i'm laughing harder at this than i really should be
Why would I give a fuck about Bill Burr
i'm laughing harder at this than i really should be
It just always puts a smile on my face to hear Bill Burr shit on the city and audience.
I know you didn't. I just know what you like, and what button to press. *beep*
She's not as bad as...
This isn't some nerd hill I want to die on. I enjoy what I enjoy and I see creativity where I see it. From where I stand Marvel movies are, again, fun popcorn flicks. I have no real problem with them. They're pretty much the definition of adequate. A movie like BvS, though, to me is so much more. It's a visual treat in a way Marvel movies have yet to even attempt to touch. The musical scoring is, again, one area Marvel just doesn't give a fuck. Those two things alone would put DC movies on a plateau above Marvel for me, though there's a bunch more I like with DC stuff, too.
She rubs people up the wrong way with her attitude and persona. Kind of like a figjam attitude. I personally can't stand her.
It must be like how "everyone" hates Tom Cruise.Really? Huh. Is there any videos of her being this miserable person you disagree with? I'd like some background. I don't tend to follow actors so closely, so perhaps I missed it.
Really? Huh. Is there any videos of her being this miserable person you disagree with? I'd like some background. I don't tend to follow actors so closely, so perhaps I missed it.
Like a million folks quoted my post, some with memes, some with insults and some with random drive by comments that didnt address the points i made, people are already getting inspired by Trump. So they will be ignored altogether lol.Hoping for the best with this movie, but after BvS and SS my expectations are very low.
This is an interesting way to look at things.
BvS is a grueling unwatchable mess, and 100% deserved the score it got. The Marvel movies may not be cinematic masterpieces, but at least they don't sap the life out of you in the most non-entertaining manner possible.
This isn't a DC vs Marvel narrative, at least not for most. I have never read a comic book in my life, and honestly grew up more familiar with he DC universe than Marvel. That said, DC's recent film outings have been utter shit. I hope they pull themselves together, because there's a lot of fun material to work with.
But any MCU Cap movie is better than BvS...Loool where did I mention DCEU movies. If you wanna keep talking that persecution complex that you keep harping on about then it's time to realize you're right in the middle of it
Of course superman and wonder woman are pretty devoid of personality as well. Although I disagree that any Cap movie is better than BvS. And man of Steel > cap 1
Mark Hughes just dropped this about the recent rumors
https://www.facebook.com/MarkHughesFilms/posts/10211357449122778
Mark Hughes just dropped this about the recent rumors
https://www.facebook.com/MarkHughesFilms/posts/10211357449122778
Many people have called Doctor Strange Marvel's Inception since the trailer came out and when the movie came out. Do better.Like a million folks quoted my post, some with memes, some with insults and some with random drive by comments that didnt address the points i made, people are already getting inspired by Trump. So they will be ignored altogether lol.
Choosing this post to reply since it was one of the few to actually take time to write a coherent response.
The problem i have with gaf and i guess critics nowadays is that if it's slightly flawed it's considered a mess, called utter shit etc. If anyone took the time to read my post history they will see that i always concede that BvS is a heavily flawed movie. Pacing is off, character motivations arent setup well, and the title fight sucked. But these are problems pretty much every action movie has to contend with as they try to jam in action setpieces in a 2 hour movie. Marvel movies sprinkle in jokes every five minutes to keep you entertained but that doesnt mean they dont have the same problems with character motivations, pacing and failed potential. I dont see Doctor Strange getting poor reviews because it followed the marvel Origin formula to the tee and was basically Iron Man with inception like action scenes. I have never seen anyone call it a poor man's inception which is bizarre to me because that's precisely what it is.
I dont know how any movie with so many great scenes can be an unwatchable mess just because it kinda drags in the middle and is dreary and takes itself super seriously. there are plenty of great scenes in the movie that keep it moving.
- Opening titles (beautifully shot)
- Great revisiting of Metropolis' destruction. Effortlessly sets up Batman's motivations
- Great montage of Superman saving shit. And people still bitching about it. Sets up Superman's state of mind.
- Great sequence with Bruce and Clark interacting for the first time on screen.
- Cool Batmobile action scene.
- Awesome one shot knightmare action scene
- Great little surprise with Lex blowing up the congressional hearing. no one saw it coming.
- Great last act with Batman warehouse fight (best batman action in a movie yet), doomsday fight with superman, final doomsday fight with all three superheroes.
I get it. people have short attention spans and can get bored quickly. but i have no idea how a movie can have some many great scenes and be utter shit like you said and the RT score suggests.
THIS THREAD IS ABOUT ME NOW
Is it me or is DC really cheapening on the talents? It seems that the creative teams running these movies are just terrible at capturing what these characters are supposed to be like.
Like a million folks quoted my post, some with memes, some with insults and some with random drive by comments that didnt address the points i made, people are already getting inspired by Trump. So they will be ignored altogether lol.
