BronsonLee
Member
And people thought Maleficent was gonna bomb fuckin' hard
And people thought Maleficent was gonna bomb fuckin' hard
Looks like it. I was told on twitter the budget was $100 million.So Power Rangers overdelivering?
If GITS loses to Boss Baby, the Internet would implode.Since Ghost in the Shell came up, boxoffice.com updated their long term forecast list yesterday.
Ghost in the Shell was downgraded to a $32M opening weekend and $82M total. The Boss Baby was raised to $33M opening weekend and $112M total.
Their initial forecast for Alien Covenant is $35M OW/$90M total
It will come out in China. Pretty much everything from Lionsgate does. Nerve came out in China.
It's sort of crazy that Beauty and the Beast will end up over The Jungle Book's domestic total by next Friday or Saturday.
Maleficent's total was really impressive back when it released, but now that's mid-level for Disney's live action fairy tale stuff.
Lion King maybe. Aladdin isn't. Not unless there is some very inspired casting for the genie. But looking at how the blu release of Aladdin went, that seems to have fallen a bit in stature over the years.aladdin is going to shit on beauty and the beast
and lion king is going to shit on aladdin
i'm thinking $2b+ for lion king, honestly. it's gonna be massive.
It was made like a superhero movie.Yeah but they're also not nostalgic for edgy teen power rangers. The whole concept never made sense. They shown have targeted this and made it like a Superhero movie not this entirely weird offshoot that the franchise has never been marketed as or experimented with for the franchise.
And people thought Maleficent was gonna bomb fuckin' hard
There was a lot of rumors about the production being a disaster if I recall correctly. I do wonder if a straight adaptation of Sleeping Beauty would have done even better, like a Jungle Book type tun.Ya, it was a popular pick in that year's bomb of the year thread.
the summer of 2014 was pretty light on outright bombs.
Lion King maybe. Aladdin isn't. Not unless there is some very inspired casting for the genie. But looking at how the blu release of Aladdin went, that seems to have fallen a bit in stature over the years.
Still gonna make bank.
Lion King maybe. Aladdin isn't. Not unless there is some very inspired casting for the genie. But looking at how the blu release of Aladdin went, that seems to have fallen a bit in stature over the years.
Still gonna make bank.
No. It will be Kevin HartIt's totally gonna be Jack Black.
Will CHIPs end up above or below Live by Night?
No. It will be Kevin Hart
No. It will be Kevin Hart
Guy Ritchie is directing Aladdin, right? I feel like there's a good chance the film is a real weird piece of work that doesn't quite connect with audiences in the same way as other Disney live-action films.
Guy Ritchie is directing Aladdin, right? I feel like there's a good chance the film is a real weird piece of work that doesn't quite connect with audiences in the same way as other Disney live-action films.
The RockWho's a modern day robin willaims who has a good voice. Being a box office draw helps too
Kevin hart is the first person that comes to mind tbh
The Rock
Already replaced Robin Williams in Jumanji
James Earl Jones and Gambino as Simba.Do they have cast announcements for Lion King? if they don't bring back Irons for Scar, like, why bother at all.
Why did Disney do a bunch of direct to video sequels of films like Lion King and Aladdin anyway? They would have made a ton in the box office.Lion King is an absolute beast. It's box office receipts, the DVD sales for the shitty sequels (and half sequels), the broadway receipts. its gonna be an event.
Not modern at all but could somebody like Jim Carrey replicate that energy?Who's a modern day robin willaims who has a good voice. Being a box office draw helps too
Kevin hart is the first person that comes to mind tbh
I think it was just a different era and the idea of spending a bunch of money on a Lion King 2 and releasing it in theaters probably never occurred to anyone.. Sequels in general were not nearly as ubiquitous back in the '90s as they are today, and that goes doubly so for animated films. I'm pretty sure Disney didn't release a sequel in theaters until Toy Story 2.Why did Disney do a bunch of direct to video sequels of films like Lion King and Aladdin anyway? They would have made a ton in the box office.
WHO WHO WHO WHO WHOApparently the new day from wwe are playing the hyenas
If they're just having a dude voice over a CGI Genie, the guy who currently does the voice in Kingdom Hearts is a pretty good Williams imitation (it's not Castellaneta anymore).I dunno, but Kevin Hart is a modern day Martin Lawrence. But much worse, because at least he gave us Martin and Bad Boys movies. fuck that guy breh.
Genie seems like one of those irreplaceable acts, honestly I think it should be a woman for the disney remake. Makes things a bit easier.
If they're just having a dude voice over a CGI Genie, the guy who currently does the voice in Kingdom Hearts is a pretty good Williams imitation (it's not Castellaneta anymore).
https://youtu.be/KgDODp1sWkY
Not modern at all but could somebody like Jim Carrey replicate that energy?
I just miss Jim Carrey :[
Honestly he would be great
But I expect Disney to go after someone younger and more recognizable 😑 Hart fits the bill.
Apparently the new day from wwe are playing the hyenas
400M domesticSpeaking of, what's the early over/under we're thinking on Justice League? I haven't been following the superhero box office prediction thread, but I'm thinking under $300M domestic.
Just think The Jungle Book with no Mowgli. That film wasn't far off what you're describing.Is the Lion King going to be CGI with real nature shots? There's no humans in it.
Just think The Jungle Book with no Mowgli. That film wasn't far off what you're describing.
forreal. Lion King and Aladdin are gonna be the trickiest.
bring back Irons and Nathan Lane.
What.