someone needs to make a NeoGaf WP7 app.Sir Fragula said:Perhaps; I just can't see what the issues are. I mean my biggest complain with browsing the web is that the NeoGAF SecondApps page is skinned to look like the bloody iPhone. Everything else is smooth, quick loading and accurately reproduced.
dLMN8R said:Right now it's unfair to just say WP7 is "IE7 rendering code" in the first place. According to Microsoft, it's somewhat based in IE7, but with a ton of IE8 stuff as well.
Iced_Eagle said:The plot on this "big" update thickens! First update will be in January for copy/paste + CDMA. The "big" update will be released in February and will be detailed at Mobile World Congress.
http://www.wpcentral.com/developer-says-wp7-update-coming-february-updated
Can't wait for more details, and confirmation of the timelines of these updates.![]()
Sprint will get the Touch Pro 2 successor in early 2011. Just check the OP.maximum360 said:Sprint needs to have something ready quick. I've been holding out with my Touch Pro 2 but it's feeling very dated now. I'm ready to pass that baby on to my wife.![]()
I feel the same way as he does. I wish someone would give us a more concrete date.brotkasten said:Sprint will get the Touch Pro 2 successor in early 2011. Just check the OP.
It would help if the desktop version was actually finished.shantyman said:I assume at some point IE will be reworked yo use IE 9 underpinnings. The real questions is when?
Maybe January is not completely unrealistic. The first WP7 update should bring copy/paste and CDMA support and that's coming out 'very soon' (in few weeks) and Verizon is supposed to get the HTC 7 Trophy in January.samus i am said:I feel the same way as he does. I wish someone would give us a more concrete date.
brotkasten said:Sprint will get the Touch Pro 2 successor in early 2011. Just check the OP.
Totakeke said:You know what's the biggest loss with Microsoft not making a WP7 phone themselves?
It's not the hardware design, but the lack of a phone that can also act as a really good media device. The current crop of smartphone makers (aside from Apple of course which is still decent to good) just don't cut it in that department. WP7 has a great media player software, great music streaming service, but no device that can push that to the fullest. Unlike Android which has shitty media capabilities, I'd actually want a WP7 phone as my main media player, but the sound quality would probably suck for most of the smartphones, and finding out the one that is actually good, even if there is one, will be difficult because there's hardly any smartphone reviewers who are actually also audiophiles.
I'm not trying to sound pretentious, but Zune HD is really a great media player and WP7 is nowhere that yet due to hardware.
Totakeke said:You know what's the biggest loss with Microsoft not making a WP7 phone themselves?
It's not the hardware design, but the lack of a phone that can also act as a really good media device. The current crop of smartphone makers (aside from Apple of course which is still decent to good) just don't cut it in that department. WP7 has a great media player software, great music streaming service, but no device that can push that to the fullest. Unlike Android which has shitty media capabilities, I'd actually want a WP7 phone as my main media player, but the sound quality would probably suck for most of the smartphones, and finding out the one that is actually good, even if there is one, will be difficult because there's hardly any smartphone reviewers who are actually also audiophiles.
I'm not trying to sound pretentious, but Zune HD is really a great media player and WP7 is nowhere that yet due to hardware.
Raistlin said:And why again is the iPhone good for audiophiles?
Brettison said:Due to what hardware wise? Software wise maybe, but I fail to see what's so blocking it hardware wise. Sound quality is ALWAYS gonna be iffy on a device this small too.
Totakeke said:Um, because the sound quality is better? They put in better hardware? You can also use line out docks with it to bypass the internal amp? Because other smartphone makers typically don't emphasize sound quality or care about it at all? I believe even iPhone doesn't beat their iPods in terms of SQ, but at least it's still decent.
Sansa clip is way smaller than any of these smartphones and it's SQ is pretty good. To clarify, I'm not talking about amazing SQ, I'm just talking about at least decent and doesn't sound muffled or shrilly with harsh highs and that's already a lot to ask for.
