What happened to Ricky Gervais?

Status
Not open for further replies.
What the hell are all these crybaby celebrities whining about? It really wasn't that bad. They say fame and riches come at a price. Who knew that the price was your sense of humor?
 
speculawyer said:
Oh man . . . he was sooooo harsh. It was funny even though it made me wince.

Ricky slicing up Hollywood:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k38cqDYqb4g

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSyIiSXcGac
I was enjoying that immensely until he mentioned LOST finale, then I panicked and shut down the tab because I'm currently on the middle of season 5. It starts at 4:20 in the first part, could someone please be kind enough to point out to me the time on the video when it's safe for me to resume right after he stops talking about LOST?
 
I think he still has it. I saw his Fame show live in manchester, it was really good. The stuff he and steve do with Karl is brilliant.

Science was really dissapointing though.
 
Letters said:
I was enjoying that immensely until he mentioned LOST finale, then I panicked and shut down the tab because I'm currently on the middle of season 5. It starts at 4:20 in the first part, could someone please be kind enough to point out to me the time on the video when it's safe for me to resume right after he stops talking about LOST?

He doesn't give away anything. Promise.
 
Letters said:
I was enjoying that immensely until he mentioned LOST finale, then I panicked and shut down the tab because I'm currently on the middle of season 5. It starts at 4:20 in the first part, could someone please be kind enough to point out to me the time on the video when it's safe for me to resume right after he stops talking about LOST?

There's not a spoiler anyway but skip ahead to 4:45 if you don't want to hear it.
 
Letters said:
I was enjoying that immensely until he mentioned LOST finale, then I panicked and shut down the tab because I'm currently on the middle of season 5. It starts at 4:20 in the first part, could someone please be kind enough to point out to me the time on the video when it's safe for me to resume right after he stops talking about LOST?
The island is all in Karl Pilkington's head.
 
He said he would never take over as the new boss on the show when Steve Carrell leaves. He never said he wouldn't make any kind of cameo or brief role.
 
Yaweee said:
He said he would never take over as the new boss on the show when Steve Carrell leaves. He never said he wouldn't make any kind of cameo or brief role.
Wasn't it just confirmed that he will indeed make a cameo?
 
Well, let's evaluate:

An Idiot Abroad: Great, but perhaps not so much because of Ricky (to the extent that Karl 'acts', I believe he acts as an exaggerated version of himself. I don't believe that Ricky or Steve write his material for him).
Guest appearances on Louie: Great.
Most recent audiobooks: Great. The Guides To on the whole have been better than the podcasts imo, although I prefer the old XFM shows when Karl had little to no celebrity status.
Science: A big step back from Fame but certainly has its moments.
Out of England II: Same. A big step back from OoE I but certainly has its moments.
Ricky Gervais Show on HBO: Sadly, I'm not a fan. I absolutely love the podcasts/audiobooks but I don't think the animations really add anything. Still glad it exists for bringing the podcasts (and Karl) to an even bigger audience.
Cemetary Junction: Not great (and probably his weakest collaboration with Merchant so far) but certainly his best film effort to date.
Hosting the Globes: Not the most brilliantly written material on paper, but as an actual 'stunt' it was nothing short of glorious.
Article in the Wall Street Journal: Brilliant and I agree with every word.

So: the podcasts/audiobooks are still on par, his films are getting better and as a provocateur he's at the top of his game with the Globes performance and WSJ piece. Only his stand-up seems to have taken a turn for the worst. We'll see if he can still write comedy when Life's Too Short airs... although I don't expect it to top The Office or Extra's (few things do, after all).

Little afraid of him reprising Brent for The Office US (even if, as he says on his blog, it's a blink-and-you'll-miss-it cameo), as that show's sensibilies are so different from the Brit version that I don't think it's a good idea to let those worlds collide. But I'm certainly looking forward to his appaerance on Curb Your Enthusiasm.

In summation: OP is wrong.
 
This is how you judge Gervais' work:

- Is Steve Merchant involved? THIS WILL BE AWESOME

- Is Steve Merchant not involved? Eh, it might be good but there's a chance it will suck.
 
Watching the Golden Globes stuff. Vicious. Redeemed in my eyes for some of his movies.

Robert Downey's tears were so good.
 
Chinner said:
i liked ricky when he was underground...now that hes mainstream? nah

What is it with people and this attitude? Anytime a band makes it big, game / movie / tv becomes popular, books, or even restaurants someone ditches it. You should be happy they're more successful.
 
In regards to Ricky at the Golden Globes:

I'm glad that Gervais just went out there and called it as he saw it.

And I do agree with Josh Tyler over at CB who said that "A good comedian holds a mirror up to society and challenges our perceptions and attitudes with humor."

There is an argument that comedy is a greater public service than any other genre of art or culture: it heals divisions, it is a balm for hurt minds, it binds social wounds, exposes real truths about how life is really led. Comedy connects.

The history of BBC comedy (of which Gervais is a proud member) in particular is almost a register of character types, a social history of the UK. Hancock, Steptoe, Mainwaring, Alf Garnett, Basil Fawlty, Baldrick, Victor Meldrew, Alan Partridge, Ali G (channel 4), David Brent, the matchlessly great General Melchett – it is much harder to list character types from serious drama who have so penetrated the consciousness of the nation and so closely defined the aspirations and failures of successive generations.