Choosing this post to reply since it was one of the few to actually take time to write a coherent response.
The problem i have with gaf and i guess critics nowadays is that if it's slightly flawed it's considered a mess, called utter shit etc. If anyone took the time to read my post history they will see that i always concede that BvS is a heavily flawed movie. Pacing is off, character motivations arent setup well, and the title fight sucked. But these are problems pretty much every action movie has to contend with as they try to jam in action setpieces in a 2 hour movie. Marvel movies sprinkle in jokes every five minutes to keep you entertained but that doesnt mean they dont have the same problems with character motivations, pacing and failed potential. I dont see Doctor Strange getting poor reviews because it followed the marvel Origin formula to the tee and was basically Iron Man with inception like action scenes. I have never seen anyone call it a poor man's inception which is bizarre to me because that's precisely what it is.
I dont know how any movie with so many great scenes can be an unwatchable mess just because it kinda drags in the middle and is dreary and takes itself super seriously. there are plenty of great scenes in the movie that keep it moving.
- Opening titles (beautifully shot)
- Great revisiting of Metropolis' destruction. Effortlessly sets up Batman's motivations
- Great montage of Superman saving shit. And people still bitching about it. Sets up Superman's state of mind.
- Great sequence with Bruce and Clark interacting for the first time on screen.
- Cool Batmobile action scene.
- Awesome one shot knightmare action scene
- Great little surprise with Lex blowing up the congressional hearing. no one saw it coming.
- Great last act with Batman warehouse fight (best batman action in a movie yet), doomsday fight with superman, final doomsday fight with all three superheroes.
I get it. people have short attention spans and can get bored quickly. but i have no idea how a movie can have some many great scenes and be utter shit like you said and the RT score suggests.
I get it. people have short attention spans and can get bored quickly. but i have no idea how a movie can have some many great scenes and be utter shit like you said and the RT score suggests.
Like, it's okay to like something that is not that good. I for instance love Bloodsport, I ain't gonna try to convince people that Bloodsport is the pinnacle of cinema that audiences don't like because they are brainwashed by Stevan Segal movies.1. Great movies are more than just a collection of great scenes.
2. The RT score that actually matters, the average rating, is 4.9/10. That doesn't suggest a movie that is utter shit; that suggests a movie that is just a tiny bit below average. The 27 percent number you're looking at means 27 percent of critics liked it and 73 percent didn't; the numeric value of their like or dislike is not equal (e.g. someone who thought it was a 10/10 and someone who thought it was a 6/10 could both be considered liking the movie).
3. Maybe a lot of those scenes actually aren't all that great, but you just happen to like them?
I wonder if people realize that Warner Bros doesn't care why you bought a ticket so long as you bought a ticket.
Supporting their trash just means more garbage because in their eyes it is working as intended. BvS and SS may have been received as the hot garbage they were but they both made a shitload of money.
Like, it's okay to like something that is not that good. I for instance love Bloodsport, I ain't gonna try to convince people that Bloodsport is the pinnacle of cinema that audiences don't like because they are brainwashed by Stevan Segal movies.
Is it me or is DC really cheapening on the talents? It seems that the creative teams running these movies are just terrible at capturing what these characters are supposed to be like.
I wonder if people realize that Warner Bros doesn't care why you bought a ticket so long as you bought a ticket.
Supporting their trash just means more garbage because in their eyes it is working as intended. BvS and SS may have been received as the hot garbage they were but they both made a shitload of money.
You still haven't explained WHY the statistical average of every professional movie reviewer in the English speaking world is somehow biased in favor of Marvel.
Many people have called Doctor Strange Marvel's Inception since the trailer came out and when the movie came out. Do better.
Yes, these are the best moments in these movies.Well I'm still down for the comic book like action, which is the best thing the DC films have been offering. (Smallville fight and the Warehouse are still grade A fight scenes in my book)
I did. People like their forgettable popcorn summer blockbusters to be funny, simple, and short. Marvel knows this and makes everything go through their Foxconn factory with yes man directors making the same film over and over again. You guys got your wish with SS being this funny, forgettable and simple action flick and Wonder Woman looking like a Captain America First Avenger ripoff but apparently DC films dont have that luxury of being simple and fun. Maybe we can get some of the critics to answer why 40%+ of them thought SS was rotten and Thor 2 and IM2 were fresh?
I dont know how any movie with so many great scenes can be an unwatchable mess just because it kinda drags in the middle and is dreary and takes itself super seriously. there are plenty of great scenes in the movie that keep it moving.
- Opening titles (beautifully shot)
- Great revisiting of Metropolis' destruction. Effortlessly sets up Batman's motivations
- Great montage of Superman saving shit. And people still bitching about it. Sets up Superman's state of mind.
- Great sequence with Bruce and Clark interacting for the first time on screen.
- Cool Batmobile action scene.
