• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Will you be buying an Xbox 2?

Phoenix said:
If its cheaper than getting a good videocard for my PC - absolutely.

Ding ding ding. We have a winnah! With the inclusion of standard USB 2.0 ports,
I'm hoping MS markets a keyboard and mouse and I won't have to upgrade
my PC for quite a while. :) (Got my iBook for general computing stuff anyway).
 
Yes. "When" is the issue for me (same w/ PS3).

I'll most likely get it when T2 releases MLB 2k6. If ES4: Oblivion is out around the same time as MLB, it's probably 100% that I'll get it then.
 
oh yeah. I'll be there on launch, or earlier if i can find anyone selling it before official release date.

I already have $900 saved for Xbox2 launch. I plan to buy all the good launch games.
 
Hmm...tough call. Probably not. I'm working 50 hours a week now and I really don't have time for one, especially right when it launches. I'll wait until it gets hacked. I only started playing my xbox once I modded it, and I bought that at launch.
 
If I have mucho $$$$ and Xenon has a lot of cool games and features then YES. Otherwise I' wont. I'll stay with PS3 and Revolution(unless revolution turns out to be crap).
 
I'm probably going to go with one console next gen (with no older consoles taking up space). It'd be great to have a back catalogue during the dry post-launch period; backwards compatibility would be awesome. Right now, that limits my choices to PS3 and Revolution. I'm still waiting to see if they'll include the bonus in Xenon. If they do I might buy one just because it's out a year earlier and I may not be able to resist it if there's some great software. Right now I'm not too interested in the lineup, which AFAIK consists of typical EA stuff and the obvious MS sequels.
 
Not until I start seeing some games worth talking about. Right now it sounds like a lot of PC ports and current generation ports, along with whatever Microsoft's developers have ready.

There's a lot coming out this year on systems I already own, and two new handhelds to think about, so Xbox 2 or whatever it's called will need to have a killer lineup for me to buy it near launch.
 
I leaning towards it but I need more specifics. Stronger JP support and backwards compatibity would go a long way towards securing it though.
 
MmmBeef said:
Ding ding ding. We have a winnah! With the inclusion of standard USB 2.0 ports, I'm hoping MS markets a keyboard and mouse and I won't have to upgrade
my PC for quite a while. :) (Got my iBook for general computing stuff anyway).

:(

So this is the mentality? So you all do not have to buy a computer?

Way to go to kill the PC games industry MS! And fuck you for killing Tex Murphy! :(
 
element said:
I'll be getting it day one as well.

I feel all of you who will take the plunge the first day.
I see your either eager to get to the next generation of games or a real Xbox fan.
Me on the other hand, I haven't been able to put enough time into games but constantly blow money on them because of a combination of GA hype but really just a strong self interest in the games.

For example a true classic in the making Fight Night Round 2 doesn't get enough attention.
Fight Night played like a dream and looked great. The character Models in Round 2 look more true to life then any game this gen. I'm not asking for silent hill pictures either.

The point is I'm content with what I have.
The hype of the next gen from the new Xbox won't matter to me.
I will endure what you will call obsolete like a Sony or Nintendo Fan Boy.

This is wise on my part because I will save money and be welcomed by an already established library of games.
Most likely at a cheaper price.

But if you have money to burn and time on your hands I think its normal to jump at it. I love getting a system at launch. If it has problems later so what take it to walmart for an exhange.

I want a High Definition TV before I go next gen also. I'm talking a gigantic one!

element said:
HAHA. There will be a lot more stuff then Godfather.

I know there will be more than The Godfather but I have a feeling this game will turn out excellent.

element said:
I still don't understand this logic. PS3 was in development stages well before Xenon. PS3 will probably be officially announced before Xenon.
Also we have NO idea what will be in Revolution. For all we know, they could make it less powerful then PS3 or Xenon, because they have stated that the returns on graphics aren't worth it anymore and great gameplay can be done on any hardware.

By that logic with Xenon steady approaching it must have been in development a whole year before ps3. If its out to market first it is complete. The competition can always build better after something is finalized. Nintendo may have a behind the times way of thinking however they realise graphics are important. The GC is more powerful that Ps2 right. That alone shows the logic that a year makes a difference.

Its all about mass market Microsoft needs the head start to shake things up.
In America historically sometimes the first to jump captures a period in time.
Genesis did damned good because of it's lead on the more powerful Super Nintendo.
It just needs the right games at the right price.
But the Fact the latest will always be the greatest technically.
 
I'll be definitely getting both an Xbox 2 and a PS3 on day one. Revolution will have to convince me first before I take the plunge.
 
It'll probably be like the first Xbox was for me... wait a while and then get it when there are a couple interesting games for it. So far, there's not really too much that's been announced that stirs my interest.
 