A public service broadcasting without comedy, is in danger of being regarded as no more than a dumping ground for worthiness. Seriousness is no more a guarantee of truth, insight, authenticity or probity than humour is a guarantee of superficiality and stupidity. Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly.
 
I guess no one read Flanimals (his children's book), but it's pretty good. Very creative. Recommend it to Mom and Dad GAF.
 
Mr Cola said:
So what happened? Did he just sell out and become shit?

:(

If he sold out, Golden Globes management and all the actors he dissed wouldn't have been so mad. He's always been about the uncomfortable laugh, still is from what I see.
 
Saw him perform at The Chicago Theatre a few months back. An absolute highlight. I love the man -- he is the best comedian in the world and his laugh could cure polio. It's delightful.

And anyone who has a single criticism about An Idiot Abroad has no tastes and that's a fact.
 
FlashFlooder said:
Saw him at a bar in Hell's Kitchen (NYC) a few years back. I was just kinda watching him from afar because I hate approaching celebrities (or even people I know for that matter, but I digress). Anyway, he was acting real annoyed and pissy because the waitress was taking too long to get him his check (they were super slow that day). It just kind of struck me as funny because I could see the characters he plays coming out IRL.

That's funny because in the podcast, he mentioned that to him, the ideal restaurant would have the check right with the drink/meal so he could be in and out real quick. I guess its a pet peeve of his and Steve made fun of him for it.
 
The Golden Globes clips are amazing. I have to admit that even though it was really funny, there was a bitter tone to a lot of his jokes. It's a roast when you know there's love behind the jokes, I wasn't feeling any of that during those clips.
 
I quite like his stand up and the office and extras were great but I hate his presence on an idiot abroad, it just seems pointless when him or merchant ring up and laugh for ages.

I remember Gervais having a slot on that live show at wembeley for live aid 20 or something else and he totally floundered, the next act wasn't ready and you could see the panic in his eyes and he completely bombed and had to resort to 'the dance'
 
Tkawsome said:
The Golden Globes clips are amazing. I have to admit that even though it was really funny, there was a bitter tone to a lot of his jokes. It's a roast when you know there's love behind the jokes, I wasn't feeling any of that during those clips.

It probably only comes off that way because most of the crowd reacted so coldly, but Gervais was delivering everything as he typically does. The reaction of an audience can have impact on how the viewer ultimately feels - it's why laugh tracks exist, after all.
 
Jeff Albertson said:
I quite like his stand up and the office and extras were great but I hate his presence on an idiot abroad, it just seems pointless when him or merchant ring up and laugh for ages.

I think it adds a welcome break, and serves as an introduction to the upcoming excursion.

Steve: "Nobody wants to watch you eat fucking carrots on TV!!!"

Karl: "............in HD?"

ahahaha
 
The Shadow said:
He lost weight. As science has proven before, funnyase is stored in fat cells.
avatar.jpg
 
PalaceBrother said:
I disagree. Watching Karl do his thing made it immediately apparent that it's a poorly executed act.
LOL. People have been saying this for years. It ain't true. Sorry. YES Karl exaggerates his stupidity for effect but he really is that dense.
As for Ricky, he's still a genius. The Office UK and Extras were phenomenal. The podcasts and An Idiot Abroad were too. He was the only reason the Globes were good.
 
People who get annoyed at gervais or think Karl P is a genuine idiot are just victims of the gig, you've been taken in and are now part of the ride for the rest of us. thats the whole point of their acts.

As for Karl P, he's not gonna be an idiot because you don't get like that by being stupid, you have to have a unique view of the world and an ability to tap into the mundane and harness it into comedy. So if he has a stupid thought, yes he actually thought a stupid thought, but the intelligence to be aware of it and use it to great comedic effect eclipses that.

I will say though that Gervais has a really annoying laugh, whethr he puts it on or not I dont know, only seems to employ it in some roles.

The globes this year didn't seem as funny as last year, bit sad, people seemed more offended in a bad way too. Last year they were offended but he was fresh and hit them hard and they were helpless. This year he hit them a little bit and he wasn't so fresh and he re-used some jokes and it felt a little flat for me.
 
I didn't think his bits at the Globes were all that great. Not because they were offensive or whatever, I just didn't think they were all that clever. Personally, I thought RDJ's bit when he introduced the best actress nominees was much funnier than anything Gervais said that night.
 
GoutPatrol said:
Jesus Christ. You know that he is just doing a cameo right?
Well the American Office fucking sucks now (anything after S3) so I would have hoped he would have seen how shitty it is now and moved on about his business. I still think he's great, I just think it's kind of lame for him to show up in it.
 
I don't know why Hollywood got so uptight about his Golden Globes jokes, I thought they love satire and skewering the establishment. Oh, only when its not them.

Its like when Chris Rock made a harmless joke about Jude Law during the Oscars, and Sean Penn made a huge point of praising Law once he got up there.
 
I thought Steve Carrell came off as a huge prick by pushing Ricky away.

I dont understand why everybody there was so sensitive about this. Why hire the guy when they KNOW damn well what he does? It would have been 10X worse had he just went up there and did a generic job of things rather than act like himself.

Fuckin uptight Hollywood. Whatever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom