brotkasten said:The N9 has a front facing camera, but it's located at the bottom for some reason.
http://i.imgur.com/mUepQ.jpg
go back tens of pages, it was announced as optional when mango was shown to developers. that was also before the skype buyout announcement. i'm sure skype video calling will be heavily pushed for mango.PG2G said:Just curious, but where have you seen front facing cameras mentioned as optional (or even at all) in Mango?
thirty said:it looks more like a proximity sensor than a camera. if the default is landscape it will be a nice change from the portrait format that apple has pushed on the masses. good gawd i hate seeing portrait format pics and vids.
It's the camera.I think that's the proximity sensor.
In the N950 the front facing camera is in top right corner and on N9 it is in the bottom right corner.
Strange, I really can't remember that, but it looks like the Nokia phone still has one.thirty said:go back tens of pages, it was announced as optional when mango was shown to developers. that was also before the skype buyout announcement. i'm sure skype video calling will be heavily pushed for mango.
More importantly, microSIM slot. Ugh.thirty said:i looked at the specs of the n9 and that is a front facing camera. no mention of the resolution though.
other interesting specs on the N9 include a 1450mah battery, 1gb of ram, and 720p (not 1080p) video.
i looked at the specs of the n9 and that is a front facing camera. no mention of the resolution though.Copernicus said:I think that's the proximity sensor.
thirty said:front facing cams in mango is optional. i'm sure we'll see it in the high end models. speaking of this, is the N9 even confirmed with a front facing camera? if not, i doubt this is the model nokia is going to debut with in the US. i expect them to enter the market with a bang.
can some one professionally shop this with a mango home page. preferably a motion gif showing off the live tiles.
http://cdn.pocketnow.com/html/portal/news/0000017363//NokiaN9.jpg[g][/quote]
Heres my Photoshop skills on full display
[IMG]http://i55.tinypic.com/2lst9nr.jpg
thirty said:i looked at the specs of the n9 and that is a front facing camera. no mention of the resolution though.
other interesting specs on the N9 include a 1450mah battery, 1gb of ram, and 720p (not 1080p) video.
Meus Renaissance said:Heres my Photoshop skills on full display
MCD said:No Windows/Back/Search keys?
jagowar said:http://wmpoweruser.com/new-nokia-sea-ray-picture-reveals-virtual-buttons/
Interesting revelation if it exists on the final verison.....
giga said:http://wmpoweruser.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/nokiasearay.png[IMG][/QUOTE]
the iceberg that sinks Windows Phone
thanks, Nokia.
D4Danger said:the iceberg that sinks Windows Phone
thanks, Nokia.
giga said:
dLMN8R said:http://dominateyourserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/509610172_d46e6056e7_o.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law"]Poe's law[/URL]
Teetris said:Am I.. Am I missing something here? That Nokia phone looks like 90% of the other smartphones out there
Teetris said:Am I.. Am I missing something here? That Nokia phone looks like 90% of the other smartphones out there
The virtual buttons are the bad thing. If they're real, that's it.PG2G said:Not sure what you guys are complaining about. Just a day or two ago people were impressed with the N9. Now we get the exact same phone running WP7 and its a bad thing?
brotkasten said:The virtual buttons are the bad thing. If they're real, that's it.
PG2G said:That said, I have never really expected the first Nokia device to be high end or ground breaking.
brotkasten said:But that's really what everyone is expecting and exactly what Nokia needs. A high end smartphone in the holiday that "blows your socks off". Nokia is Microsoft's premium OEM.
You want Samsung to save you from virtual buttons? Have you used the capacitive buttons on the Omnia??? I love mine but the buttons are a pain in the arse.thirty said:on screen buttons r a big fail. Samsung, save us n show a super amoled plus 4.5" screen beast.
NotTarts said:Apart from gaming, is there really any need for higher-spec hardware in Windows Phone 7? Just curious.
I can sort of see the same thing with the iPhone 5, though. 3G > 3GS upgrade made sense (basic OS functions ran slowly), as did the 3GS > iPhone 4 upgrade (higher screen resolution), but I can't see much reason for another processor upgrade so soon. I guess it's just progress for progress' sake.PG2G said:You could have said the same for the iPhone 3GS, and then the iPhone 4. But look at what we're getting in the iPhone 5 (assuming its the same internals as the iPad 2). They need to be in line with the competition.
Besides, the more and more the OS has to do, the more performance will diminish.
Web page loading is directly connected to the processor. IE could really benefit from a faster chip.NotTarts said:I can sort of see the same thing with the iPhone 5, though. 3G > 3GS upgrade made sense (basic OS functions ran slowly), as did the 3GS > iPhone 4 upgrade (higher screen resolution), but I can't see much reason for another processor upgrade so soon. I guess it's just progress for progress' sake.
giga said:Web page loading is directly connected to the processor. IE could really benefit from a faster chip.
The MSM7x30? The only upgrade is a slightly better gpu. It's a chip from Q2 2010.VanMardigan said:The new phones this fall will ship with new processors.
jagowar said:WP7 will be very much in the same vein of iOS but a bit more open in letting oem's have multiple handsets using the same hardware spec and over time updating the spec. There is a new spec for 7.5 and I expect it to be updated again next year when (I assume) windows 8 takes over.
giga said:The MSM7x30? The only upgrade is a slightly better gpu. It's a chip from Q2 2010.