I've seen the term "non-gamer" and "non-game" thrown around in myriad discussions lately, especially concerning the Nintendo DS: "Nintendo's strategy is marketing to non-gamers," etc. Well, I've reached my limit with the poor semantics. "Non-game" doesn't bother me TOO much, since I think it's relatively easy to define what a "game" is: A game is an activity where there are one or more clear criteria which constitute winning, some possibility of losing, and rules which the participants must follow. If something isn't a game, then it's a non-game...simple test, although it's debatable whether or not "non-game" is a useful term for understanding.
However, the notion of a "non-gamer" is really starting to bother me -- what does that term MEAN? Is a "non-gamer" someone who plays "non-games?" Is it someone who has the potential to become a "gamer"...whatever that means? Is it someone who is utterly uninterested in any KIND of game?
Part of the reason this bugs me so much is that I think human beings are, by their NATURE, "gamers." We try to turn EVERYTHING into a game, whether it ought to be or not, by defining criteria for "winning" (attractiveness of significant others, perceived social status, wealth, etc.), and seeking out competition against others. I find it hard to imagine that there is someone out there who doesn't enjoy SOME form of gaming, although it's just as easy to imagine that videogames in particular aren't for everyone.
So what do you mean when you use the term "non-gamer?" And if we find that the term is semantically meaningless, can we agree to abandon it?
However, the notion of a "non-gamer" is really starting to bother me -- what does that term MEAN? Is a "non-gamer" someone who plays "non-games?" Is it someone who has the potential to become a "gamer"...whatever that means? Is it someone who is utterly uninterested in any KIND of game?
Part of the reason this bugs me so much is that I think human beings are, by their NATURE, "gamers." We try to turn EVERYTHING into a game, whether it ought to be or not, by defining criteria for "winning" (attractiveness of significant others, perceived social status, wealth, etc.), and seeking out competition against others. I find it hard to imagine that there is someone out there who doesn't enjoy SOME form of gaming, although it's just as easy to imagine that videogames in particular aren't for everyone.
So what do you mean when you use the term "non-gamer?" And if we find that the term is semantically meaningless, can we agree to abandon it?