The only reason I have an XBox now is because of my ridiculous - some would categorize it as clinically insane - love for all things Outrun.

If the Xbox 2's library bears any resemblance to what came out this generation, forget it. I can't stand shooters, and the selection of games for the XBox 1 skews heavily, heavily towards that genre.

PS3 is a definite purchase, possibly launch. I'm waiting to see what Nintendo's doing with the Revolution before I decide on that.
 
Hell no, i'm content with what i have now. A PS1 thank you very much. So as soon as the PS3 comes out, i'm marching down to the store and picking up a PS2.

I guess i don't have the money or time to get into that 128 bit "craze" alot of yall seem to be into. You see, i still havn't been able to play all of the great PS1 games yet. Also, when the PS3 comes out there should be a pretty good selection of games by then for the PS2. Plus they will probably lower the price.

But who knows, i may get caught up in the hype like everyone else and break down and buy an Xbox 360 early in 2012.
 
probably, but definitely not at launch. ill wait till they price drop and start bundling 2 or more games with the machine. learned my lesson after this gen.
 
I dont understand how anyone has made their minds up yet, we dont know squat about what GAMES any of the consoles will have.

To choose a next gen console based SOLEY on how you liked the companies previous console just reeks of fanboy bias.
 
Warm Machine said:
Did MS have a Tex Murphy game in development?

I'd imagine that Tex Murphy was as good as dead when Microsoft bought Access. At least, that's what my gut told me when it happened.

(Not that I really liked UaKM, but it was still good. I'm more upset at the stillborn that was The 11th Hour.)
 
Most deffinitely. I enjoyed my Xbox a great deal and I'm ready for next gen. I would have bought whoever launched first regardless.
 
We'll see. Not at launch, but once all consoles are pretty much known quantities in terms of hardware, features, and early games I'll make a decision on my next generation console. Going to be wierd having both a PS2 and Xbox to trade in/sell off towards it though. Funny, I'd never have thought of selling my consoles for the next version until this generation, when I finally bought multiple systems.
 
Any1 said:
Hell no, i'm content with what i have now. A PS1 thank you very much. So as soon as the PS3 comes out, i'm marching down to the store and picking up a PS2.

I guess i don't have the money or time to get into that 128 bit "craze" alot of yall seem to be into. You see, i still havn't been able to play all of the great PS1 games yet. Also, when the PS3 comes out there should be a pretty good selection of games by then for the PS2. Plus they will probably lower the price.

But who knows, i may get caught up in the hype like everyone else and break down and buy an Xbox 360 early in 2012.

Out of curiosity, are you a sports gamer?

The nice thing about more powerful hardware is it brings a new level of realism to sports games. The jump from Madden on Psone to Madden on PS2 is huge. If you are still playing Madden 2005 on PSone I feel for ya bro! :D
 
xsarien said:
I'd imagine that Tex Murphy was as good as dead when Microsoft bought Access. At least, that's what my gut told me when it happened.

(Not that I really liked UaKM, but it was still good. I'm more upset at the stillborn that was The 11th Hour.)

There were two Tex Murphy games in development, and then Microsoft bought Access Software solely to secure the rights for their Links golf game License. Previous Microsoft games used their engine, then Microsoft tried on it's own and falled flat on it's face, so they bought their competition for penny stock I guess. Access Software became Microsoft Utah, and/or Indie Games (they made the Amped games and continued the Links games). Then lately, it was sold to Take Two Interactive.

Chris Jones and the other head honcho at Indie tried hard as they could to convince MS to produce another Tex Murphy game, and then they tried various subprojects to show them there was a potential. Microsoft never listened. I remember following the projects on the Unnoficial Tex Murphy boards, they all got the axe one after another (there was to be a flash series of adventure games at some point). They really cared about their old fans: they tried to get a novel made if I recall correctly, and they put up radio shows as MP3s to tell what happened after the cliffhanger ending in Tex Murphy Overseer.

There are CSI games on Xbox, why can't there be a Tex Murphy game also? Damn TV shows licences. Take Two, are you listening? We want that also on Xbox 2! ;)
 
Jotaro said:
:(

So this is the mentality? So you all do not have to buy a computer?

Way to go to kill the PC games industry MS! And fuck you for killing Tex Murphy! :(

Fuck the PC. If it isn't going to give us what we want - let it die. If it can't deliver reliable trouble free games, then maybe doesn't need to stick around.

Don't get me wrong, I have PC games that I like, but they are few and far between now compared to my consoles.
 
Dr_Cogent said:
Fuck the PC. If it isn't going to give us what we want - let it die. If it can't deliver reliable trouble free games, then maybe doesn't need to stick around.

