Kyleripman
Member
About to start this:
I loved this, and the second one is even better. Such playful, creative books.
About to start this:
Finished.
I judge books (and by extension, authors) by how well they can draw emotions out of me, and the emotion I have the most appreciation for, as a literary tool, is sadness. By this metric David Levithan's Two Boys Kissing is one of the best books I've ever read. The book mainly consists of vignettes about various boys and their relationships (or lack thereof) with friends, family and each other, narrated by a chorus of those lost to AIDs in the 70s and 80s. It's the narrative device, that I think, is the real triumph of this book.
Instead of throwing facts and dates and persons and numbers at us like a Wikipedia article, what Levithan does is capture the emotions of those who died to AIDs by letting them speak through the narrators, as if they were still watching over the LGBT youth of today. They are simultaneously envious of, concerned by, proud of, dismayed by, heartbroken by and joyful of their legacy and the inheritors of their legacy. It's the side of history that people never really get to see in school, which is usually very dry and emotionally distanced. If history is cataloging the facts of the past, then stories like these serve to remember the experience.
And it must be a very harrowing experience indeed. Usually, when I'm reading any kind of book with an emotional climax, there's a build up, a peak, and then the denouement. If there are tears to be shed then it's either at the peak or the denouement. However, while reading Two Boys Kissing, I found my eyes regularly being blurred by tears, always at the segments where the narrators are recounting their lives and their losses. Somehow it feels so much more real, even though the narration is vague enough that it could be attributed to anything.
A Prayer for Owen Meany sounds really wonderful, I'll have to check that out.
A Prayer for Owen Meany sounds really wonderful, I'll have to check that out.
Still undecided what I want to jump into next. I'm in football mode now, so I might check out something like Friday Night Lights, but I'm kinda itching to get back to some sci-fi/fantasy, but something still fun. I might start a Dresden book or something too.
Dang it.
Help me pick guys: The Stranger by Albert Camus or Pale Fire by Nabokov or ??????
Finally finished Shift Omnibus. I didn't enjoy it. Throwaway characters and too many plot holes. Howey's writing lacks pace without a proper mystery driving it.
Still listening to Physics of the Impossible. I think it's going to ruin a lot of sci-fi books for me lol
Started this up. Needed a guaranteed good time after a few lackluster books.
The Iron Jackal by Chris Wooding
It's amazing. I've pushed it on so many people over the years, and I don't know that any of them have regretted it.
Just don't let anyone sell you on the Simon Birch movie; it's only based on the first half of Owen Meany. Good movie, but only half the story, and a stripped down half at that.
I think I've mentioned it before, but the Galactic Football series by Scott Sigler is good stuff. 1 part Mass Effect/Star Wars, 1 part Any Given Sunday and 1 part Godfather. Really like them, cheap too.
Playing for Pizza by John Grisham is also one of my favorites.
Started this up. Needed a guaranteed good time after a few lackluster books.
The Iron Jackal by Chris Wooding
Read The Long Ships, ShaneB. Be .. ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US!
oooh didn't know there was a new one out. I loved the previous two books, this is going on my to-read list.
oooh didn't know there was a new one out. I loved the previous two books, this is going on my to-read list.
Yeah, I share your dissatisfaction with the ending. It seemed so weak compared to the sheer density of all the preceding prose. I guess by the end Levithan ran out of emotional ammo.I liked the book but the ending let it down. It feels so halfhearted and unsatisfying.
It's weird because the book is so incredibly poignant (heart achingly so) in so many other places but the characters' endings are incredibly underwhelming.
I must be the only person to absolutely hate the novel.It's amazing. I've pushed it on so many people over the years, and I don't know that any of them have regretted it.
Just don't let anyone sell you on the Simon Birch movie; it's only based on the first half of Owen Meany. Good movie, but only half the story, and a stripped down half at that.
There's actually a 4th one coming out this month. Ace of Skulls
The fourth and final book, Ace of Skulls, comes out on September 19th in the UK.
Finished Mr. Monster
then went straight to the next book in the series: I Don't Want To Kill You:
I'm really surprised by how much I liked them. I've never watched Dexter who seems kind of similar to protagonist of the books so it was something completely new to me.
I read The Stranger, and thought it was a downer. Couldn't finish it. Pale Fire, on the other hand, had me in awe from start to finish. For what it's worth.
The air smelled of paper and dust and years.
Due to seeing another Gaf members post I decided to start on Retribution Falls
I love all the covers of his books. Makes me want to jump in and read them.
<3Finished:
The praise on the last pages and the Firefly comparision got me interested. And so far Reading-Gaf has never let me down.
<3
No literary masterpiece, but the books are just so damn fun. I'm both excited for and sad that the series is ending in a couple of days.
I think my next book will be one of these:
Sabrial
Example: I would love to read some fun space opera, but I either get "it's a masterpiece that will make you think" or "it's basically fan fiction". Why can't we have "good, but fun" books?
i read this
i thought it was absolutely brilliant. it's a thriller of sorts about the relationship between two men - a cynical british war journalist and an idealistic american cia agent - in love with the same woman, set in the conflicts of 50s vietnam. for something written in the fifties it's frighteningly relevant to modern politics - when you hear people talking simplistically about intervention in syria it echoes much of what the book tackles.
greene's prose is wonderful - sort of combining a sparse style that i dug in le carre's 'the spy who came in from the cold' with a stunning eye for a description. i loved the 50s vietnam setting - smoking opium and hanging out in french cafes with hand grenade barriers is very different to the typical vietnam war stories, though when the story takes intimately you into the conflict between the french colonialists and the vietnamese communists it's as chilling as any war fiction i've seen.
I wish we had more "fun" books. There's this seeming culture clash right now between "high literature" and "crap".
Example: I would love to read some fun space opera, but I either get "it's a masterpiece that will make you think" or "it's basically fan fiction". Why can't we have "good, but fun" books?
I vote for this.
Oops, I posted that from my other account. Here it is again from me:
Read the Vorkosigan books! Immediately!
I wish we had more "fun" books. There's this seeming culture clash right now between "high literature" and "crap".
Example: I would love to read some fun space opera, but I either get "it's a masterpiece that will make you think" or "it's basically fan fiction". Why can't we have "good, but fun" books?
Ditto.
I'm always open to "fun" book recommendations. I love a good adventure, and am always looking for "Indiana Jones" style books.
Seconded. Amazing series.
Edit: Thought I was quoting the "Sabriel" statement but don't see it in the quote. Hmm. Anyway, yes to Sabriel.
It was in my list for the next book I read and he voted that. I started American Gods and it seems cool, but since it's a one off it wont take me long and I'll get to Sabrial right after.
Backlog is huge atm.
You can't just drop that on me and leave! You gotta tell me what else is interesting so I can pay attention for it!
This book's really big yo. I might not end up reading it twice.
i read this
i thought it was absolutely brilliant. it's a thriller of sorts about the relationship between two men - a cynical british war journalist and an idealistic american cia agent - in love with the same woman, set in the conflicts of 50s vietnam. for something written in the fifties it's frighteningly relevant to modern politics - when you hear people talking simplistically about intervention in syria it echoes much of what the book tackles.
greene's prose is wonderful - sort of combining a sparse style that i dug in le carre's 'the spy who came in from the cold' with a stunning eye for a description. i loved the 50s vietnam setting - smoking opium and hanging out in french cafes with hand grenade barriers is very different to the typical vietnam war stories, though when the story takes intimately you into the conflict between the french colonialists and the vietnamese communists it's as chilling as any war fiction i've seen.