• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[Wired] AI Is Already Taking Jobs in the Video Game Industry

RoboFu

One of the green rats
its a pretty moronic way to go. Companies use AI so they can make products cheaper that people can no longer afford because there are no good paying jobs.
 

Mortisfacio

Member
I still think the "Learn to Code" meme history is hilarious

2014: Journos start telling people to learn to code
2015-2016: Telling miners to learn to code and we shut down coal mines to go green
2019: Journos get fired and 4chan memes back at them to learn to code
Today: Displacement of junior devs due to AI doing the mundane coding. Maybe they should work the mines?
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
its a pretty moronic way to go. Companies use AI so they can make products cheaper that people can no longer afford because there are no good paying jobs.

It's the only way to go. Humans have constantly looked for more efficient ways to do work. It's been happening for 100s of years. There's no reason to stop now just because A.I. is the next step.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
End of the day, there's always jobs. In fact, there's so many jobs unemployment rates are still at historic lows (aside from covid years which were often mandated shut downs). So the jobs are there.

Comes down to if someone is good enough to hold onto a job and if someone can adjust and get a different one if they are cut.

Unless a company is going bankrupt and everyone gets canned, what do most companies do when they do mass layoffs the past bunch of years? 5% or 10% of people tops? So despite all the years of tech and AI killing jobs (where's all the AI trucks taking over shipping?) a typical company still keeps 90%+ of people. And that assumes the company cuts people. My company has been growing steady in sales and employees for over 10 years since I joined.

So dont fall for all the articles about job losses only. There's never articles about hiring (except Amazon and WM promoting holiday temp worker increases). If you truly only believed in losses only, every company would be insanely down workers and unemployment rates would be 80%.

Maybe all the digital deskjobbers who might be canned die to ChatGPT or whatever taking your job should get a bit more old school and work for a company that makes bread or cans of soup. You still need people to do physical parts of a job and even the desk job tasks can only be automated so much. Companies still need brain power to think of ideas, negotiate deals, agree on strategies etc....

It sounds like the digital jobbers getting phased out are Phase 2 of paper pushers losing jobs to automated invoicing and reports the past 30-40 years. A machine could do it way faster and more accurately (assuming things are set up perfectly). To keep a paper pushing kind of role, you got to adjust to the tech and be someone who can take that data and improve on it (ie. fix mistakes or use your head to do wonders with it a numbnut program like SAP can just spit out data).
 
Last edited:

ResurrectedContrarian

Suffers with mild autism
I still think the "Learn to Code" meme history is hilarious

2014: Journos start telling people to learn to code
2015-2016: Telling miners to learn to code and we shut down coal mines to go green
2019: Journos get fired and 4chan memes back at them to learn to code
Today: Displacement of junior devs due to AI doing the mundane coding. Maybe they should work the mines?
the saddest part is the wave after wave of programs and toys aimed at teaching every kid to code (and we have to reach girls too, make sure all girls code!)

but now the value of being able to code at a junior to mid level is very low on the market; and none of the people who simply learned the basics can contribute, you'll need to have built a more systematic fluency with the entire tech stack in order to be valuable.
 

YeulEmeralda

Linux User
the saddest part is the wave after wave of programs and toys aimed at teaching every kid to code (and we have to reach girls too, make sure all girls code!)

but now the value of being able to code at a junior to mid level is very low on the market; and none of the people who simply learned the basics can contribute, you'll need to have built a more systematic fluency with the entire tech stack in order to be valuable.
Ah yes the "we only want people with 20 years of experience" job listings.

At some point everyone was a junior- something corporations tend to forget.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Lol nobody cared when factory jobs are gone but not my LGBTQRZ artists!
No kidding.

Despite blur collar jobs having union representation and it sometimes spills into public battles, I dont a sense the avg person gives a shit unless they are one of the people working the job. I dont think the avg person cares much for all the crazy LBQT stuff either. But for some reason, left leaning LBGT hot topics got lots of traction the past 5-10 years (even among politicians), while the factory work transitioning to overseas or automation the past 40 years is kind of accepted as part of society.

Probably has to do with factory guys being pretty quiet (aside from strikes) as they arent the type do do endless social media campaigns and cancel culture. But a pink haired person will do that all day on Twitter.
 
Last edited:

ResurrectedContrarian

Suffers with mild autism
Ah yes the "we only want people with 20 years of experience" job listings.

At some point everyone was a junior- something corporations tend to forget.
that was already a major hiring issue, to be sure -- every job looking for pre-existing experience

But it's considerably worse now with AI. I can speak from experience on the other side of the equation, that where I would have added a junior person to my current team in prior years, now just 2 of us higher level developers can do the work of an entire team, by having AI churn out all the first-draft low level & boilerplate for every project or task. A junior's ability to just do basic clean code doesn't really amount to any value added now.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
that was already a major hiring issue, to be sure -- every job looking for pre-existing experience

But it's considerably worse now with AI. I can speak from experience on the other side of the equation, that where I would have added a junior person to my current team in prior years, now just 2 of us higher level developers can do the work of an entire team, by having AI churn out all the first-draft low level & boilerplate for every project or task. A junior's ability to just do basic clean code doesn't really amount to any value added now.
Ya, hiring only vets isnt new. Some companies hiring juniors or new grads. Some dont. I've worked at both kinds of companies. Typically the larger the company with way more roles to fill they are open to newbies as they need someone to fill the seat. A small leaner company or dept can afford to look for an experienced person.

If techie kinds of people are having a hard time, one advantage they have over other roles is they can do offline work or make websites or portfolios of their work. Or prove they can do different kinds of programming or hobby work on their own time using freeware tools.

You cant do that if youre in sales, finance, marketing etc.... Youre job is based on actual company stuff and tools.
 
It's only going to get worse. Megacorps are all too happy to take jobs away for A.I. so they can save a few bucks and it will continue to spread into other industries until we have an unemployment crisis.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom