NullPointer
Member
It's animals, not other people.

It's animals, not other people.
The big problem is people consuming long form meat (like Beef or Tuna) where in the growth period of the animal is substantial in terms of the resources it consumes to reach maturity versus short form like chicken, which mature rapidly and don't consume massive amounts of resources.
I wouldn't eat that if you paid me.
![]()
That's the only way I would consider eating a steak.
Even if humans found a way to create meat in a lab, the animals would most likely die off anyway. Dairy cows would be kept for milk, but the space used to rear cattle and pigs for meat would be used to grow crops etc instead. Those little piggies ain't gunna have anywhere to live
Pigs make pretty good pets. They're smart animals, but a certain level of obstinance comes with that intelligence. You have to keep them entertained or they will make their own entertainment. They will open refrigerators and eat what they can. They will open cabinets and eat all that shit. They can also have dominance issues, and will attempt to dominate humans and other animals if they aren't socialized and taught that the humans are "top pig" (no shit). You can train them quite easily to respond to commands, to fetch, and to walk on a leash. Basically think of them like a bulldog that isn't an incredible dumbass.It really annoys me that we'd still have a use for all our other meat species, but pigs are just screwed.
Our teeth mostly resemble that of gorilla
Our digestive system struggles with meat
We weren't designed to consume meat, we just choose to do it (sometimes have to for survival especially in freezing climates)
Just because we can process the food doesn't mean we were designed for it, they even feed pigs meat these days
Wat?
Yeah, this is a thing that the "meat is mean" folks don't quite grasp. We aren't gonna keep those things around or let 'em loose. What the hell is a "feral cow" or "feral chicken" gonna do? We domesticated them over thousands of years, and they don't flip that switch and become independent of us any more than a puppy would. Some animals can make that jump (pigs, goats), but a lot cannot, and even if they do they become pests (pigs). At best, you just stop letting them breed and feed them until they all die off, and that assumes that people are going to be willing to feed something that no longer has any economic benefit. Pigs make decent pets, but cows and chickens leave a lot to be desired. The most likely scenario is that we go out and kill them all to the last hoof rather than watch them starve. So, I guess they're saved in that there's no more of them except what's in zoos and preserves. Yay PETA.
Pigs make pretty good pets. They're smart animals, but a certain level of obstinance comes with that intelligence. You have to keep them entertained or they will make their own entertainment. They will open refrigerators and eat what they can. They will open cabinets and eat all that shit. They can also have dominance issues, and will attempt to dominate humans and other animals if they aren't socialized and taught that the humans are "top pig" (no shit). You can train them quite easily to respond to commands, to fetch, and to walk on a leash. Basically think of them like a bulldog that isn't an incredible dumbass.
Sorry, this is just black and white to the extreme. Worldwide meat consumption will have doubled in 2050.Exactly this, too. I do wonder if many anti-meat eaters realize that they are arguing for the extinction of domesticated livestock.
I'm going to go out on a limb and predict we'll come up with an alternative to this supposed binary dilemma whereupon factory farming and extinction are the only two choices.Exactly this, too. I do wonder if many anti-meat eaters realize that they are arguing for the extinction of domesticated livestock.
Sorry, this is just black and white to the extreme. Worldwide meat consumption will have doubled in 2050.
We're as far from the extinction of cows and pigs as from reaching another solar system.
I'm going to go out on a limb and predict we'll come up with an alternative to this supposed binary dilemma whereupon factory farming and extinction are the only two choices.
And then you point out how siimilar our DNA is and that argument fades away. 3% or w/e difference is a huuuuuuuge difference.
I think it's pretty well supported that our heavy meat diet supported our evolution to the humans we are today.Isnt there a direct correlation between animal protein consumption and human brain development?
Isnt there a direct correlation between animal protein consumption and human brain development?
Isnt there a direct correlation between animal protein consumption and human brain development?
Nothing's wrong with it to me, we're the top of the food chain. Look at these babies I made recently:
I would say that viruses still prey on us... I hope we'll get these fuckers soon too.
Yes and not only that, we don't eat it responsibly.
Meat consumption averages 107 pounds per year.
![]()
Just imagine all the meat you eat in one life on one pile...
