So may have missed it, but for the success of Girl's Trip, has anyone in this thread seen it yet? How is it?
It is excellent. Obviously a date/wife/girlfriend movie, but well worth the price of the ticket.
So may have missed it, but for the success of Girl's Trip, has anyone in this thread seen it yet? How is it?
I saw someone else on gaf say it, but Valerian comes across as some type of money laundering scheme lol.
I saw someone else on gaf say it, but Valerian comes across as some type of money laundering scheme lol.
Slayven says that about various films.
Valerian strikes me as what it actually is though. Besson blowing all the clout he had on a super expensive dream project. Now that it failed, he's probably back to Lucy budgets for the rest of his career.
Known money launderer Slayven would know
So may have missed it, but for the success of Girl's Trip, has anyone in this thread seen it yet? How is it?
Would you be shocked if I am proven right?
Girls Trip played to an audience that was 79% female vs. 21% male, of which 50% of the overall audience was under the age of 30. Additionally, 59% of the audience was African American, 19% Caucasian, 17% Hispanic and 3% Asian.
I wouldn't be shocked if you had a stake in this money laundering business.
I had my eyes on this one as I noticed it's premiering here soon in Denmark too. Might check it out.Has anyone seen a movie called Tulip Fever yet? We're showing it here in Stockholm at our cinema but I haven't seen it yet and I'm unsure if it has opened in the rest of the world.
Stars Alicia Vikander, Dane DeHaan, Zach Galifianakis, Judi Dench, Christoph Waltz and Cara Delevingne.
If i was laundering money, I would not have a just a regular ps4
My main streaming box is now my XBox One because 1: it supports 5ghz wireless and 2: PS4's wifi speeds are traaaaaash
Because your broke ass can't afford a PS4 Pro
My main streaming box is now my XBox One because 1: it supports 5ghz wireless and 2: PS4's wifi speeds are traaaaaash
One of eight movies awarded the incentives in this round, the Brie Larson-starrer with Samuel L. Jackson will receive just more than $20.7 million in credits, making Captain Marvel the first Marvel movie primarily produced in California since 2014s Captain America: The Winter Soldier.
Just a One? Not an S? Broke asss.....
I didnt jump onto current gen until last fall. Unless you count the Wii U (which no one does).
Bronson was the kid with a bunch of these for N64 multiplayer
Bad hot takes in box office threads and a PS4 Amateur owner 🙄If i was laundering money, I would not have just a regular ps4
https://twitter.com/007/status/889575964983914496
Yep, lines up with what I heard and Kswis predicted.
2nd trailer for Thor vs. Like the 10th for Justice League. Better compare second trailer JL to 2nd trailer Thor 3.Adding fuel to the never ending fire: The new Justice League trailer has 17.9M views since going live, while Thor 3's has 20.3M views.
Both were youtube ads for a bit so I don't think it really matters. Thor definitely seems to be getting a lot of buzz though.Adding fuel to the never ending fire: The new Justice League trailer has 17.9M views since going live, while Thor 3's has 20.3M views.
If Dunkirk really somehow only cost $100m this is gonna be a very big success for Nolan
Have you seen Tangled? It looks amazing. It also had a troubled production that stretched out for years. The directors were changed twice.
What? No. You're imagining things. Glen Keane originally wanted it to be traditionally animated, but Disney never went for that.
IMO trailer views aren't really a good indication of Box office.
Thor: Ragnarok teaser trailer: 41 781 000 views
Star Wars: The Last Jedi teaser trailer: 37 550 000 views
Thor was released 4 days earlier, but both around the same time. This is probably what pushed some people on GAF to think Ragnarok was going to gross over 1 billion right?
I really can't tell if you're joking.If, and that is a BIG IF, Ragnarok breaks $1b (or even just outgrosses the other comic films this year), can we just assume that Mark Ruffalo is the secret sauce to Marvel films blowing up at the box office?
Avengers, Age of Ultron, and Iron Man 3 are the kings of that heap. All feature Ruffalo. And we are seeing now with Spider-Man that RDJ isn't the $1b guarantee we thought he was, even if Civil War did break that mark.
I really can't tell if you're joking.
So may have missed it, but for the success of Girl's Trip, has anyone in this thread seen it yet? How is it?
For me, a rich visual imagination just doesn't cut it. There needs to be a solid underlying foundation of a good movie
I really can't tell if you're joking.
LOL MY exact thought on it.
I assume he's joking though....
Same here. Luckily, it's not just visual.
The disastrous opening weekend in the U.S. of Luc Bessons Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets has left EuropaCorp with a hangover, as the Paris-based company saw its stock value drop by 8.31% by the close of trading on Monday.
Believed to be the most expensive independent movie of all time with a budget of $180 million*, Valerian grossed just $17 million from 3,553 theaters and landed in fifth place
Although EuropaCorp has a limited risk on Valerian about 90% of the films budget was financed with pre-sales and equity investment, Besson says it desperately needs the film to be hit as the company just posted record losses of 119.9 million euros ($135 million) for the fiscal year ending March 31.
Valerian has to make $400 million worldwide to help EuropaCorp climb into the black and justify a sequel, according to several financial analysts, including Pavel Govciyan, an analyst at Natixis.
Avatar is #1. If Avatar were within the $300 million range, we'd see CGI spectacles on that level from every studio, every year. But we haven't seen a single one in the nearly 10 years since Avatar was released.Avator nor Suicide Squad was over 300 million, although I remember all the rumors about Avatar being way over.
Pirates of the Caribbean At World's End and On Stranger Tides production budgets were at or over 300 million dollars.
But not everyone can use CGI as effectively as Cameron. His movies are expensive, but you see every penny on screen.Avatar is #1. If Avatar were within the $300 million range, we'd see CGI spectacles on that level from every studio, every year. But we haven't seen a single one in the nearly 10 years since Avatar was released.
Avatar is #1. If Avatar were within the $300 million range, we'd see CGI spectacles on that level from every studio, every year. But we haven't seen a single one in the nearly 10 years since Avatar was released.
And despite claims that the production and marketing costs of Avatar have sailed north of half a billion dollars, Fox insists that the math is fuzzy.
The budget for Avatar, a Fox spokesperson bluntly told TheWrap this week, is $237 million, with $150 million for promotion, end of story.
Avatar is #1. If Avatar were within the $300 million range, we'd see CGI spectacles on that level from every studio, every year. But we haven't seen a single one in the nearly 10 years since Avatar was released.
There's absolutely no reason for a studio with shareholders to want to hide having bankrolled the most expensive movie ever, no sir.
There's absolutely no reason for a studio with shareholders to want to hide having bankrolled the most expensive movie ever, no sir.
Busty summed it up better than I could.
There was a reason for various trades to report the budget was way over $300 million before the release, but Fox adamantly insist on that $237 million figure. Maybe it's what they paid, not including the other investors.