Brettison said:Sound Quality on my Focus is better than my Mom's iPhone 4.
Which phone do you have?Billen said:I have to restart my mobile quite a lot. Having had it running for a while, you can't even start the games (Live) function. It starts loading then it, yes, crashes back to the "desktop".![]()
It is? In some cases, some cases not.Totakeke said:Um, because the sound quality is better?
It's funny you mention that considering they only recently opened up digital docking. Previously it was all via analog.They put in better hardware? You can also use line out docks with it to bypass the internal amp?
Sweeping generalizations are sweeping. Go use one of the SE Walkman phones, etc. Obviously it isn't a priority for many manufacturers, but some do consider it.Because other smartphone makers typically don't emphasize sound quality or care about it at all? I believe even iPhone doesn't beat their iPods in terms of SQ, but at least it's still decent.
Raistlin said:It is? In some cases, some cases not.
One of the big complaints for iPod/iPhone is the shit headphone amp. It is far from audiophile.
It's funny you mention that considering they only recently opened up digital docking. Previously it was all via analog.
Regardless, yes it is nice that they finally offer this. From my understanding MS is working on an update to dock via miniUSB (it's already working on dev builds IIRC) ... so we likely will see this in the future. Probably faster than Apple actually. Not sure of the status for BT-based docking.
Sweeping generalizations are sweeping. Go use one of the SE Walkman phones, etc. Obviously it isn't a priority for many manufacturers, but some do consider it.
But how do you reach this conclusion when you said there are no reviews of WP7 hardware by audiophiles?Totakeke said:Funny, funny, funny what? You're talking a lot about inconsequential stuffs and you just confirmed what I said. iPhone has better sound quality, there are no windows phone 7 with good sound quality from what we know (SE doesn't make WP7 phones last I checked and SE Walkman is NOT a smartphone).
And before this degrades into an iPhone vs WP7 generic debate, I'd like to add that having great media software and music streaming services is a PLUS. It's just a shame that there's no device that's up to the task of delivering quality sound.
Charred Greyface said:But how do you reach this conclusion when you said there are no reviews of WP7 hardware by audiophiles?
Out of curiousity what tests do you use to determine this? I know a lot of subjective reviews say things like "sounds good" "sounds bad" "better than X" "worse than Y" but I'm sure there's some hard data out there for audio quality.Totakeke said:...iPhone has better sound quality, there are no windows phone 7 with good sound quality from what we know...
Well THAT'S bulletproof pre-defense right there. Oh well, so you don't know AND you're drawing conclusions?Totakeke said:I did put "from what we know".
kazinova said:Well THAT'S bulletproof pre-defense right there. Oh well, so you don't know AND you're drawing conclusions?
kazinova said:Out of curiousity what tests do you use to determine this? I know a lot of subjective reviews say things like "sounds good" "sounds bad" "better than X" "worse than Y" but I'm sure there's some hard data out there for audio quality.
I'm not much of an audiophile so I don't even know what metric someone would use to the determine an objective "best".
It's probably not worth discussing further without hard data, because frankly I think my Focus sounds as good as my iPhone 3G did. And that's all that really matters to me.
:lol :lol :lolCharred Greyface said:But how do you reach this conclusion when you said there are no reviews of WP7 hardware by audiophiles?
Totakeke said:Um, because the sound quality is better? They put in better hardware? You can also use line out docks with it to bypass the internal amp? Because other smartphone makers typically don't emphasize sound quality or care about it at all? I believe even iPhone doesn't beat their iPods in terms of SQ, but at least it's still decent.
The fact that a digital connection only recently being available is inconsequential to your point?Totakeke said:Funny, funny, funny what? You're talking a lot about inconsequential stuffs and you just confirmed what I said.
Based on what exactly? You state there are no audiophile reviews, and then claim with authority iPhone is better. Troll much?iPhone has better sound quality,
And how do we know this exactly?there are no windows phone 7 with good sound quality from what we know
Unless plans have changed, SE has Android Walkman in the pipe.(SE doesn't make WP7 phones last I checked and SE Walkman is NOT a smartphone).
