Nitty_Grimes
Made a crappy phPBB forum once ... once.
Christ I remember that.That happened at the time.
Christ I remember that.That happened at the time.
Ads were deliberately provocative back then to grab your attention. They were aimed to make you outraged. It lead to people talking.This one is just fucking wild no matter when, where or why lol. Imagine how many people had to go "yup, good idea!" for this to show up in print. That's the craziest part.
The big corporations came in and cleaned everything up. Now everyone is always happy all the time and everything is perfect. Yep.The 80s/90s/00s sure were different from 10s and 20s. I wonder what caused that sharp split.
Political correctness happened which lead to weak minded people offended at everything.The 80s/90s/00s sure were different from 10s and 20s. I wonder what caused that sharp split.
Women play video games and watch TV all the time in their underwear. At least that's what I was shown on the internet.This isn’t as extreme as what’s been posted. I found this Best Buy ad in a EGM from around 1997. It’s not the full add, just a clip I took because I thought she was hot.
The ad is supposed to be showing how you can shop for TV from home. I thought it was funny how the woman is in her underwear. Like women shop for TV laying in bed in underwear. Pretty blatantly pandering to the video game nerds.
Yeah but does the guy have to look like he's putting on the green instead of getting a fairway wood?Women play video games and watch TV all the time in their underwear. At least that's what I was shown on the internet.
My favorite lol
Are you actually fucking kidding me?***EDIT****
What this thread is about is more of what would be considered offensive today, not back in these days.
I found this and it inspired the thread. This wasn't offensive at the time, but given our current timeline it's now crazy to think this was an ad.
Are you actually fucking kidding me?
Man, the early 00s were just insane, I miss it dearly
Yeah, I can understand how this got greenlighted thenThat ad is from 1995. So it's not as bad as you think.
"Nothing offensive"? Get with the program son. In today's world these hyper sexualized almost naked women are the victims of the male gaze and are being used to fuel the dirty minds of those males. Unacceptable!Found the advert for the poker game I mentioned - I'm not sure if it fits the 'offensive' criteria there isn't anything offensive.
And also the full Psyco Pigs one that was posted earlier.
UK magazines in the 80s were something.
Napoleon I get it, but why french president Jacques Chirac ?
I don’t know if the thread criteria is offensive in the 90s or offensive today."Nothing offensive"? Get with the program son. In today's world these hyper sexualized almost naked women are the victims of the male gaze and are being used to fuel the dirty minds of those males. Unacceptable!
I reckon because it's an ad by Virgin Interactive and they had their HQ in the UK, so they were just taking a (pretty based) piss.Napoleon I get it, but why french president Jacques Chirac ?
Don't forget Wolf from Gladiators.Ah Maria Whittaker - one of the big 3 at the time if I recall
This is the origin story of the white villain from Disney's storybooks
My favorite lol
This one is absolutely incredible. I'm dying here laughingLove this one.
Yes, but why? It isn't even offensive. You can take offense to almost anything. This image shows a white woman dominating a black woman, in the other ads the black woman is dominating the white woman. Now some will scream racist because that's what they want to see. Me...... I see two sexy woman playing kinky bedroom games with each other and good for them.This was offensive at the time. Sony had to take it down and publicly apologise.
"Whilst the images used in the campaign were intended solely to highlight the contrast between the different colors available for the PSP, we recognize that the subject matter of one specific image may have caused concern in some countries not directly affected by the advertising," the company said in a statement. "As a result, we have now withdrawn the campaign."
Was just supposed to run in the EU I think. But this was a pretty dumb gaffe from a marketing perspective across the board I'd think.
Don't forget Wolf from Gladiators.
Internet and Social networks made minorities looks bigger than they really are.The 80s/90s/00s sure were different from 10s and 20s. I wonder what caused that sharp split.
I think you win lol.
It was already answered in a post a user replied to me in. Someone took an image out of context(it was meant to be viewed as a series of images) and used that.Yes, but why? It isn't even offensive. You can take offense to almost anything. This image shows a white woman dominating a black woman, in the other ads the black woman is dominating the white woman. Now some will scream racist because that's what they want to see. Me...... I see two sexy woman playing kinky bedroom games with each other and good for them.
Don't worry, I was saying it partially in jest, I know the trouble it causes, just thought I'd have fun with itIt was already answered in a post a user replied to me in. Someone took an image out of context(it was meant to be viewed as a series of images) and used that.
Basically, you want to avoid that shit as much as possible when you're in advertising, because it can and does happen quite a bit. You risk your firm's reputation as well as your client, not to mention any money lost from it.
You also want to avoid stuff like the bolded as well depending on the client and message involved. That's why I said it was a bad marketing campaign overall.