Don't get me wrong, I have PC games that I like, but they are few and far between now compared to my consoles.

My consoles don't give me what I want, and there are definitely consoles games that I like. Should I let them die?
 
goomba said:
I dont understand how anyone has made their minds up yet, we dont know squat about what GAMES any of the consoles will have.

To choose a next gen console based SOLEY on how you liked the companies previous console just reeks of fanboy bias.

No it actually doesn't. I know what I want and I am getting it.

MS's online is second to none, and I sincerely doubt they are going to lose that lead next round.

I need my Nintendo games, Miyamoto is why I buy Nintendo systems. I hope that man lives a very very long time.

Sony, well - Sony can bite me this next round.
 
I will NOT be an early adopter. I am going to enjoy what PS2 and Xbox is going to offer for 2005 (Tekken 5, GT4, Dynasty Warriors 5, Splinter Cell Chaos Theory, Fight Night Round 2, MX vs ATV, God of War, etc) and into 2006. Once the PS3 and the Revolution launches then I will take a look at all 3 systems and decide which one offers the games that I like.

I will say this though, Microsoft had BETTER get their shit in gear regarding Japanese support. Tecmo cannot do it alone and I have been extremely disappointed in the fact that Xbox sees very few Japanese titles. The ones they do see usually have already been out on PS2 for quite a while. If PS3 launches and we start seeing crap like 6 month to one year exclusives on Metal Gear, Dynasty Warriors, Grand Theft Auto, etc. I will drop MS like a bad habit.
 
Dr_Cogent said:
MS's online is second to none, and I sincerely doubt they are going to lose that lead next round.

Microsoft onlice services' are also second to none in terms of money, which I am 100% sure they are going to lose like mad in the next round, a round that they might very well lose :lol

With PCs, save for some MMORPGs, there are virtually no games where the region you are from in order to play online is an issue. And it's been done before any other platform, it's tried and true.

Dr_Cogent said:
I need my Nintendo games, Miyamoto is why I buy Nintendo systems. I hope that man lives a very very long time.

Ditto. As long as Nintendo will make games, I will buy the systems that allow me to play them. But, I will do so with my beloved PC games properties that for various reasons just cannot be done properly on consoles. Understand my mindset?

Dr_Cogent said:
Sony, well - Sony can bite me this next round.

They have far more games that I will want I am sure, so they can bite my wallet this next round. ;)
 
Jotaro said:
My consoles don't give me what I want, and there are definitely consoles games that I like. Should I let them die?

I keep hearing from so many people that they are fed up with dealing with the expense of the PC and it's unreliability.

All the consoles really need is some sort of controller that eclipses the keyboard/mouse. Mind controlled devices would be nice, but I think that's quite a bit a ways off. I sure hope I see that in my lifetime [if we don't blow ourselves up that is].

The PC is nice, for work. I really don't care to have to type anyway. Voice is the wave of the future in gaming. How much slower is it to have to type a message than just to say it?

I am more comfortable in my Lazyboy rocking chair than sitting at my desk (which is quite comfortable itself with the configuration and chair I have).

I'm not saying you shouldn't have the games you want. The PC is just a mega freakin expensive and unreliable (compared to consoles) device for gaming. I could be wrong, but I don't see it living forever. Look at MS. They got into the Xbox because they know where the future is headed and it's headed to the living room.
 
I think Ill wait until its been out for a little while then post a thread titled , "GAF convince me to buy an Xbox 360"

but seriously I will most likey buy one at launch but it depends how many games will be available at launch.

I dont understand how anyone has made their minds up yet, we dont know squat about what GAMES any of the consoles will have.

To choose a next gen console based SOLEY on how you liked the companies previous console just reeks of fanboy bias.

I think its more a matter of an early adopter mentality. new tech is always fun to get ASAP even if you have no practical use for it.
 
Rob said:
I will NOT be an early adopter. I am going to enjoy what PS2 and Xbox is going to offer for 2005 (Tekken 5, GT4, Dynasty Warriors 5, Splinter Cell Chaos Theory, Fight Night Round 2, MX vs ATV, God of War, etc) and into 2006. Once the PS3 and the Revolution launches then I will take a look at all 3 systems and decide which one offers the games that I like.

I will say this though, Microsoft had BETTER get their shit in gear regarding Japanese support. Tecmo cannot do it alone and I have been extremely disappointed in the fact that Xbox sees very few Japanese titles. The ones they do see usually have already been out on PS2 for quite a while. If PS3 launches and we start seeing crap like 6 month to one year exclusives on Metal Gear, Dynasty Warriors, Grand Theft Auto, etc. I will drop MS like a bad habit.