You're the one degrading this thread. Wow.And before this degrades into an iPhone vs WP7 generic debate, I'd like to add that having great media software and music streaming services is a PLUS. It's just a shame that there's no device that's up to the task of delivering quality sound.
Totakeke said:Alright, I apologize for intruding this thread. All I wanted was to discuss WP7 phones sound quality and my point wasn't to raise a comparison against iPhone or whatever else, we can discuss that but that wasn't my point. I take back whatever I said and I'm sorry for making judgments about WP7 phones.
I'll appreciate if you let this issue die.
Raistlin said:The fact that a digital connection only recently being available is inconsequential to your point?
The fact the amp is all but shit in an iPod, let alone an iPhone, is inconsequential? :lol
Based on what exactly? You state there are no audiophile reviews, and then claim with authority iPhone is better. Troll much?
And how do we know this exactly?
Unless plans have changed, SE has Android Walkman in the pipe.
You're the one degrading this thread. Wow.
Dez said:For what it's worth, Anandtech's ipod touch 4th gen review put it and the iphone 4 ahead of or better than the Zune HD in all sound categories.
http://www.anandtech.com/Show/Index...od-touch-2010-review-not-a-poor-mans-iphone-4
Point taken though, that no one has reviewed the windows phones as an mp3 player.
Mr. Snrub said:I don't think anyone is upset about the discussion, just that you make a lot of claims without anything to back them up. I am interested in using my WP7 phone as my main media device, so I actually am trying to find articles about the sound quality and how it stacks up (using a Focus here).
Fair points. Haven't been bothered by either in daily usage, and I always make it a point of using the power button on my Omnia for screen-off/on.Stumpokapow said:1) There was no Wifi strength indicator. I had to page over to Settings, Wifi, I'm connected. I didn't disconnect at any point to check it on 3G so I have no idea if a 3G icon would have come up if not, but I didn't like that there was no Wifi sign.
2) If the phone went inactive and turned off, I had to use the top button to reactivate it, not the face button. On the iPhone both the home button and the power button would work for reactivating the phone.
Download game/app, press "check install".3) While downloading games from the games marketplace, there didn't seem to be an easy way to view the download progress or queue and although it did background download there was no indication that it was background downloading. If I went back to home, I had no idea if the downloads were done or in progress. I had to go back into Games, Get More Games, click on the game I was downloading--and there's my progress. I intuited this after a while, but it seems like an iffy choice.
Mobile operators and manufacturers are producing their own applications and don't want people who aren't customers from using them. They're all optional and many of them add value. I - personally - don't see the problem.4) LG Branded apps in the marketplace. Fuck device/carrier branding. One marketplace for all is non-negotiable. Ugh.
Fair point.5) No quick mute; volume down just steadily lowers volume. Either a mute lever or a hold-for-two-seconds-and-auto-mute function would have been appreciated.
Haven't really come across this as an issue in daily use. The Omnia's back and search buttons aren't permanently lit either, but once you know they're there it just becomes second nature.6) Almost no application has a back gesture. They all use the virtual back button at the bottom of the touch screen. That's fine, but on this particular phone the back button is not permanently backlit, and I didn't even realize it was there for about ten minutes when I was using the phone. I'm not sure if a dedicated back button is a plus or minus on the overall (I can think of use-cases for both sides), but it being unclear is definitely a minus.
Can see what you mean, but hasn't bothered me.7) While the UI is very nice and the titles are large and obvious and there's some great typography use, sometimes the titles are awkwardly cut off. Like, under games the title looked like "games"--the s was kind of just barely cut off. It feels like some of the UI panels are very well scaled for the phone and some aren't.
There is a prompt; the arrow button...8) The main menu seems a little unbalanced. You've got two horizontal tiles, and those tiles bring you to about 75-80% of the screen... and then you've got an empty black space. It's not a continuous flow to the next horizontal screen, there's no prompt that there is a next horizontal screen, and the tiles don't fill up the screen. I'm not sure why they did it this way.
