Would I be wrong in saying the Final Fantasy is kinda falling into obscurity?
I'll tell you how, it's a sub based mmo, and it's square enix. Should still be F2P in some capacity.I'm looking forward to how the Wii U version turns out.
Okay.. I found the thread and skimmed it. In development since 2006?! That's worse than Pikmin 3!
when square gets their heads out of their asseswhen is vs coming out anyway?
But that's why, it's being ported from the Wii U to the PS3!It would be megaton big only because it's likely never gonna happen. They're having enough trouble getting it finished for PS3, a port would be laughable lol.
Also development of the game didn't pick up until a while ago, hasn't really been in "development" as we know it since 2006.
not really, full development didn't really start until ff13 was out I think. Something like that.But that's why, it's being ported from the Wii U to the PS3!
Seriously though, has it been in development since 06?
Realistically they should go f2p with an ingame store for DQX.
I'll tell you how, it's a sub based mmo, and it's square enix. Should still be F2P in some capacity.
Oh, thanks for the answer.not really, full development didn't really start until ff13 was out I think. Something like that.
It would be megaton big only because it's likely never gonna happen. They're having enough trouble getting it finished for PS3, a port would be laughable lol.
Also development of the game didn't pick up until a while ago, hasn't really been in "development" as we know it since 2006.
All will be known at E3!
I can see people playing the mmo but I just can't it see it sustaining a large population for any sort of lengthy duration.I still wonder how this will work in a console environment where the hardware provider gets a piece of the action. I'm not familiar with F2P enough to properly comment on it, but with GRO heading to Wii U I do wonder how that would translate to consoles. I've seen it suggested that they would just take all the content and sell it like a normal game, but considering the idea of F2P I'm still not comfortable with that type of conversion being applicable/suitable. But Nintendo would have to make their money somehow and I don't know how feasible getting a portion of the separate purchases would be.
As for how they make money. I think they should charge for the game, but once you own the game it's F2P. So the split can still happen at that level. And then if they want they can decide a way to split overall profits from in game purchases or whatever.
It would be megaton big only because it's likely never gonna happen. They're having enough trouble getting it finished for PS3, a port would be laughable lol.
Also development of the game didn't pick up until a while ago, hasn't really been in "development" as we know it since 2006.
Depends on how much free content there is in the game, but if it were possible to beat some sort of single player campaign from beginning to end without grinding a shitton and without having to pay anything, then go ahead and charge 59.99. I don't see a problem with that. But yeah if there isn't that type of content then just charge some sort of entry fee.Like selling the game for $15-$20 to cover Nintendo and retailers and then the 3rd party makes their money from the other purchases?
because it's in development hell, so not only releasing it on one console but miraculously having it ready for another would be omgwtffffHow exactly would it be a megaton?
Does Valve/Steam get a cut from f2p games that are on Steam?I still wonder how this will work in a console environment where the hardware provider gets a piece of the action. I'm not familiar with F2P enough to properly comment on it, but with GRO heading to Wii U I do wonder how that would translate to consoles. I've seen it suggested that they would just take all the content and sell it like a normal game, but considering the idea of F2P I'm still not comfortable with that type of conversion being applicable/suitable. But Nintendo would have to make their money somehow and I don't know how feasible getting a portion of the separate purchases would be.
because it's in development hell, so not only releasing it on one console but miraculously having it ready for another would be omgwtffff
Depends on how much free content there is in the game, but if it were possible to beat some sort of single player campaign from beginning to end without grinding a shitton and without having to pay anything, then go ahead and charge 59.99. I don't see a problem with that. But yeah if there isn't that type of content then just charge some sort of entry fee.
It all depends on what way the content is built, but the F2P model can work as long as the game is designed to take advantage of it. I played LOTRO for free for countless hours. Eventually I reached a point where where I could grind my way through or pay, I just paid lol. I figured I already got WAYYY more than enough value without putting in any cash, so it was an easy investment.
That's what the F2P model is all about. Instead of paying up front, you put out a great product, tons of content, and people will pay you later....LOTS of people if it's free.
But if they're worried then yeah, release it at retail at whatever price whether 15-20 or full price, and use that as insurance just in case lots of people don't end up paying.
I just feel like they could make so much more money that way. But of course square isn't a company on the up and up when it comes to the latest trends.
Does Valve/Steam get a cut from f2p games that are on Steam?
there you have it. Also you have to figure that a lot of young people play DQ, young people are like free money in f2p games. Look at maple story (though that does appeal to some older people as well).Seems like a good example of what you are talking about it in this thread.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=466443
I have no idea.
i need that cake for my birthdaywhich is today
From the Versus XIII thread.
It's coming to Wii U. You can tell from the wording. Nomura is going to come on stage to announce it.
I'm officially adding it to The List :
-throws tumbleweed-
Here's an idea. Nintendo should do a one-off and put Gary Busey as temp Creative Director of Retro with a $50-$80 mil budget and total freedom. That's a new IP I'd like to see! Just imagine the priceless lines and pure creativity/insanity.
And then, put Meat Loaf as the head of Kyoto EAD Zelda team in the same position and same budget.
Then, make it a competition between the two and you videotape the behind-the-scenes of it all, and put "making of clips" up every week on Nintendo.com, priceless stuff would be there I assure you and would keep us entertained throughout. Imagine the hilarity of Meat Loaf breaking down and going off on the Jap team because he doesn't understand the language and him and Busey throwing classic verbiage out every week. It would be a phenomena!
Then have Kondo and Yamamoto score it all. A new world of Nintendo gifs would be upon us.
Wait, the horrible singer?
thread is taking a turn for the desperate![]()
This thread moves too fast for me :s
so sad that he's permabanned
so sad that he's permabanned
I know. His mood swings were pretty entertaining and he seemed like a nice guy in general.
I remember someone saying he would be back for E3?
Wii U Speculation Thread 4: 2 Fast 2 FuriousThis thread moves too fast for me :s
hmm, I could totally imagine a new StarTropics as a 3D Action Adventure of sorts, to fill the Tomb Raider / Uncharted gap of Nintendo's portfolio.
Then again, I could totally imagine a lot of things.
From the Versus XIII thread.
It's coming to Wii U. You can tell from the wording. Nomura is going to come on stage to announce it.
I'm officially adding it to The List™ :
I called Dragon Quest X going to WiiU when GAF's Dragon Quest Defense Force said that we'd fly into the SUN before we ever saw a Dragon Quest on an unproven platform.
And I'm going to call something else... FFVersusXIII is going to come to WiiU, and it will revive interest in the series. Coupled with use of Luminous Engine and a shortening of the production cycle, the series will come back from the dead.
Calling it.
I'm not even waiting for a confirmation. Between Nomura's statement, Square Enix saying they're considering FF for WiiU at last E3 and the sheer timing of development kicking back into gear? It's a tough amount of information to ignore. As far as I'm concerned, this one is "nothin' but net".
You should be able to see if a member is permabanned, like on Something Awful.