks for the rec.Make sure to check out Augustus by Williams after you finish Stoner if you're at all interested in ancient Rome.
-one of the aforementioned telepaths who carries a tree around because it helps her be a telepath or something
Started Kevin J Anderson's The Dark Between the Stars, one of the Hugo nominees this year. I made it about six chapter in before putting it down in boredom. At the six chapter mark, we've met a whole bunch of characters and had a bunch of POVs (one per chapter, jeez, give us something solid to hang onto), but none of them are particularly interesting.
We've got:
-brave whistleblower man, stealing a spaceship and fleeing with his kid
-bad mom, who works for evil businessman and cares too much about work and not enough about the above kid
-some pilot of some kind of fancy ship? I dunno, this part was loaded with random exposition about mages and emeperors and telepaths and other vaguely fantasy novel shit? So I kind of lost track.
-one of the aforementioned telepaths who carries a tree around because it helps her be a telepath or something
-an archivist (and his noble savage warrior woman pal). This was the most interesting one, as he had something to do and had a personality. Unfortunately he also told us straight-faced that the novices in this temple he was visiting became full priests by memorizing a billion-line poem. Um. Even if you could memorize a line a second and literally never did anything else including sleep, that would take 32 years. Since you can't memorize a line a second and you do have to sleep... yeah sorry, this is too dumb for me to get past. (Also I checked the chapter listings, and it looked like the archivist didn't get another POV for like thirty chapters. Come on man, this was the only one that grabbed me at all!)
I had a conversation with Mumei yesterday about "show don't tell." My feeling is that it's overbroad advice that might be useful for novice writers but shouldn't be taken to an extreme, and because people do tend to take it to an extreme, I'm not a big fan of it. Of course, that was before I read Kevin J Anderson. Someone should've really given this dude that advice somewhere along the way. Good God the writing is dull and plodding and telly.
This book is part of the "Sad Puppies" slate for the Hugo Awards, on the basis that Kevin J Anderson has been around a long time and hasn't won a Hugo yet, and that this is probably because of the liberal cabal that works to prevent milSF authors from winning. Frankly, after reading this, I'm pretty sure I know why he hasn't won any awards.