• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Why don't helicopters have parachutes?

Mister Apoc

Demigod of Troll Threads
for passangers to use in case they have to bail, this whole kobe thing could of been avoided


seriosuly why havn't aviation officials added emergency parachutes in helicopters
 
I know they have tested airbags for helicopter crashes, but not sure what the end result was.
 
the BlackBox is always fine, why don't they just make a giant one that people can climb into in case of emergencies.

It's a conspiracy by the greeting card companies who need accidents to fund the months where there are no special occasions.
 
There are helicopters with ejection seats and parachute systems but they are usually combat helicopters like the Russian KA-50 or the prototype Comanche helicopters. The blades usually shoot off or remove themselves prior to the ejection mechanism engaging.

These systems are very expensive and civil helicopters don't usually come into heavy combat and so are not worth outfitting.

The SAS actually use a Sikorsky very similar to the one Kobe used, it's very rare for them to have any problems.
 
Last edited:
There are helicopters with ejection seats and parachute systems but they are usually combat helicopters like the Russian KA-50 or the prototype Comanche helicopters. The blades usually shoot off or remove themselves prior to the ejection mechanism engaging.

These systems are very expensive and civil helicopters don't usually come into heavy combat and so are not worth outfitting.

The SAS actually use a Sikorsky very similar to the one Kobe used, it's very rare for them to have any problems.
Have these been ever live tested? I only heard about it in theory but never saw it for real.
 
People base jump off buildings with chutes don't they? Seems like something would be better than nothing.

But the building doesn't have spinning blades on a helicopter that is losing altitude. If the helicopter was locked in at an altitude and not falling it probably would be fine.
 
Allow me to demonstrate why with a handy dandy gif.

xnndVAq.gif


Hope that clears up any questions you might have OP.
 
Have these been ever live tested? I only heard about it in theory but never saw it for real.
As it is a Russian helicopter the success / failure rate is probably not available. It does at least give you a chance to escape an otherwise certainly lethal situation.
Russian helicopter engineering is also excellent in my opinion, it is the operational software, sensors and systems that they fall behind.
 
You would still need to choose between be burned to death in the wreckage, smashed against the floor in a freefall from 500 meters or being cut to pieces by the propeller blades.
 
Googled 'parachute opening height':Most main parachutes take 600 to 1200 feet of free fall to open. The reserve parachute can open in less than 400 feet. The reserve absolute minimum would be around 700 feet to land without injury.

Googled 'helicopter height restrictions: 500 feet to any person, structure, vehicle or vessel at minimum.

So yeah, jumping out of an helicopter with a parachute is likely to end in the same result as staying in the helicopter
 
Last edited:
Hollywood. Lol.

Just jump out and dive roll when you hit the ground. If you're a good guy you'll live. If you're a bad guy you'll be skewered on a fence or flagpole.

Dude this is reality. Physics and human error are at play here.
 
Can't really parachute your ass out of slamming into the side of a mountain because the pilot didn't see it.

PS I highly recommended sky diving at dusk on a warm summer night that shit was magical
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just using common sense

Helicopters - Obviously the rotors
Airplanes - People aren't trained to use it correctly, sucked into engines, expensive.

Aircrafts are designed to be very safe, we like to have the probability of any event happening remain at 1E-9 or lower. Most crashes are caused by pilot error and you will not know something is wrong unless they tell you. Things like engine fire and such are recoverable events, an aircraft can fly with one engine and can glide with no engines. So the chances of the pilot going through all the instructions to recover the aircraft then failing (which is extremely improbable) then going onto notify the passengers to get their parachutes on and use it correctly that is impossible to control in a high stress situation.


And to be completely honest, it will be way too expensive.
 
I mean, from what I read they were going 184mph when the helicopter impacted. They would've had no time to react at all once they realized what was happening. Sometimes there's just no escaping death.
 
Who said that: But based on transported people and amount of crashes, Helicopters definitely rule.
I was joking :messenger_tears_of_joy:
But yeah, I don't have specific stats on it but the odds of ever dying in a plane crash are so low that I can't see helicopters being statistically safer.
 
Last edited:
I was joking :messenger_tears_of_joy:
But yeah, I don't have specific stats on it but the odds of ever dying in a plane crash are so low that I can't see helicopters being statistically safer.
They are not, but smaller aircraft are statistically not that great when it comes to safety.
 
I don't understand how you could read the details of the Kobe Byrant crash and think "yeah, parachutes would have helped". They literally had no idea the mountain was there and rammed into it rotor first. It's like asking why the occupants of a deadly head-on collision didn't just get out of their cars.
 
Last edited:
Even if you had a parachute, where could you safely land?

The wind could slam you into a building or you could land right in front of oncoming traffic.

Your best bet would be landing in a forest but then your parachute could get stuck in the trees?
 
Last edited:
Helicopters travel at much lower altitudes than regular aircraft, not to mention there's a safety hazard with those spinning rotors. Kobe and those people on board weren't going to make it either way.
 
Helicopters travel at much lower altitudes than regular aircraft, not to mention there's a safety hazard with those spinning rotors. Kobe and those people on board weren't going to make it either way.
Atleast, with the forces involved in hitting a mountain at 150MPH, it's likely there was little more than a split second of sheer terror before the end and they didn't suffer...much...
 
Top Bottom