More info here:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2012/06/27/155527365/visualizing-a-nation-of-meat-eaters
Yep, we wouldn't be where we are today.
And Vegans still require B12, or they would have nervous system damage.
They get it through supplements.
Where do you think B12 is extracted from?
Yes and not only that, we don't eat it responsibly.
This chart is pretty crazy, What It Takes To Make A Quarter-Pound Hamburger:
![]()
Meat consumption averages 107 pounds per year.
![]()
Just imagine all the meat you eat in one life on one pile...
More info here:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2012/06/27/155527365/visualizing-a-nation-of-meat-eaters
Kind of interesting to see where Luxenbourg and Australia ended up being....
Yes, that would be the first step. I don't really see that happening though, unless there's pressure from the state at some point. Most people (in this thread) don't even consider sustainability, so there's that...The more important and realistic goal IMO is to reform factory farming practices, for both moral and sustainability ends.
I kill the meat I eat, or I will purchase it from free range, grass fed local farms.
You can too.
I've read that some vegans actually do okay without the B12 supplements, because they can potentially get it from eating leafy vegetables. Why's that? Because of the insect wing and leg particulates which are never *completely* washed from the folds of said veggies. Could be bullshit, but a funny thought either way.
I think it's pretty well supported that our heavy meat diet supported our evolution to the humans we are today.
Yep, we wouldn't be where we are today.
And Vegans still require B12, or they would have nervous system damage.
(Some probably do, cause they didn't research their ethical diet)
They get it through supplements.
Where do you think B12 is extracted from?
That's why vegans are so dumb!
I think I've heard something like that before, but never bookmarked the paper/study. I don't need scientific rationalization to enjoy meat.
Yep, we wouldn't be where we are today.
And Vegans still require B12, or they would have nervous system damage.
(Some probably do, cause they didn't research their ethical diet)
They get it through supplements.
Where do you think B12 is extracted from?
Isn't vitamin d deficiency also an issue for vegetarians/vegans?
B12 supplements are largely made from modified yeast, at least it was last time I checked.
Meat gave our ancestors the sustinance needed for us to evolve and develop the society we live in today. Now thanks to worldwide trade you have a constant supply of vegetables that come from different parts of the world different times of the year to ensure that you have food to eat. Basically humanity and society exist currently as it is because of meat.
Living on supplements is not a way for most people to live though.
As it's not cost effective.
It's a 1st world thing.
I was considering being a vegan at one point, but I researched it as much as I could.
Didn't want to harm my body because of a poor diet.
That's a pretty decent analogy.Your argument seems as valid to me as it would be to argue for oil instead of working for alternative energy resources (preferably working and efficient such, then) because we've used it to achieve some great things, pollution aside.
They also ate raw meat which we moved past. But that's not the point. The point is that nothing you write in this paragraph in any way, shape or form argues why we should eat meat now when there's options that gives us as much sustenance, especially if you start discussing ethics. Of course we're only talking about people who have the option to do so without. Your argument seems as valid to me as it would be to argue for oil instead of working for alternative energy resources (preferably working and efficient such, then) because we've used it to achieve some great things, pollution aside.
I entirely disagree that you'd harm your body being vegan. While the cost might be a more valid point (I'm not sure, I've never researched the cost), a vegan diet with proper supplements is entirely healthy and sustainable.
That's why vegans are so dumb!
I meant it that, if I didn't do the research, I'd harm myself by doing the diet improperly, like a lot of vegans do.
(Some people just jump in, not knowing how to do it properly)
You do get it more in non-vegan food.
But some fruits an veggies contain it.
Which can then be extracted and put into supplements.
Living on supplements is not a way for most people to live though.
As it's not cost effective.
It's a 1st world thing.
I was considering being a vegan at one point, but I researched it as much as I could.
Didn't want to harm my body because of a poor diet.
The one diet I'd probably go down to is Pescatarian.
Seems pretty well balanced and more sustainable.
I put that in a post above. (marmite)
That's not meat. 😉How bout that though
![]()
i love eating meat and i don't think its wrong in any way, the strong kills the weak, this also applies to wild animals. so why we should be any different?
That's not meat. 😉