I'm still trying to fully grasp existentialism. It's harder when not making the effort to live out the philosophy in daily life, although I do find the arguments compelling.You pass on your genes to extend into immortality.....so no you would just be around to witness it. With immortality would just come new ways to experience life or how time/space/life works. Existence only carries the meaning you put into it.
Yeah, that one. Would you find life meaningless in that situation?Immortality like you couldn’t ever get hurt no matter what happens to you or
Maybe eventually, it’d open a galaxy of possibilities (literally) and before you get off the planet there’d be all sorts of fun things to try like being shot out of a cannon or driving out of an aeroplane or even just exploring oceans and getting stronger than Goku.Yeah, that one. Would you find life meaningless in that situation?
Like intelligent forms of life capable of perceiving higher dimensions or experiencing spacetime in a non-linear fashion?Your thinking is too limited and defined by what you know of life as it is now. All the poetry and fiction and philosophy of the world is of a single perspective, that of a mortal one, and thus can not be used to understand an immortal one. What we mortals define as being “alive” might have a complete different meaning to someone immoral, what matters and what does not would be completely different to them.
I believe the former. I feel like the latter is a lesser form of immorality and the former is immaterial and some form of "god hood." Being able to perish still caries some consequence and making choices more meaningful? Your existence would not violate the laws of physics.Immortality like you couldn’t ever get hurt no matter what happens to you or immortality where you can live forever age-wise but can still be killed?
Q briefly becoming mortal is probably up there as one of my favorite Star Trek episodes. A little goofy, but profound at least imhoI mean, doesn't he look depressed?
The oldest fossil remains of Homo sapiens, dating back to 300,000 years, have been found at a site in Jebel Irhoud, Morocco. This is 100,000 years older than previously discovered fossils of Homo sapiens that have been securely dated. The discovery was presented in a study in the journal Nature on Wednesday.
No. The current impermanence of life does not implicitly grant it meaning.Extending average life spans, that I can see the understand. Although wouldn't the concept of immortality make life meaningless, or at least seem ultimately meaningless?
Or am I flawed in my thinking for assuming that essence proceeds existence.
You’d have time to find a way to fix any issues you may have, your brain shouldn’t deteriorate given your immortality.Also how will your brain handle all the information you accumulate over the years? Unless you forget everything every 100 years or so...
Unless you learn everything you can and when the time comes either fix it’s demise or relocate.If the average human lives to lets say 75 years, I'd say 200 would be a good enough age limit.
Immortality wouldn't make sense as you'd be bored to death and go crazy. A billion years from now when the earth explodes, you'd be floating in space forever.
A fate worse than death. Even if living on another planet will be achieved before that happens, you'd have to be careful during your time on Earth not to get trapped where no one can find you.A billion years from now when the earth explodes, you'd be floating in space forever.
That would be a very long while though. Think of all of the entertainment you could consume, skills you could master, places you could go, and technology changes over time so you could experience so many new things. Yes, I agree that it could get boring but life is what you make of it.I think it'd get pretty boring after a while, personally.
This discussion reminds me of that episode/s of "The Good Place" with Lisa Kudrow in them. Immortal people would eventually get bored doing the same thing over and over again. There has to be something after immortality, or at least an out.
Life is already meaningless. Immortality doesn't change that.
Also, seems kind of convenient as a mortal to think immortality would make life meaningless, like confirmation bias or existential rationalization. You have a small mind.
Also how will your brain handle all the information you accumulate over the years? Unless you forget everything every 100 years or so...
Extending average life spans, that I can see the understand. Although wouldn't the concept of immortality make life meaningless, or at least seem ultimately meaningless?
Or am I flawed in my thinking for assuming that essence proceeds existence.