Strict parameters were provided at the start of the thread to manage the scope of the discussion. Hilariously and expectedly, we’ve arrived at an outcome that is far out of scope.
After seeing how badly people struggled in this thread with reading comprehension, objective discussion, acknowledging and managing bias for productive conversation, there are lots of learnings to be had.
Things we can take away from this thread:
1) Some gaffers struggle badly with reading comprehension. I’d argue that this is one of the main sources of disagreement.
2) People struggle a lot with scope and staying within the parameters of discussion. We can see this in the numerous references to feel, build quality, ergonomics in an art aesthetics thread.
3) Productive and constructive discussion is difficult to achieve due to the inability of the average gaffer to manage and acknowledge their biases. The failure to do so allows it to inadvertently creep into the conversation often leading to contention/unnecessary disagreements.
4) More importantly, serious improvement is needed from many users.
To those who stayed within the scope of discussion
click here, thank you. To the rest, you seriously need to improve. Like badly.