How did I skim over this?
She isn't a feminist. That's a downright misogynistic thing to say.
Nope, it isn't. It is definitely put into a crazy context in this article though.
The statement was done speaking entirely on the idea of women of the time in their socialization, not women entirely. It's a statement on the demonizing of 'patriarchy' and the existence of the persisting gender dichotomy of male and female throughout female nature and the benefits that have come from its work.