Definitely agree there needs to be some improvements to the sub-category structure of the marketplace on the phone. It's fine on the Zune application but that's only a stop-gap.9) The games marketplace doesn't seem particularly well laid out. The main categories are fine--XBL, Top, Free, New--and navigation between them works fine. But once you're in a category, it's just a giant list. I have no idea how the lists were sorted, there's no pagination, and I feel like this isn't going to scale well. The iOS App Store is easy to get lost in, certainly, but I definitely feel like it scaled better.
Haven't noticed, but wouldn't object to greater consistency a lá X360 here.10) Achievement integration isn't visually consistent from the games I checked out. I would have preferred a standardized achievement list display and a standardized achievement unlocked display.
Hmm, hadn't noticed this. Just loaded up Flowerz, used the power button to switch on sleep-mode, swiped the lock-screen up and was back in the game?11) When the phone goes inactive you get booted out of the game you're playing and have to relaunch it. What the hell were they thinking there?
That's a feature not a bug. Once you get used to the Metro UI, you'll learn that "cut off" text indicates a particular UI View. The UI panel wasn't scaled improperly, it doesn't really matter where the Panorama title was cut off. After a while nobody expects to read the entire title on one screen anyway.Stumpokapow said:7) While the UI is very nice and the titles are large and obvious and there's some great typography use, sometimes the titles are awkwardly cut off. Like, under games the title looked like "games"--the s was kind of just barely cut off. It feels like some of the UI panels are very well scaled for the phone and some aren't.
I've already been beat with answer. But you have a point though. I think the Panorama and Pivot view should be used on the homescreen as well so you have the live tiles as the first view, scroll to the right for list view, scroll further for a categories view and so on. Then the bouncing arrow wouldn't be necessary.Stumpokapow said:8) The main menu seems a little unbalanced. You've got two horizontal tiles, and those tiles bring you to about 75-80% of the screen... and then you've got an empty black space. It's not a continuous flow to the next horizontal screen, there's no prompt that there is a next horizontal screen, and the tiles don't fill up the screen. I'm not sure why they did it this way.
I also found this odd but Andorid users have been living without a hardware mute button for years so *shrug* Slightly off tangent but is there any modern smartphone with a hardware volume slider?Stumpokapow said:5) No quick mute; volume down just steadily lowers volume. Either a mute lever or a hold-for-two-seconds-and-auto-mute function would have been appreciated.
I keep bringing them up because your claim has continued to be that Apple and Apple alone care about audio quality.Totakeke said:You can also see Raistlin talking about Sony Ericsson phones, which I basically agree that their brand is well known for the better audio quality and you can find a similar comment made by me around a year ago on this forums if you search for it, but they're not WP7 phone makers right now although he keeps bringing them up.
Charred Greyface said:I also found this odd but Andorid users have been living without a hardware mute button for years so *shrug* Slightly off tangent but is there any modern smartphone with a hardware volume slider?
The mute/vibrate control on the Pre2 is a slider but the volume control is the 'plus' and 'minus' buttons like on the iPhone and WP7 phones. I 'm asking about a volume control that is a slider. I don't think the WP7 spec requirements allows for mute button but the manufacturer could deliver something similar with a volume control slider.Tapiozona said:All WebOS phones have a hardware mute and volume button/slider.
Brettison said:1) No indicator... sucks but eh I never really care about my indicator beyond just knowing hey can I get service or not wifi wise.
As far as the criticisms of preference there's no "right" or "wrong", I prefer the unique layout and Metro UI cues that prompt text to cutoff and the start screen to the look the way it does. As others have pointed out some of the usability things you missed are there. Part of the curse of being different in design I suppose...Stumpokapow said:Am I wrong with any of these criticisms? Can they be changed in the settings or are they per-model settings? I'm not really a candidate for buying a WP7 phone anyway, but I'm still curious if my impressions here are right.