You might as well wait a PS3 then. All three of these series you like will most likely debut on PS3 first. Don't forget about Koei's new series Oni which will debut at PS3 launch! :D

Since we are extending this out to other consoles I'll get a PS3 at launch and will more than likely skip the Revolution until it is $99 or less. Maybe all together.
 
Im gonna wait and see how publishers release their games on the Pal Xbox.

EA and Sega/Take 2 have done a pathetic job taking out the online components for our market.

Ill be supporting NTSC if this doesnt change so ill be watching for a while.

Its like the 50/60hz issue all over again.
 
methodman said:
Will you guys be buying the new xbox 2, or whatever it is called, or will you just wait for the next consoles to come out? I didn't buy an Xbox this year because I didn't think Xbox live would be as great as it is (I am borrowing my cousins Xbox, he never plays at all). Just for Xbox Live on the next console and all those games that Microsoft is pushing to be online only (specifically the sports titles) I will be buying this. It seems like Microsoft is going to be stepping up the standard on its consoles.

I plan to, but if a lot of titles are online only then I may have second thoughts. I don't mind online games but I sure as hell don't want all my games to be online (too many idiots playing these games ruin it for others).
 
Dr_Cogent said:
I keep hearing from so many people that they are fed up with dealing with the expense of the PC and it's unreliability.

So do I!

Dr_Cogent said:
All the consoles really need is some sort of controller that eclipses the keyboard/mouse. Mind controlled devices would be nice, but I think that's quite a bit a ways off. I sure hope I see that in my lifetime [if we don't blow ourselves up that is].


Sure you want a mouse included with every Xbox 3, so you can play on the comfort of your couch. That just does not works. PC games that require a mind controlled device? Apart from such games as Master of Orion 3, I can't think of any. ;)


Dr_Cogent said:
The PC is nice, for work. I really don't care to have to type anyway. Voice is the wave of the future in gaming. How much slower is it to have to type a message than just to say it?

Some games require, and will always require a keyboard dude. Some people do not like to deal with foul-mouthed 12 years-old boys. And some people don't have lungs big enoughs for their gaming ways. ;)

Dr_Cogent said:
I am more comfortable in my Lazyboy rocking chair than sitting at my desk (which is quite comfortable itself with the configuration and chair I have)

Being comfortable on a Layzboy the way you tell it does not compute with using a mouse. ;)

Dr_Cogent said:
I'm not saying you shouldn't have the games you want. The PC is just a mega freakin expensive and unreliable (compared to consoles) device for gaming. I could be wrong, but I don't see it living forever. Look at MS. They got into the Xbox because they know where the future is headed and it's headed to the living room.

It's mega freaking expensive and unreliable compared to consoles like you say, but they have advantages consoles will never be able to nail! But hey, there are cheap alternatives, you don't have to buy a 500 dollars every six months to play the latest FPS without stuttering. Oh and there is stuttering, but you actually get higher definitions! Sure you can get that on consoles with HDTV, but for some reason I'm not sure it's gonna be used to the fullest by that much games, what's the percentage of gamers that use an s-video cable? I guess it is lesser, or a least similar, than the percentage of gamers who use an RF cable. But you get my point I guess: most average joes who buy consoles like things simple on consoles and will get the cables it comes with, or a cheap adapter to play it on their old TV.

The amount of people who buy expensive HDTVs, and use the composite cables that come with their DVD player, is mind-bobbling. At least Best Buy zealots help counter that a bit. ;)

PC gaming is gonna live forever, but there's been a huge drop in quality because of the consoles. WW2 and Vietnam FPSes, anyone? But it's gonna also live forever, simply for the reason that some markets do not have consoles, and you don't have to get some big company's approval to release your game, as long as you have retail connexions. But then, there's the Internet where you could download games.

And as a console gamer, would you really settle with owning games that you paid and downloaded? ;)
 
By that logic with Xenon steady approaching it must have been in development a whole year before ps3
Why do you say 'year'? If anything the window between the two systems will be 6 months, with both systems coming out within 6 months or less of each other. Xenon launch in the US first, while PS3 in Japan first.

If anything the window could be as little as 3 months if PS3 launches in Japan in March 2006.

From what I've heard the PS3 and Xenon should have similar powers. Much like Xbox and PS2. One will do one thing better then the other and vice versa. It is in the hands of the developer. Also tool support will play a HUGE part in developer preference. And the word on the street is that publisher are doing Xenon lead SKUs, much how they did PS2 lead SKUs.
 
Yeah, I'll be getting one for sure if it's backwards compatible with XBOX games (or an add-on or different model makes it backwards compatible).

If it's not, I'm not sure if I'll get one.
 
Top Bottom