- Awesome one shot knightmare action scene
- Great little surprise with Lex blowing up the congressional hearing. no one saw it coming.
- Great last act with Batman warehouse fight (best batman action in a movie yet), doomsday fight with superman, final doomsday fight with all three superheroes.
I get it. people have short attention spans and can get bored quickly. but i have no idea how a movie can have some many great scenes and be utter shit like you said and the RT score suggests.
They know fans will pay to watch the movie, then pay again to see the "extended/director's cut" on rerelease. At this point, I'm not convinced they aren't doing this on purpose.
Lots of stuff.
I did. People like their forgettable popcorn summer blockbusters to be funny, simple, and short. Marvel knows this and makes everything go through their Foxconn factory with yes man directors making the same film over and over again. You guys got your wish with SS being this funny, forgettable and simple action flick and Wonder Woman looking like a Captain America First Avenger ripoff but apparently DC films dont have that luxury of being simple and fun. Maybe we can get some of the critics to answer why 40%+ of them thought SS was rotten and Thor 2 and IM2 were fresh?
But Bloodsport was pretty bad
oh what a load of crap. someone takes the time out to articulate why the have a certain opinion and you dismissing it like that is a shitty move. if you disagree with me saying that marvel movies havent become formulaic, then say so. if you disagree with me saying that BvS isn't an utter failure or an unwatchable mess than point out why. For example, do what the guys below did.Slimysnake is doing a long form 'like what I like, don't like what I don't like or Ur stoopid'
Two things at play here:
1. Expectations: People expect way more out of superhero movies now than they did when Iron Man 2 came out. People (especially movie critics) have become pretty jaded by comic book movies at this point. It takes a lot more to entertain people now than it did in 2010 or even 2013. By the same token, Batman 1989 got a 72% on rotten tomatoes and I promise you it would not even come near that if it came out in 2017.
2. You are acting like Rotten Tomatoes isn't a constantly changing body of critics. Not only have expectations changed, but the people actually reviewing the movie have changed. Looking at the top 5 top critics positive reviews on Thor, only one of them actually reviewed Suicide Squad. So it's not really fair to act like these are the same people who liked Thor 2. And it obviously gets worse the further you go back.
Bonus: This guy described Thor 2 as "The Crocodile Dundee II of superhero films—in a good way!" which is a hilarious description of Thor 2.
There is a very special distinction in saying that BvS and SS are medicore movies with flaws vs they are outright bad movies which is what the scores suggest. I have written rants on the flaws of BvS (SS i dont care much about because it's just a fun movie to waste two hours on) so I am in agreement with nearly all of your concerns. What bothers me is when people just trash these movies like they are the worst movies they have ever seen. There was a thread earlier this month about X-Men apocalypse where someone thought that was the worst movie they had seen that year. People just need to watch more movies because if you look at the movies that end up in the 20s in rotten tomatoes you will see shit like Fifty shades of grey with the twilight movies and Daredevil in the 40s and 50s.So I just wanted to pop into the conversation real quick and say that while everyone is entitled to like whatever movies they like - when you argue for why BvS isn't as bad as people claim it is and then make over reaching comments like "No one saw it coming" and "Effortlessly sets up ..." or "awesome one shot nightmare.." kind of stuff you expose a little bit of your own blinders to the conversation.
I get confused when people choose stuff like SS or BvS as their hills to die on. They just seem like such mediocre attempts compared to firing on all cylinder marvel movies. I don't believe any movie could possibly be as bad as Suicide Squad was but I absolutely worry that WW will look and sound and feel and flow very much like BvS did... and that's not a good thing.
oh what a load of crap. someone takes the time out to articulate why the have a certain opinion and you dismissing it like that is a shitty move. if you disagree with me saying that marvel movies havent become formulaic, then say so. if you disagree with me saying that BvS isn't an utter failure or an unwatchable mess than point out why. For example, do what the guys below did.
If RT's standards were improving than why is Doctor Strange at 89%? Does it not have the same problems as all other marvel movies? Bad villains? throwaway female leads? Like why was Rachel MacAdams even in the movie? But i guess being formulaic isnt deserving of a negative review?
There is a very special distinction in saying that BvS and SS are medicore movies with flaws vs they are outright bad movies which is what the scores suggest. I have written rants on the flaws of BvS (SS i dont care much about because it's just a fun movie to waste two hours on) so I am in agreement with nearly all of your concerns. What bothers me is when people just trash these movies like they are the worst movies they have ever seen. There was a thread earlier this month about X-Men apocalypse where someone thought that was the worst movie they had seen that year. People just need to watch more movies because if you look at the movies that end up in the 20s in rotten tomatoes you will see shit like Fifty shades of grey with the twilight movies and Daredevil in the 40s and 50s.
I have always conceded that BvS is fucking flawed. But it doesnt belong anywhere near those awful movies.